CoryTrevor

CoryTrevor — CS2 Stats

CA76561198269472580[U:1:309206852]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,345Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating25,003Top 25% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#18875 of 221191 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 40 days played since 23 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,003 +2,606 23 Jul16 Sept · 42 days played
21,30926,700peak 26,70023 Jul16 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,237 +0 30 Aug4 Sept · 3 observations
2,2372,237peak 2,23730 Aug4 Sept
27,131Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,237Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2026-07-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,237
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 263 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,697 below peak (26,700)
  • +4 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 4,997 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCoryTrevorPREMIER25,003 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,237csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning49
Utility30

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD56431Last 10056%Win rateLLLWLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −8.3pp headshot accuracy · −13ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim9.0
Utility3.0
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels3.1
Clutch2.6

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 41 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning4.9
Utility3.0
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time551ms−34ms
first ⅓ avg 585ms → last ⅓ avg 551ms
Headshot accuracy21.9%+3.4%
first ⅓ avg 18.6% → last ⅓ avg 21.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–6 · mirage, 8 Aug
67%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · mirage, 9 Sept
375msFastest reaction time · 10–13 · office, 14 Sept
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 25 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L3Current streak
75In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 70% over 10infernoWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A26161062%0.01
mirageB178947%0.01
nukeB136746%0.00
cacheA138562%0.01
anubisA117464%0.01
ancientS107370%0.02
infernoD72529%0.01
office21150%0.02
vertigo110100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,243Matches
53%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
78.8ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage20454%1.0415.9
Ancient11446%0.9815.6
Anubis10457%1.1016.4
Dust26853%1.0516.1
Nuke6851%1.0416.7
Inferno3738%0.9214.8
Overpass2564%1.2017.0
Cache1136%1.1216.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.2%Headshot accuracy
40.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.9%Spray accuracy
86.0%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
550msReaction time
35.4%T opening success
40.2%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
3.1%Flash assists
7.82HE damage / grenade
2.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4234 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.3916% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust24–13-0.0225%16 Sept
anubis1–13-0.0816%16 Sept
office10–13-0.0014%14 Sept
dust213–90.0718%14 Sept
nuke5–13-0.0518%12 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0318%12 Sept
nuke9–13-0.0016%11 Sept
dust24–13-0.0519%11 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0029%11 Sept
dust26–13-0.0210%10 Sept
anubis13–2-0.0118%9 Sept
cache7–13-0.0418%9 Sept
ancient13–3-0.0419%9 Sept
mirage0–13-0.1067%9 Sept
nuke13–4-0.098%8 Sept
dust25–1-0.0743%8 Sept
dust22–13-0.0230%8 Sept
cache13–90.0619%5 Sept
office13–80.0421%5 Sept
anubis4–13-0.0823%5 Sept
dust21–13-0.0763%5 Sept
anubis13–80.0911%5 Sept
mirage13–110.0012%5 Sept
anubis10–130.0416%3 Sept
dust213–30.0118%3 Sept
mirage13–100.0215%3 Sept
cache13–110.009%29 Aug
dust25–13-0.079%27 Aug
nuke11–130.0526%27 Aug
dust213–40.0826%25 Aug
mirage13–1-0.0216%25 Aug
inferno0–10-0.0329%25 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0425%23 Aug
dust213–60.048%23 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0120%22 Aug
mirage13–20.0425%22 Aug
inferno13–20.0625%22 Aug
dust213–110.0716%21 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0220%21 Aug
cache13–110.0412%20 Aug
dust213–80.0115%19 Aug
cache13–8-0.0131%17 Aug
mirage0–13-0.097%17 Aug
dust213–30.0113%17 Aug
nuke13–100.0222%15 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0522%14 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0613%13 Aug
dust213–10.1133%13 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0513%13 Aug
ancient13–60.0522%13 Aug
inferno13–80.0213%13 Aug
dust210–13-0.0319%13 Aug
anubis13–100.0111%12 Aug
dust213–110.0326%12 Aug
mirage13–20.0826%10 Aug
dust213–100.0416%10 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0427%10 Aug
mirage13–40.0514%10 Aug
dust20–13-0.0917%9 Aug
anubis13–10.028%9 Aug
cache7–13-0.0119%9 Aug
cache6–13-0.0618%8 Aug
inferno3–6-0.0313%8 Aug
nuke13–70.0525%8 Aug
mirage13–60.2024%8 Aug
nuke13–20.1522%8 Aug
dust213–6-0.0130%8 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0117%8 Aug
ancient11–130.0219%7 Aug
anubis13–70.0315%6 Aug
nuke5–130.0231%5 Aug
ancient13–20.0616%5 Aug
cache9–13-0.0219%4 Aug
dust213–40.0418%4 Aug
inferno7–130.0120%3 Aug
cache13–20.029%3 Aug
dust213–30.0925%3 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0212%2 Aug
mirage11–130.0422%2 Aug
dust213–100.0419%2 Aug
mirage5–130.0619%1 Aug
cache13–80.0417%1 Aug
anubis13–80.0817%31 Jul
mirage11–130.0218%31 Jul
dust22–130.0026%31 Jul
ancient15–150.0722%31 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0615%30 Jul
vertigo13–70.0520%29 Jul
mirage10–130.0016%29 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0729%28 Jul
dust213–11-0.0111%27 Jul
inferno10–130.0320%27 Jul
ancient16–140.0111%27 Jul
ancient13–90.0920%27 Jul
anubis13–80.0818%25 Jul
dust29–13-0.0213%25 Jul
cache8–20.0519%25 Jul
nuke9–130.0014%24 Jul
cache13–100.0527%24 Jul
cache9–13-0.0419%23 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →