M1k0

M1k0 — CS2 Stats

76561198279935927[U:1:319670199]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,210Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,746Top 25% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#40784 of 221250 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,108 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 47 days played since 1 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,746 -5,136 1 Jul16 Sept · 39 days played
19,97627,882peak 27,8821 Jul16 Sept
28,043Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,108Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
47Days played since 2026-07-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,108
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 392 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7

Premier CS Rating

  • 5,136 below peak (27,882)
  • +463 over 30 days · improving
  • -5,136 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 2,254 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGM1k0FACEITLevel 9 · 2,108 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER22,746 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,108csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning62
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49474Last 10049%Win rateWTLWWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +0.8pp headshot accuracy · +63ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 311 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 517ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 524ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim9.0
Utility5.3
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning6.2
Utility5.3
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact3.3

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time536ms−59ms
first ⅓ avg 594ms → last ⅓ avg 536ms
Headshot accuracy24.9%+6.9%
first ⅓ avg 18.1% → last ⅓ avg 24.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–0 · dust2, 3 Aug
50%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · dust2, 9 Aug
367msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · ancient, 24 Aug
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 3 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
68In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 55% over 11anubisWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B39201951%0.01
mirageB38172145%0.01
ancientA116555%0.03
anubisC52340%-0.00
inferno220100%0.08
nuke21150%0.02
cache21150%0.00
train1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,032Matches
50%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
80.3ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage29747%1.1816.5
Dust219843%1.0915.7
Anubis17259%1.1416.4
Ancient14246%1.1415.8
Inferno9257%1.1415.8
Nuke3751%1.1715.7
Vertigo1669%1.5820.4
Train1573%1.2417.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.9%Headshot accuracy
38.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.6%Spray accuracy
78.1%Counter-strafing
6.7°Preaim
531msReaction time
35.7%T opening success
53.2%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
7.4%Flash assists
10.43HE damage / grenade
7.87Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.7023% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–8-0.0216%16 Sept
dust215–15-0.0121%16 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0021%9 Sept
ancient13–70.0122%8 Sept
dust213–80.0733%6 Sept
dust25–13-0.0633%4 Sept
inferno13–100.1024%3 Sept
train8–13-0.0238%3 Sept
dust29–13-0.0419%2 Sept
dust23–13-0.0726%1 Sept
dust213–50.0121%30 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0319%30 Aug
dust22–130.0635%29 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0223%27 Aug
ancient6–130.0245%25 Aug
ancient8–130.0218%24 Aug
dust213–100.0511%24 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0627%21 Aug
mirage13–100.0620%21 Aug
ancient11–130.0325%20 Aug
mirage13–160.0319%16 Aug
dust20–13-0.0640%14 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0219%14 Aug
ancient13–30.0523%13 Aug
dust213–40.0725%12 Aug
ancient13–60.0524%12 Aug
mirage13–20.0318%12 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0819%10 Aug
dust28–130.0150%9 Aug
dust213–100.0325%9 Aug
dust213–10.0328%9 Aug
dust28–13-0.0213%8 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0422%8 Aug
cache7–130.0230%7 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0524%6 Aug
mirage10–130.0026%5 Aug
anubis8–130.0026%5 Aug
dust212–12-0.0021%4 Aug
dust213–60.0920%4 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0215%4 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0314%4 Aug
dust25–13-0.0336%3 Aug
dust213–00.1221%3 Aug
mirage13–70.0622%2 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0511%2 Aug
dust213–40.0741%31 Jul
dust213–7-0.059%31 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0323%30 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0213%30 Jul
dust215–150.0522%30 Jul
dust213–80.0521%29 Jul
mirage7–130.0428%29 Jul
ancient13–80.0320%28 Jul
dust29–13-0.0320%28 Jul
dust20–130.0640%28 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0047%28 Jul
dust213–70.0429%27 Jul
ancient13–110.0624%27 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0233%27 Jul
dust213–10-0.0547%27 Jul
mirage9–130.0323%27 Jul
dust216–14-0.0132%25 Jul
dust213–90.0638%24 Jul
dust213–40.0136%24 Jul
dust21–13-0.040%24 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0617%24 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0318%24 Jul
mirage5–130.0238%24 Jul
dust213–80.0017%23 Jul
mirage14–160.0320%23 Jul
mirage13–110.0123%23 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0111%22 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0236%20 Jul
mirage13–100.0021%20 Jul
mirage13–50.1017%20 Jul
mirage13–20.0517%18 Jul
inferno13–110.0729%18 Jul
nuke13–60.0712%17 Jul
mirage11–130.0622%17 Jul
cache13–7-0.0216%17 Jul
dust29–130.0020%17 Jul
mirage13–20.0514%16 Jul
dust213–30.0117%16 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0119%16 Jul
anubis13–50.0114%16 Jul
mirage9–130.0217%16 Jul
mirage13–60.0010%13 Jul
dust213–70.0520%13 Jul
dust29–130.0117%12 Jul
mirage13–110.0315%12 Jul
mirage13–30.0818%12 Jul
mirage13–100.0513%12 Jul
dust28–130.0217%12 Jul
mirage9–13-0.009%9 Jul
anubis11–130.0421%3 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0113%3 Jul
dust22–13-0.0716%3 Jul
ancient11–130.079%2 Jul
dust211–130.0221%1 Jul
mirage13–50.0217%1 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →