Hermu

Hermu — CS2 Stats

FI76561198278596428[U:1:318330700]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,486Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating24,999Top 25% of 204,316 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#21705 of 251410 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,080 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,999 +3,319 10 May – 12 Oct · 32 days played
21,66924,999peak 24,99910 May12 Oct
Faceit ELO: 2,080 +0 2 Sept – 4 Oct · 4 observations
2,0802,080peak 2,0802 Sept4 Oct
25,105Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,080Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
57Days played since 2026-04-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,080
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 420 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-02
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-02

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 24,999
  • +106 over 30 days · steady
  • +1,556 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHermuFACEITLevel 9 · 2,080 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER24,999 · Pink band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO2,080csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning45
Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–49–3Last 10048%Win rateWWWLWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +1.6pp headshot accuracy · −26ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.6 against its own average).

Aim9.0
Utility6.5
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch2.6

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 91% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 44 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 588ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning4.5
Utility6.5
Mechanics9.1
Opening Duels3.1
Win Impact2.8

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time590ms−9ms
first ⅓ avg 600ms → last ⅓ avg 590ms
Headshot accuracy17.9%+3.4%
first ⅓ avg 14.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–5 · ancient, 13 May →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · cache, 15 Aug →
375msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · ancient, 12 Aug →
13–2Biggest win · overpass, 14 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W3Current streak
7–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 63% over 8infernoWeakest map · 26% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2313–1057%0.01
infernoD195–1426%0.01
ancientB178–947%-0.02
anubisA116–555%0.02
cacheA85–363%0.01
overpassC83–538%0.00
mirageA74–357%-0.01
dust2A53–260%-0.01
vertigo—10–10%-0.05
train—11–0100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (26% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,798Matches
51%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
75.0ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient10253%1.0314.3
Nuke9854%1.2415.7
Inferno8457%1.2515.3
Anubis8156%1.1415.8
Mirage3037%0.9714.3
Train2962%1.2314.3
Overpass2854%1.0615.5
Cache2250%0.9714.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.6%Headshot accuracy
41.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
48.5%Spray accuracy
90.8%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
588msReaction time
37.2%T opening success
47.6%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
7.5%Flash assists
9.19HE damage / grenade
6.92Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.1925% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

26% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–10-0.0018%12 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0215%12 Oct →
nuke13–80.0415%12 Oct →
anubis6–130.0018%5 Oct →
ancient16–13-0.0213%5 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0421%29 Sept →
nuke13–160.0017%26 Sept →
ancient2–13-0.0412%14 Sept →
nuke11–130.0515%14 Sept →
vertigo10–13-0.0519%8 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0311%7 Sept →
cache9–13-0.028%7 Sept →
cache5–130.0131%6 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0317%5 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0311%22 Aug →
nuke13–110.0119%17 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0414%16 Aug →
mirage10–10.055%16 Aug →
mirage13–70.0414%16 Aug →
inferno2–130.0116%15 Aug →
train13–70.0213%15 Aug →
cache13–4-0.0050%15 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.0718%15 Aug →
anubis13–70.0618%15 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0422%12 Aug →
inferno6–130.0628%10 Aug →
inferno6–130.0626%4 Aug →
inferno13–5-0.0220%4 Aug →
cache13–80.0622%2 Aug →
inferno8–130.0212%30 Jul →
inferno6–130.0415%26 Jul →
nuke13–50.0327%25 Jul →
inferno8–130.0316%17 Jul →
dust213–60.0813%17 Jul →
nuke10–130.0119%17 Jul →
ancient13–100.0320%13 Jul →
nuke13–40.0213%13 Jul →
ancient13–60.037%6 Jul →
inferno13–110.0421%6 Jul →
nuke15–15-0.0226%6 Jul →
anubis13–90.0713%5 Jul →
ancient13–7-0.013%30 Jun →
ancient16–13-0.0216%30 Jun →
inferno8–130.026%27 Jun →
nuke13–5-0.0118%27 Jun →
anubis4–130.0113%22 Jun →
inferno6–13-0.0216%22 Jun →
overpass11–13-0.0312%21 Jun →
nuke11–13-0.0233%21 Jun →
nuke13–10-0.0211%17 Jun →
anubis3–13-0.0611%13 Jun →
overpass13–10-0.006%13 Jun →
inferno13–40.0312%13 Jun →
inferno7–13-0.0217%6 Jun →
mirage13–11-0.0313%5 Jun →
inferno10–130.0315%5 Jun →
ancient11–13-0.0616%3 Jun →
overpass9–130.0013%1 Jun →
nuke7–130.0410%1 Jun →
mirage6–130.0132%30 May →
inferno15–150.0115%30 May →
dust214–16-0.0614%30 May →
nuke13–9-0.0711%30 May →
inferno2–13-0.0711%28 May →
dust27–130.0213%28 May →
nuke5–13-0.0414%27 May →
cache3–13-0.0711%27 May →
inferno11–13-0.0213%26 May →
ancient4–13-0.0717%25 May →
anubis13–110.029%25 May →
nuke13–60.0418%23 May →
overpass13–90.0819%23 May →
anubis13–70.077%23 May →
ancient6–13-0.0913%23 May →
nuke15–15-0.0316%22 May →
ancient9–13-0.0122%20 May →
anubis13–100.0619%20 May →
nuke13–50.0111%20 May →
overpass4–13-0.0127%19 May →
dust213–11-0.0418%19 May →
overpass5–13-0.009%18 May →
ancient4–13-0.0610%15 May →
anubis13–110.016%15 May →
nuke16–120.0415%14 May →
overpass13–20.0218%14 May →
nuke14–16-0.0217%13 May →
ancient13–50.1122%13 May →
inferno13–20.0926%12 May →
nuke13–100.0714%10 May →
inferno13–100.0615%8 May →
inferno10–13-0.0812%6 May →
overpass11–13-0.0215%4 May →
cache13–7-0.017%4 May →
cache13–90.0014%1 May →
mirage3–13-0.106%1 May →
nuke13–50.0211%30 Apr →
ancient13–90.0719%26 Apr →
cache13–50.0715%26 Apr →
mirage13–80.0015%24 Apr →
anubis10–130.0610%20 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.