Larzka♿

Larzka♿ — CS2 Stats

FI76561198271230810[U:1:310965082]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,636Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.7 LearningSupport
Premier CS Rating13,340Blue band · top ~37.2% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 18 days played since 19 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,340 +759 26 Aug18 Sept · 11 days played
11,92513,555peak 13,55526 Aug18 Sept
13,555Peak Premier in tracked matches
763Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
18Days played since 2026-08-19

Premier CS Rating

  • 215 below peak (13,555)
  • +759 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 1,660 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLarzka♿FACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER13,340 · Blue bandPEAK ELO763csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim45
Positioning38
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54451Last 10054%Win rateLLWWLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +0.5pp headshot accuracy · −24ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 518ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim4.5
Utility5.0
Positioning3.8
Opening Duels0.2
Clutch2.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Counter-strafing. Only 60% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.5
Positioning3.8
Utility5.0
Mechanics2.2
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact6.1

Composite 3.7/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time569ms+9ms
first ⅓ avg 560ms → last ⅓ avg 569ms
Headshot accuracy17.6%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 18.0% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.09Best match rating · 13–5 · mirage, 10 Sept
40%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · nuke, 11 Sept
359msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · ancient, 18 Sept
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 31 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
106In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 5nukeWeakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB30161453%-0.02
ancientA1911858%-0.01
anubisS1711665%-0.02
nukeD1551033%-0.03
infernoS75271%0.00
cacheS54180%-0.01
dust23030%-0.03
vertigo220100%-0.06
poseidon1010%0.02
debris1010%-0.15

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

458Matches
50%Win rate
0.82Avg K/D
66.4ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage11052%0.8612.1
Ancient7653%0.7711.3
Anubis7155%0.8914.8
Nuke6245%0.8512.6
Inferno3956%0.8813.1
Cache3661%0.7611.1
Vertigo2446%0.8612.1
Dust22326%0.5610.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.6%Headshot accuracy
26.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.9%Spray accuracy
59.8%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
544msReaction time
32.9%T opening success
35.3%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
1.7%Flash assists
10.64HE damage / grenade
6.80Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.8843% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage11–13-0.1015%18 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0913%18 Sept
ancient13–10-0.0713%18 Sept
inferno16–14-0.0413%18 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0114%18 Sept
ancient14–16-0.068%18 Sept
mirage13–70.0029%18 Sept
anubis13–70.0135%16 Sept
mirage13–30.0026%16 Sept
nuke13–60.048%16 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0710%16 Sept
ancient13–80.0517%16 Sept
mirage13–7-0.0217%16 Sept
inferno11–130.0221%15 Sept
ancient13–80.0510%15 Sept
nuke13–9-0.0127%15 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0010%15 Sept
anubis13–100.0216%15 Sept
nuke13–80.0220%14 Sept
anubis5–13-0.0119%14 Sept
mirage2–13-0.0410%14 Sept
anubis5–13-0.0723%12 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0840%11 Sept
anubis13–9-0.0316%11 Sept
poseidon8–80.0221%11 Sept
debris5–9-0.156%11 Sept
ancient13–30.0120%11 Sept
dust28–13-0.0311%11 Sept
anubis13–110.0025%11 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0613%11 Sept
ancient3–13-0.0915%11 Sept
mirage13–80.0125%10 Sept
nuke13–60.0617%10 Sept
anubis16–12-0.0213%10 Sept
cache3–13-0.059%10 Sept
mirage13–50.0918%10 Sept
vertigo13–6-0.0213%10 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0219%10 Sept
ancient16–120.0620%10 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0123%10 Sept
cache13–7-0.0411%10 Sept
dust210–13-0.0330%10 Sept
vertigo13–5-0.0920%10 Sept
ancient8–13-0.006%9 Sept
inferno13–40.0321%9 Sept
mirage13–9-0.0414%9 Sept
cache13–40.009%1 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0311%1 Sept
ancient4–13-0.0615%1 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0416%1 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0212%1 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0525%1 Sept
nuke3–13-0.0822%1 Sept
mirage16–13-0.0413%1 Sept
inferno13–100.0111%31 Aug
nuke16–14-0.0517%31 Aug
ancient13–20.028%31 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0623%31 Aug
nuke10–13-0.033%31 Aug
anubis16–14-0.0221%31 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0513%31 Aug
ancient16–14-0.0419%31 Aug
nuke5–13-0.1133%31 Aug
inferno13–110.0014%28 Aug
mirage13–10-0.069%28 Aug
nuke10–13-0.038%28 Aug
anubis19–150.0015%28 Aug
mirage13–100.0220%28 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0427%28 Aug
dust27–13-0.0220%27 Aug
inferno11–13-0.037%27 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0212%27 Aug
ancient9–13-0.019%27 Aug
mirage13–100.0228%27 Aug
anubis19–15-0.0313%27 Aug
ancient13–110.0130%27 Aug
mirage5–130.0117%26 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0112%26 Aug
ancient13–30.0511%25 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0514%25 Aug
cache13–60.0333%25 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0614%24 Aug
anubis5–13-0.005%24 Aug
mirage13–70.0422%24 Aug
mirage11–13-0.049%24 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0533%24 Aug
anubis13–80.0425%24 Aug
cache13–80.0213%21 Aug
ancient13–3-0.067%21 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0510%21 Aug
anubis16–140.0016%21 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0120%21 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0821%21 Aug
mirage19–170.0020%21 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0913%21 Aug
mirage13–90.0535%20 Aug
ancient13–40.0122%20 Aug
inferno16–140.0222%20 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0517%20 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0718%19 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →