readem — CS2 Stats

76561198271285180[U:1:311019452]Steam profile ↗

4,129Tracked matches70%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.7 SolidAggressive Rifler

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,016 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77

Positioning54

Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT55–45Last 10055%Win rateWWWLWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.7

Aggression8.6

Utility6.0

Positioning5.4

Opening Duels3.2

Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.76 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 605ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7

Positioning5.4

Utility6.0

Mechanics7.3

Opening Duels3.2

Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.03

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time612ms+43ms

first ⅓ avg 569ms → last ⅓ avg 612ms

Headshot accuracy16.4%−2.5%

first ⅓ avg 18.9% → last ⅓ avg 16.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — nuke 13–4

13–0Biggest win — inferno

11Longest win streak

W3Current streak

19–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

14Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 10ancientWeakest map · 47% over 32

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
ancient	B	32	15–17	47%	0.02
mirage	A	23	14–9	61%	0.01
inferno	B	17	8–9	47%	0.00
nuke	B	13	7–6	54%	0.02
cache	S	10	8–2	80%	0.03
overpass	—	3	2–1	67%	-0.02
dust2	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.03
anubis	—	1	0–1	0%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (47% over 32). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,880Matches

50%Win rate

1.10Avg K/D

82.2ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

30%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	157	50%	1.14	17.4
Mirage	150	51%	1.17	18.1
Overpass	78	60%	1.22	17.0
Nuke	68	47%	1.21	18.2
Inferno	57	42%	1.09	16.0
Vertigo	49	49%	1.23	19.1
Dust2	21	33%	0.85	14.4
Anubis	13	23%	0.98	15.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.2%Headshot accuracy

38.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.5%Spray accuracy

83.0%Counter-strafing

8.9°Preaim

605msReaction time

34.8%T opening success

51.1%CT opening success

0.76Enemies flashed / flash

5.6%Flash assists

7.33HE damage / grenade

8.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 34.8481% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

47% win rate across 32 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	13–9	0.01	13%	26 Jul →
cache	16–13	0.11	16%	26 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.03	13%	21 Jul →
nuke	0–13	-0.08	6%	21 Jul →
nuke	13–3	-0.01	37%	21 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.01	14%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.05	5%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.06	32%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.06	16%	10 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.07	16%	20 May →
cache	13–9	0.05	22%	20 May →
nuke	13–9	0.02	10%	20 May →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	17%	20 May →
ancient	16–14	0.01	23%	19 May →
cache	13–4	0.08	14%	19 May →
ancient	13–10	0.02	25%	19 May →
inferno	16–14	0.01	26%	19 May →
nuke	10–13	-0.00	7%	18 May →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	11%	18 May →
mirage	13–9	0.03	17%	18 May →
mirage	13–11	0.01	16%	18 May →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	14%	18 May →
mirage	8–13	0.00	21%	17 May →
ancient	4–13	-0.02	8%	17 May →
overpass	19–17	-0.03	12%	17 May →
ancient	7–13	0.00	9%	17 May →
ancient	13–8	0.01	13%	17 May →
ancient	13–6	0.06	14%	17 May →
inferno	13–10	0.00	22%	17 May →
ancient	11–13	-0.00	18%	16 May →
nuke	6–13	-0.03	19%	16 May →
inferno	13–3	-0.02	21%	16 May →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	15%	16 May →
mirage	16–14	0.00	13%	16 May →
inferno	3–13	-0.11	8%	16 May →
ancient	13–2	0.08	18%	16 May →
overpass	19–17	-0.04	17%	16 May →
nuke	13–10	0.02	22%	15 May →
dust2	13–11	-0.03	17%	15 May →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	10%	15 May →
inferno	5–13	0.03	18%	15 May →
anubis	11–13	0.01	18%	15 May →
ancient	9–13	0.00	16%	15 May →
inferno	14–16	0.02	13%	15 May →
nuke	19–16	-0.00	14%	15 May →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	35%	15 May →
mirage	13–6	0.02	18%	15 May →
ancient	10–13	-0.03	22%	15 May →
ancient	13–9	0.04	18%	15 May →
inferno	14–16	-0.02	13%	14 May →
ancient	10–13	-0.02	13%	14 May →
cache	13–4	0.07	14%	14 May →
nuke	13–11	0.04	27%	14 May →
mirage	13–8	0.05	20%	14 May →
ancient	13–3	0.09	25%	14 May →
inferno	14–16	-0.01	13%	14 May →
ancient	13–6	0.05	10%	14 May →
inferno	13–6	0.01	26%	13 May →
ancient	2–13	-0.07	9%	13 May →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	14%	13 May →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	16%	13 May →
ancient	13–1	0.09	13%	13 May →
mirage	8–13	0.05	19%	13 May →
ancient	13–4	0.06	18%	13 May →
ancient	13–8	0.03	8%	13 May →
inferno	11–13	-0.05	20%	13 May →
ancient	22–25	-0.00	13%	13 May →
ancient	8–13	-0.03	9%	13 May →
cache	13–11	0.03	13%	12 May →
inferno	13–5	0.13	17%	12 May →
ancient	16–13	-0.02	13%	12 May →
nuke	13–4	0.13	13%	12 May →
inferno	6–13	-0.05	15%	12 May →
ancient	19–17	0.07	19%	12 May →
ancient	11–13	0.01	17%	12 May →
overpass	8–13	0.02	15%	12 May →
nuke	11–13	0.01	18%	12 May →
inferno	14–16	0.07	24%	11 May →
mirage	13–11	0.07	26%	11 May →
ancient	6–13	0.08	20%	11 May →
nuke	10–13	0.04	15%	11 May →
inferno	13–0	0.06	16%	11 May →
mirage	13–11	0.04	12%	11 May →
ancient	10–13	0.03	10%	11 May →
mirage	9–13	-0.06	7%	11 May →
ancient	13–7	0.07	24%	11 May →
mirage	13–4	0.01	22%	11 May →
mirage	1–10	-0.04	13%	11 May →
ancient	13–11	0.01	19%	10 May →
nuke	8–13	0.08	21%	10 May →
cache	2–13	-0.06	26%	10 May →
ancient	11–13	0.02	20%	10 May →
mirage	13–11	0.13	26%	10 May →
ancient	10–13	0.05	26%	10 May →
cache	10–13	0.05	22%	9 May →
cache	13–9	0.04	42%	9 May →
ancient	7–13	-0.00	23%	9 May →
ancient	5–13	-0.03	19%	9 May →
cache	13–3	-0.02	29%	9 May →
inferno	11–13	0.02	12%	9 May →