Washed Roberto

Washed Roberto — CS2 Stats

76561198271068260[U:1:310802532]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

388Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating20,871Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#62634 of 222109 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 26 Aug 2026 (22 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 32 days played since 6 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,871 +3,360 6 Mar26 Aug · 24 days played
16,83621,169peak 21,1696 Mar26 Aug
21,169Peak Premier in tracked matches
32Days played since 2026-03-06

Premier CS Rating

  • 298 below peak (21,169)
  • -182 over 30 days · steady
  • +3,083 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,129 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGWashed RobertoFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER20,871 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim62
Positioning34
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT52453Last 10052%Win rateWLWLWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −5.6pp headshot accuracy · −50ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 10

  • 73 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3 against its own average).

Aim6.2
Utility6.0
Positioning3.4
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch2.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 36% on CT to 17% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 604ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.2
Positioning3.4
Utility6.0
Mechanics4.9
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time599ms−34ms
first ⅓ avg 633ms → last ⅓ avg 599ms
Headshot accuracy23.4%+3.7%
first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 23.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 9–7 · inferno, 28 Apr
100%Best headshot accuracy · 2–0 · ancient, 22 Jul
375msFastest reaction time · 13–1 · dust2, 27 Jun
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 27 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
1010In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 9infernoWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB26131350%-0.01
dust2A159660%-0.01
anubisB147750%-0.01
infernoC135838%0.02
nukeB105550%0.01
cacheS96367%0.02
ancientC73443%0.02
overpass43175%0.02
vertigo110100%-0.00
stronghold1010%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

35Matches
46%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
79.2ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
38%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage944%1.3216.3
Inferno580%1.5621.6
Cache425%0.9218.3
Dust2475%1.1919.8
Ancient425%1.0716.8
Vertigo367%1.0417.0
Nuke333%1.2215.7
Anubis30%0.8817.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.8%Headshot accuracy
33.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.3%Spray accuracy
71.9%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
604msReaction time
16.9%T opening success
36.4%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
6.0%Flash assists
8.82HE damage / grenade
23.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4691 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 16.8647% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–50.049%1 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0528%31 Aug
mirage13–30.0817%26 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0113%26 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0112%26 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0216%26 Aug
cache13–7-0.0311%25 Aug
dust213–40.0114%25 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0126%25 Aug
vertigo13–7-0.0016%25 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0221%20 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0522%20 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0510%19 Aug
cache10–13-0.0117%19 Aug
cache16–13-0.0228%17 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0113%17 Aug
mirage3–3-0.0129%13 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0327%9 Aug
cache16–14-0.0416%24 Jul
ancient5–130.0333%24 Jul
cache13–110.0326%24 Jul
mirage5–130.0032%23 Jul
anubis13–90.0929%23 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0331%22 Jul
ancient2–00.00100%22 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0524%22 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0318%22 Jul
cache4–13-0.0119%22 Jul
mirage13–70.0030%22 Jul
ancient7–130.0116%21 Jul
dust216–13-0.0320%21 Jul
anubis13–60.0125%21 Jul
dust213–110.0726%21 Jul
dust24–13-0.1123%21 Jul
anubis13–50.0221%21 Jul
mirage15–150.1024%21 Jul
dust29–13-0.1019%21 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0820%21 Jul
anubis11–130.0123%21 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0312%20 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0034%20 Jul
mirage13–40.0913%20 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0424%19 Jul
cache13–90.0414%19 Jul
cache13–20.2015%19 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0624%10 Jul
cache11–130.0126%10 Jul
nuke3–9-0.1322%6 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0112%6 Jul
ancient6–130.0021%6 Jul
overpass9–130.0014%29 Jun
ancient13–80.0417%28 Jun
overpass13–20.0416%28 Jun
mirage9–130.046%28 Jun
mirage13–80.0129%28 Jun
mirage13–90.0828%28 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0918%28 Jun
anubis13–110.0222%28 Jun
dust213–10.0610%27 Jun
dust213–10.0211%27 Jun
dust211–13-0.0515%27 Jun
mirage3–13-0.1113%27 Jun
dust211–130.0317%27 Jun
dust213–8-0.0810%27 Jun
inferno12–12-0.0336%8 Jun
dust210–13-0.0322%18 May
anubis3–13-0.0514%17 May
overpass13–80.0121%17 May
dust213–60.0929%17 May
nuke9–60.1424%17 May
inferno4–9-0.057%17 May
mirage9–13-0.0622%17 May
dust28–13-0.0627%1 May
mirage13–9-0.0519%1 May
inferno2–13-0.0610%1 May
nuke5–20.047%1 May
anubis11–13-0.0314%1 May
mirage2–13-0.0621%1 May
dust213–60.0613%29 Apr
nuke13–30.1114%28 Apr
inferno13–20.0715%28 Apr
anubis6–13-0.0515%28 Apr
ancient16–120.0114%28 Apr
inferno9–70.2541%28 Apr
mirage16–130.1022%28 Apr
stronghold1–13-0.0815%13 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0019%13 Apr
overpass13–90.0218%13 Apr
anubis13–100.0015%13 Apr
nuke13–90.0036%27 Mar
inferno13–40.0820%27 Mar
nuke9–130.0421%27 Mar
inferno10–130.0020%27 Mar
dust213–11-0.0220%25 Mar
ancient14–160.0119%25 Mar
mirage13–60.0320%25 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0125%10 Mar
inferno9–60.1323%8 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0619%6 Mar
mirage13–16-0.0526%6 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →