cubapeachtopleftcorner

cubapeachtopleftcorner — CS2 Stats

CO76561198274596845[U:1:314331117]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

287Tracked matches48%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,562Top 25% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#42996 of 220540 tracked
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 28 days played since 9 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,562 +5,517 9 May9 Sept · 27 days played
14,72024,391peak 24,3919 May9 Sept
24,742Peak Premier in tracked matches
28Days played since 2026-05-09

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,829 below peak (24,391)
  • +7,842 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 2,438 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-05
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGcubapeachtopleftcornerFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER22,562 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning48
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49492Last 10049%Win rateLWLLWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.4pp headshot accuracy · −21ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 493ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 504ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility4.1
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning4.8
Utility4.1
Mechanics3.7
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact4.4

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time514ms−58ms
first ⅓ avg 572ms → last ⅓ avg 514ms
Headshot accuracy18.8%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 18.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–6 · anubis, 23 Jul
45%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · mirage, 12 Jul
305msFastest reaction time · 1–13 · mirage, 12 Jul
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 29 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
64In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 57% over 7nukeWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B28141450%-0.01
mirageB24131154%0.01
ancientB1910953%0.00
anubisC104640%0.01
nukeD103730%-0.00
cacheA74357%0.01
inferno21150%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

74Matches
42%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
65.3ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis30%0.6411.7
Mirage250%0.7210.5
Dust2250%1.2518.0
Ancient10%1.2024.0
Inferno10%0.7311.0
Nuke10%0.538.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
29.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.3%Spray accuracy
66.6%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
515msReaction time
28.7%T opening success
51.4%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
2.5%Flash assists
6.70HE damage / grenade
7.55Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4196 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.7303% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust214–16-0.0421%9 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0113%8 Sept
anubis13–160.0117%8 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0424%8 Sept
dust213–80.0822%8 Sept
anubis10–130.0113%8 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0412%8 Sept
ancient13–110.0521%8 Sept
dust211–13-0.0415%1 Sept
ancient13–8-0.0122%1 Sept
anubis15–150.0221%31 Aug
dust211–130.0930%31 Aug
dust27–13-0.0415%30 Aug
mirage13–30.0315%30 Aug
anubis13–60.0926%30 Aug
nuke9–13-0.049%30 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0121%30 Aug
dust213–7-0.098%29 Aug
dust213–1-0.0218%29 Aug
mirage8–130.0322%29 Aug
mirage7–2-0.0238%29 Aug
dust213–90.1022%29 Aug
mirage13–1-0.036%29 Aug
dust26–13-0.0712%28 Aug
dust22–13-0.0713%27 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0317%27 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0719%27 Aug
dust213–90.0531%27 Aug
nuke13–90.0221%26 Aug
nuke13–100.0121%26 Aug
mirage10–130.0035%26 Aug
anubis13–110.0111%25 Aug
ancient13–40.0213%25 Aug
mirage10–130.0320%25 Aug
dust23–13-0.0214%25 Aug
dust213–70.0310%24 Jul
cache13–80.0212%24 Jul
cache13–80.0322%24 Jul
mirage6–130.0618%23 Jul
anubis13–60.1821%23 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0015%23 Jul
dust213–50.0419%23 Jul
mirage4–130.0933%22 Jul
cache13–110.0821%22 Jul
cache0–13-0.0610%22 Jul
cache13–8-0.0216%22 Jul
mirage8–13-0.017%22 Jul
mirage13–90.0424%22 Jul
dust26–13-0.019%19 Jul
mirage11–130.0117%19 Jul
ancient6–130.0520%19 Jul
dust27–13-0.0620%19 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0213%19 Jul
ancient13–60.0324%19 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0118%18 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0124%18 Jul
dust20–4-0.080%18 Jul
mirage9–20.0317%18 Jul
dust213–8-0.0330%18 Jul
cache3–130.0220%17 Jul
dust29–13-0.0215%17 Jul
mirage13–60.027%17 Jul
ancient13–110.0215%16 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0412%16 Jul
mirage13–40.0422%16 Jul
nuke10–130.0721%16 Jul
dust213–16-0.0417%14 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0645%12 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0118%12 Jul
nuke13–110.0217%12 Jul
anubis2–13-0.1112%12 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0718%12 Jul
dust213–10-0.0129%12 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0517%12 Jul
nuke8–130.0426%11 Jul
cache9–130.0221%11 Jul
dust213–6-0.0315%11 Jul
ancient1–60.0510%11 Jul
dust213–50.0817%11 Jul
mirage13–100.0215%11 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0725%10 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0521%10 Jul
ancient6–13-0.055%9 Jul
dust213–70.0126%9 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0113%9 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0314%9 Jul
dust216–140.0416%9 Jul
dust215–150.0520%5 Jul
ancient9–130.0317%5 Jul
ancient13–40.119%5 Jul
mirage10–130.0414%5 Jul
dust27–13-0.0313%20 Jun
mirage13–50.0113%14 Jun
ancient13–100.0116%13 Jun
mirage13–16-0.059%10 May
mirage13–50.0817%10 May
nuke0–6-0.080%10 May
nuke9–130.0021%10 May
ancient13–8-0.044%9 May
dust213–9-0.0524%9 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →