wemby

wemby — CS2 Stats

76561198282315614[U:1:322049886]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

980Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,690 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,690 → 1,690
+3Tracked matches · now 980
+3.3ppWin rate · 36.7% → 40.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 43 days played since 15 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,942 -3,298 16 Feb28 Jun · 14 days played
17,55621,240peak 21,24016 Feb28 Jun
21,619Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,690Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
43Days played since 2026-02-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,690
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 61 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-19
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-19

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGwembyFACEITLevel 7 · 1,690 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,690csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning41
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY4456Last 10044%Win rateWLWWLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −5.5pp headshot accuracy · −150ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 551ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 634ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.2 against its own average).

Aim5.2
Utility6.7
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.4
Clutch2.8

Effective flashesLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 73% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.82 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 665ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning4.1
Utility6.7
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels0.6
Win Impact1.7

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time658ms+10ms
first ⅓ avg 648ms → last ⅓ avg 658ms
Headshot accuracy16.0%−3.9%
first ⅓ avg 19.9% → last ⅓ avg 16.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.06Best match rating · 5–13 · inferno, 22 Mar
34%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · inferno, 23 Feb
469msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · inferno, 14 Aug
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 2 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
610In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 62% over 26anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA26161062%-0.01
dust2D2571828%-0.04
ancientD1851328%-0.03
nukeA169756%-0.02
anubisD51420%-0.01
cache42250%-0.03
mirage32167%0.01
overpass21150%0.01
vertigo110100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

867Matches
51%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
68.4ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno6955%1.0013.4
Dust26841%0.7812.1
Nuke5349%0.8712.6
Ancient4139%0.8313.9
Cache1662%0.8013.3
Anubis1155%0.9313.2
Overpass667%1.1816.3
Mirage683%0.9614.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.1%Headshot accuracy
34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.8%Spray accuracy
78.4%Counter-strafing
11.5°Preaim
665msReaction time
28.0%T opening success
34.8%CT opening success
0.82Enemies flashed / flash
7.5%Flash assists
13.72HE damage / grenade
4.46Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.0231% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient16–140.0115%23 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0212%14 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0117%14 Sept
ancient6–10.054%14 Sept
inferno2–13-0.078%29 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0319%29 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0612%16 Aug
ancient8–13-0.077%16 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0319%14 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0123%14 Aug
dust210–13-0.038%10 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0127%31 Jul
nuke8–130.0113%24 Jul
inferno13–90.0513%8 Jul
anubis11–130.0417%8 Jul
cache3–13-0.0330%8 Jul
vertigo13–50.0425%8 Jul
mirage7–50.0123%8 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0710%28 Jun
nuke13–80.0426%28 Jun
mirage13–70.0520%28 Jun
inferno13–10-0.057%25 Jun
ancient13–11-0.065%25 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0823%5 Jun
dust211–13-0.0311%4 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0317%1 Jun
dust22–13-0.0517%31 May
ancient10–13-0.0217%31 May
ancient8–13-0.0819%24 May
cache13–7-0.0121%24 May
ancient8–13-0.0217%24 May
nuke7–13-0.0519%24 May
dust28–13-0.056%18 May
cache13–8-0.0517%18 May
cache13–16-0.0419%15 May
nuke13–40.0123%14 May
mirage10–13-0.0315%10 May
nuke13–5-0.0226%7 May
ancient11–130.0117%3 May
ancient3–13-0.0321%30 Apr
nuke13–70.0420%30 Apr
dust28–13-0.0824%30 Apr
inferno13–4-0.0523%30 Apr
dust214–16-0.0431%27 Apr
inferno13–60.009%27 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0114%27 Apr
ancient9–130.0012%24 Apr
dust219–17-0.0123%24 Apr
dust213–80.0414%24 Apr
inferno13–50.056%22 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0133%19 Apr
overpass13–70.045%19 Apr
dust28–13-0.0121%19 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0116%19 Apr
ancient13–16-0.0425%13 Apr
nuke16–12-0.0222%13 Apr
inferno13–40.0114%7 Apr
dust213–9-0.0221%7 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0122%2 Apr
inferno13–20.0115%2 Apr
dust29–13-0.0919%2 Apr
ancient5–13-0.075%2 Apr
inferno13–7-0.046%31 Mar
ancient9–13-0.0522%29 Mar
dust216–13-0.0111%29 Mar
dust213–3-0.0221%26 Mar
inferno5–130.0622%22 Mar
nuke13–11-0.0910%22 Mar
inferno13–6-0.0115%22 Mar
dust28–13-0.0623%22 Mar
nuke13–50.0118%20 Mar
inferno13–30.0323%20 Mar
nuke11–130.0117%20 Mar
anubis8–13-0.0319%20 Mar
inferno13–100.0419%20 Mar
dust25–13-0.0711%18 Mar
dust27–13-0.0628%15 Mar
inferno13–10-0.0424%15 Mar
dust211–13-0.1021%15 Mar
nuke13–8-0.0715%6 Mar
dust213–80.0025%6 Mar
ancient4–13-0.0613%6 Mar
dust29–13-0.0622%6 Mar
overpass11–13-0.0217%6 Mar
dust213–11-0.0528%4 Mar
ancient13–7-0.0421%4 Mar
dust22–13-0.0429%4 Mar
ancient5–13-0.079%4 Mar
dust29–13-0.0528%4 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0415%23 Feb
inferno13–50.0334%23 Feb
dust27–13-0.0331%23 Feb
dust27–13-0.0320%17 Feb
dust29–13-0.0615%17 Feb
inferno6–13-0.1018%17 Feb
inferno11–13-0.0120%16 Feb
inferno11–13-0.0320%16 Feb
ancient13–10-0.0424%16 Feb
anubis16–13-0.0113%15 Feb
inferno13–7-0.0114%15 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →