Gaijin — CS2 Stats

TF76561198280640341[U:1:320374613]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

422Tracked matches50%Win rate2025Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating12,620Blue band · top ~41% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#14038 of 20147 tracked

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74

Positioning49

Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–45–3Last 10052%Win rateWWWLLWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.4

Aggression6.2

Utility3.4

Positioning4.9

Opening Duels2.5

Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.77 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 564ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4

Positioning4.9

Utility3.4

Mechanics5.7

Opening Duels2.7

Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time559ms−63ms

first ⅓ avg 621ms → last ⅓ avg 559ms

Headshot accuracy18.1%+1.2%

first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — ancient 13–4

13–2Biggest win — anubis

8Longest win streak

W3Current streak

6–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 75% over 16cacheWeakest map · 20% over 5

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	26	10–16	38%	0.00
mirage	A	20	12–8	60%	0.00
ancient	S	16	12–4	75%	0.02
inferno	B	15	7–8	47%	-0.01
nuke	A	12	7–5	58%	0.01
anubis	B	6	3–3	50%	0.00
cache	D	5	1–4	20%	-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

54Matches

43%Win rate

0.84Avg K/D

72.6ADR

37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

5%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	19	47%	0.93	15.1
Dust2	11	73%	0.91	14.1
Ancient	6	33%	0.76	16.0
Inferno	6	33%	0.92	13.2
Cache	5	0%	0.57	9.4
Anubis	3	33%	0.79	18.3
Overpass	2	0%	0.46	7.5
Nuke	2	50%	0.72	8.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy

33.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.1%Spray accuracy

75.8%Counter-strafing

7.3°Preaim

564msReaction time

28.3%T opening success

52.0%CT opening success

0.77Enemies flashed / flash

9.7%Flash assists

4.70HE damage / grenade

3.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 3.6218 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.2751% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–5	-0.01	14%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.14	22%	28 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.03	15%	28 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.02	23%	28 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.05	12%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.07	11%	28 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	19%	27 Aug →
dust2	0–13	-0.07	35%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.00	41%	27 Aug →
ancient	2–13	0.03	10%	26 Aug →
cache	14–16	-0.03	43%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.05	15%	25 Aug →
inferno	1–13	-0.04	11%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.00	24%	25 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.05	14%	25 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.01	21%	25 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.01	17%	25 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	9%	24 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.04	15%	24 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.06	3%	24 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.06	31%	23 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.09	28%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.03	14%	21 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.01	14%	21 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.03	23%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.04	13%	21 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.08	19%	20 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.02	11%	20 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.03	21%	20 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.02	10%	19 Aug →
ancient	16–12	0.03	8%	19 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.16	11%	19 Aug →
dust2	16–14	0.03	18%	19 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.08	15%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	13%	19 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.04	13%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–4	-0.04	7%	18 Aug →
nuke	16–13	-0.01	22%	18 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.03	26%	18 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.03	8%	18 Aug →
nuke	10–13	-0.04	30%	17 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.11	22%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	9%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.05	4%	17 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.01	13%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.05	10%	17 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.00	21%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.03	11%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–5	0.03	13%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.05	20%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.00	29%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.09	13%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–16	0.03	9%	15 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.01	23%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.00	22%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.02	11%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.00	13%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.03	30%	14 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.14	15%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.04	9%	14 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.04	13%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.06	14%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–16	0.02	17%	13 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.00	17%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.08	22%	12 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.05	15%	11 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.06	19%	10 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.07	15%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.03	22%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.01	11%	9 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.02	11%	8 Aug →
dust2	9–2	-0.01	29%	8 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.07	25%	7 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	13%	6 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.03	0%	6 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	4%	5 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.04	23%	5 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	15%	5 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.02	21%	5 Aug →
anubis	13–2	0.02	18%	5 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.01	9%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.02	0%	4 Aug →
dust2	15–15	-0.03	13%	4 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.06	18%	4 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.00	15%	3 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.03	10%	3 Aug →
nuke	13–7	-0.04	17%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.05	17%	3 Aug →
inferno	6–13	0.02	11%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.06	21%	3 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.02	22%	2 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.09	20%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.02	11%	2 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.01	18%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–9	-0.03	24%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.05	26%	1 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	26%	1 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.03	9%	31 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.08	17%	31 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.02	47%	31 Jul →