Crow

Crow — CS2 Stats

76561198271907324[U:1:311641596]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

740Tracked matches34%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,993Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7004 of 22419 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,465 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCrowFACEITLevel 7 · 1,465 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER21,993 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim93
Positioning46
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48466Last 10048%Win rateWLLWLLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim9.3
Aggression3.2
Utility6.0
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafing

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 93 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 95% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 47 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 555ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.3
Positioning4.6
Utility6.0
Mechanics10.0
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact0.0

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time557ms−47ms
first ⅓ avg 604ms → last ⅓ avg 557ms
Headshot accuracy18.0%−3.1%
first ⅓ avg 21.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — mirage 13–5
130Biggest win — inferno
6Longest win streak
76In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 69% over 13dust2Weakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC1881044%0.03
cacheB168850%0.01
dust2D1551033%0.00
mirageC156940%0.03
nukeS139469%0.02
ancientC114736%-0.00
anubisS96367%0.01
train220100%0.07
vertigo1010%-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

179Matches
52%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
81.0ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3142%1.0115.0
Dust22857%1.1817.3
Inferno1963%1.3018.6
Anubis1850%1.1718.9
Ancient1833%1.0814.5
Nuke1233%0.8213.9
Vertigo850%0.8816.0
Overpass425%1.2419.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.0%Headshot accuracy
41.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.4%Spray accuracy
94.9%Counter-strafing
7.8°Preaim
555msReaction time
29.7%T opening success
39.9%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
7.8%Flash assists
8.16HE damage / grenade
9.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.6713% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–40.0329%27 Aug
inferno6–130.0120%26 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0711%25 Aug
dust213–80.0524%23 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0015%23 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0511%22 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0116%22 Aug
anubis13–80.0814%21 Aug
dust210–13-0.0214%21 Aug
mirage13–50.1330%20 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0114%20 Aug
cache8–13-0.0216%20 Aug
dust211–130.0822%20 Aug
mirage13–110.0318%19 Aug
ancient16–130.0410%19 Aug
ancient5–13-0.058%19 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0116%18 Aug
mirage10–130.0125%18 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0120%18 Aug
nuke13–30.0722%17 Aug
cache8–130.0119%17 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0114%14 Aug
dust213–100.0320%14 Aug
inferno12–160.0030%12 Aug
ancient13–50.0220%12 Aug
dust210–13-0.0322%11 Aug
mirage6–130.0114%10 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0318%10 Aug
dust27–13-0.0716%10 Aug
inferno6–130.0314%10 Aug
nuke13–80.0117%10 Aug
inferno13–90.0419%9 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0114%9 Aug
cache12–12-0.0118%9 Aug
vertigo8–13-0.1022%9 Aug
dust27–130.0120%9 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0229%9 Aug
nuke13–70.0213%7 Aug
cache13–70.0413%7 Aug
cache3–13-0.0322%6 Aug
dust26–13-0.0512%6 Aug
anubis13–80.0816%6 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0236%5 Aug
mirage5–130.0118%5 Aug
anubis13–50.0823%5 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0617%3 Aug
cache16–14-0.0116%3 Aug
train13–90.0538%3 Aug
anubis16–120.0020%2 Aug
cache6–1-0.0127%2 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0539%2 Aug
mirage16–130.0815%2 Aug
nuke13–80.0618%29 Jul
dust213–90.0221%27 Jul
inferno13–110.0723%26 Jul
inferno11–130.0725%24 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0318%24 Jul
anubis3–9-0.0450%23 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0236%23 Jul
cache13–8-0.0420%22 Jul
nuke13–80.0323%21 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0228%20 Jul
ancient13–70.0229%17 Jul
mirage12–120.0425%14 Jul
cache9–130.0232%10 Jul
cache13–70.0818%10 Jul
ancient13–40.0932%9 Jul
dust213–60.1029%3 Jul
mirage13–110.0211%2 Jul
cache13–70.0119%2 Jul
dust213–11-0.0121%29 Jun
cache6–13-0.0119%28 Jun
ancient0–3-0.070%27 Jun
inferno16–120.0316%27 Jun
cache11–130.0313%27 Jun
dust211–13-0.0424%26 Jun
inferno13–2-0.0125%26 Jun
dust212–12-0.0422%25 Jun
mirage13–20.0729%25 Jun
nuke10–130.0715%21 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0026%10 Jun
dust210–130.0124%8 Jun
ancient3–130.0316%28 May
inferno13–80.1322%26 May
mirage8–13-0.0134%26 May
nuke13–10-0.0019%26 May
cache12–120.0421%25 May
inferno7–130.0320%25 May
train13–60.0922%25 May
mirage13–50.0629%24 May
dust29–13-0.0418%24 May
inferno10–130.1021%20 May
anubis6–13-0.0124%18 May
inferno13–7-0.0021%18 May
inferno13–00.0617%18 May
mirage5–130.0434%14 May
anubis12–12-0.0321%14 May
nuke8–10.0625%14 May
inferno13–110.1110%14 May
cache13–70.0525%14 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →