BR9HTRD

BR9HTRD — CS2 Stats

76561198280961858[U:1:320696130]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,856Tracked matches31%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating20,942Top 50% of 204,412 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#68009 of 251742 tracked
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 27 Sep 2026 (17 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,942 -3,581 29 Jun – 27 Sept · 10 days played
20,50324,523peak 24,52329 Jun27 Sept
24,523Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,741Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
57Days played since 2026-05-24

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,741
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 10 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,581 below peak (24,523)
  • +439 over 30 days · improving
  • -3,581 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,058 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBR9HTRDPREMIER20,942 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,741csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning46
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD38–52–10Last 10038%Win rateWLLWLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.5pp headshot accuracy · +2ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Last 10

  • 2–8 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 577ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim7.9
Utility5.7
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 567ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning4.6
Utility5.7
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time568ms−11ms
first ⅓ avg 579ms → last ⅓ avg 568ms
Headshot accuracy23.4%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 24.4% → last ⅓ avg 23.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 9–3 · sanctum, 9 Jun →
78%Best headshot accuracy · 9–2 · nuke, 10 Jun →
391msFastest reaction time · 4–9 · inferno, 7 Jul →
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 8 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
9–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 58% over 12mirageWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2210–1245%-0.01
nukeC125–742%0.00
anubisA127–558%0.02
mirageC114–736%0.00
dust2C114–736%0.02
cacheC83–538%-0.02
ancient—42–250%0.02
train—31–233%-0.05
poseidon—30–30%-0.04
eldorado—30–30%-0.08
shelter—31–233%0.02
fachwerk—20–20%-0.02
boulder—20–20%-0.02
debris—20–20%0.01
vertigo—10–10%-0.21
sanctum—11–0100%0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

550Matches
54%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
78.0ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10563%1.1515.7
Anubis6563%1.3715.2
Ancient6047%1.1015.5
Vertigo4951%1.1215.0
Inferno3949%1.0014.2
Nuke2733%0.8314.1
Dust21650%1.1415.6
Overpass1155%0.8513.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.8%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.8%Spray accuracy
82.7%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
567msReaction time
32.9%T opening success
46.9%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
9.15HE damage / grenade
8.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.9139% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
train13–7-0.0722%11 Oct →
train10–13-0.1010%8 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0422%27 Sept →
nuke13–110.0413%27 Sept →
cache7–130.0214%23 Sept →
dust25–130.1134%23 Sept →
fachwerk3–130.0235%23 Sept →
dust24–130.0426%23 Sept →
poseidon4–9-0.0422%20 Sept →
inferno9–130.0321%15 Sept →
eldorado5–9-0.0826%15 Sept →
dust29–130.0120%14 Sept →
anubis13–90.0322%12 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0326%11 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0218%10 Sept →
inferno9–50.0513%8 Sept →
anubis13–70.0829%8 Sept →
ancient13–20.0115%8 Sept →
anubis13–30.0420%8 Sept →
dust216–140.0726%2 Sept →
train10–130.0322%1 Sept →
shelter5–130.0353%1 Sept →
fachwerk3–13-0.0518%1 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0521%31 Aug →
anubis15–150.0420%31 Aug →
shelter13–80.0823%29 Aug →
boulder8–130.0630%29 Aug →
mirage7–130.0719%28 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0421%28 Aug →
boulder7–13-0.1033%27 Aug →
shelter7–13-0.0530%27 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0419%27 Aug →
dust25–130.0131%27 Aug →
nuke1–9-0.250%27 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0417%20 Aug →
mirage13–100.0617%19 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0635%19 Aug →
inferno8–8-0.0218%19 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0715%15 Aug →
cache12–12-0.0025%15 Aug →
poseidon7–9-0.0530%6 Aug →
mirage15–15-0.0515%4 Aug →
inferno7–9-0.1118%4 Aug →
inferno9–20.0740%2 Aug →
inferno9–20.1314%2 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0420%31 Jul →
anubis10–13-0.0212%29 Jul →
dust216–13-0.0219%28 Jul →
inferno11–130.0031%27 Jul →
cache13–7-0.0724%27 Jul →
mirage13–50.1318%27 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0129%26 Jul →
inferno13–40.0814%26 Jul →
anubis16–140.0722%25 Jul →
cache13–80.0632%23 Jul →
cache12–12-0.0322%23 Jul →
inferno8–80.0431%23 Jul →
inferno0–9-0.180%23 Jul →
inferno7–90.0645%22 Jul →
vertigo3–9-0.2143%22 Jul →
nuke7–90.0536%17 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0216%17 Jul →
eldorado4–90.0440%17 Jul →
eldorado1–9-0.1929%16 Jul →
debris6–9-0.1029%16 Jul →
debris8–80.1124%16 Jul →
dust27–130.0113%14 Jul →
dust24–13-0.0226%13 Jul →
nuke13–60.1031%12 Jul →
poseidon8–8-0.0333%8 Jul →
inferno4–9-0.140%7 Jul →
mirage12–12-0.0225%7 Jul →
inferno13–50.0321%7 Jul →
inferno5–9-0.170%29 Jun →
inferno13–110.0617%29 Jun →
nuke11–130.0525%29 Jun →
ancient11–130.0125%28 Jun →
cache13–10-0.0321%26 Jun →
inferno8–80.0326%24 Jun →
anubis13–110.0613%23 Jun →
anubis3–13-0.0635%22 Jun →
anubis13–50.0423%21 Jun →
inferno9–50.0222%21 Jun →
dust213–30.0122%18 Jun →
mirage10–13-0.1021%18 Jun →
dust29–130.0522%17 Jun →
nuke10–13-0.0028%13 Jun →
anubis13–50.0520%12 Jun →
inferno9–7-0.0843%10 Jun →
nuke9–2-0.0178%10 Jun →
sanctum9–30.1327%9 Jun →
nuke9–50.0256%9 Jun →
ancient16–14-0.0217%9 Jun →
nuke6–90.0413%8 Jun →
ancient9–130.0820%8 Jun →
dust213–9-0.0114%7 Jun →
nuke13–40.0715%3 Jun →
mirage13–110.0224%2 Jun →
anubis11–13-0.0218%1 Jun →
inferno9–60.0125%24 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.