jbrennan

jbrennan — CS2 Stats

76561198277185579[U:1:316919851]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

551Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#39343 of 229392 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 28 days played since 27 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,986 +3,100 30 May28 Jun · 8 days played
19,88623,254peak 23,25430 May28 Jun
23,254Peak Premier in tracked matches
28Days played since 2026-05-27

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGjbrennanFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning50
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD55423Last 10055%Win rateLLWLWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −50pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +5.1pp headshot accuracy · +34ms reaction

Win rate down 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 639ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 598ms

Last 20

  • 911 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility4.1
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch4.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning5.0
Utility4.1
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time580ms−9ms
first ⅓ avg 588ms → last ⅓ avg 580ms
Headshot accuracy23.6%+1.6%
first ⅓ avg 22.0% → last ⅓ avg 23.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 13–2 · mirage, 22 Jun
45%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · inferno, 10 Jul
438msFastest reaction time · 2–9 · dust2, 28 Jun
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 22 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
65In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 69% over 13ancientWeakest map · 38% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2112957%0.03
dust2B21101148%0.03
infernoA1610663%-0.00
anubisS139469%0.01
cacheA95456%0.01
ancientC83538%0.00
nukeB84450%0.04
overpass42250%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

425Matches
52%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
81.3ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6551%1.0815.8
Anubis3954%1.2116.5
Inferno3751%1.0716.6
Ancient3450%1.1116.9
Dust23256%1.0615.1
Nuke1856%1.3120.1
Cache888%1.4316.9
Overpass540%1.4922.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.6%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.5%Spray accuracy
83.2%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
586msReaction time
35.9%T opening success
35.0%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
3.6%Flash assists
5.19HE damage / grenade
8.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.8907% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage5–13-0.0224%11 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0845%10 Jul
dust213–50.1929%10 Jul
anubis8–130.0223%9 Jul
cache13–70.0418%5 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0329%5 Jul
mirage8–130.0837%5 Jul
ancient4–130.0435%5 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0518%4 Jul
nuke17–19-0.0214%30 Jun
cache11–13-0.0721%29 Jun
anubis13–80.0243%28 Jun
dust22–9-0.0210%28 Jun
cache13–11-0.0223%28 Jun
nuke13–70.0028%27 Jun
mirage13–100.0720%27 Jun
anubis16–120.0218%27 Jun
inferno4–80.0113%27 Jun
anubis13–5-0.0220%27 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0224%27 Jun
anubis13–80.0421%27 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0316%27 Jun
inferno13–50.0914%25 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0022%25 Jun
mirage13–90.0222%24 Jun
inferno13–60.0523%24 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0227%24 Jun
dust28–130.0741%24 Jun
mirage13–70.1216%24 Jun
mirage7–130.0218%24 Jun
dust213–9-0.0131%24 Jun
mirage11–130.0316%23 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0121%23 Jun
cache6–130.0116%23 Jun
dust213–100.0117%23 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0717%23 Jun
dust28–8-0.0321%23 Jun
overpass13–60.0924%22 Jun
dust213–00.1433%22 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0129%22 Jun
dust24–130.0416%22 Jun
mirage13–20.2227%22 Jun
dust213–40.1018%22 Jun
dust24–13-0.1125%22 Jun
cache13–70.1017%21 Jun
dust210–130.0025%21 Jun
nuke7–130.1127%21 Jun
dust26–13-0.0419%21 Jun
mirage10–130.0118%21 Jun
dust212–120.0728%21 Jun
inferno13–50.0427%20 Jun
ancient13–30.1121%20 Jun
overpass0–4-0.110%20 Jun
mirage13–60.0422%20 Jun
overpass13–100.0226%19 Jun
mirage13–20.0627%19 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0815%19 Jun
dust213–70.0433%19 Jun
dust26–13-0.0121%19 Jun
cache3–13-0.0018%18 Jun
mirage13–20.0226%18 Jun
dust213–80.0929%18 Jun
anubis13–80.0532%18 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0425%18 Jun
dust26–13-0.0325%15 Jun
nuke3–60.1316%13 Jun
inferno11–3-0.0219%13 Jun
ancient3–40.0324%13 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0516%9 Jun
cache13–6-0.0019%9 Jun
dust213–80.0516%9 Jun
overpass9–130.0827%8 Jun
anubis12–120.0420%8 Jun
mirage13–5-0.0419%8 Jun
dust27–12-0.0121%8 Jun
inferno13–60.0921%8 Jun
cache13–30.0326%7 Jun
cache10–130.0129%7 Jun
ancient13–60.0221%7 Jun
nuke13–70.0426%7 Jun
dust213–30.0623%6 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0513%6 Jun
mirage9–130.0228%6 Jun
nuke13–5-0.0020%6 Jun
inferno13–20.0124%6 Jun
mirage13–50.0618%6 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0328%1 Jun
anubis13–9-0.0117%1 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0311%1 Jun
anubis3–130.0134%1 Jun
ancient4–13-0.0516%30 May
ancient4–13-0.0621%30 May
nuke16–140.1326%30 May
mirage13–100.0427%30 May
mirage13–50.0438%30 May
anubis13–9-0.028%29 May
inferno12–12-0.0515%28 May
dust28–13-0.0531%28 May
inferno13–80.0125%27 May
anubis13–9-0.0120%27 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →