zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz — CS2 Stats

76561198266290430[U:1:306024702]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,977Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.0 StrongAggressive Rifler

FaceitLevel 10 · 3,517 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87

Positioning63

Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT44–55–1Last 10044%Win rateWLWWWLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.7

Aggression8.0

Utility6.1

Positioning6.3

Opening Duels3.2

Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7

Positioning6.3

Utility6.1

Mechanics6.1

Opening Duels3.6

Win Impact6.1

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time516ms−43ms

first ⅓ avg 558ms → last ⅓ avg 516ms

Headshot accuracy23.7%+1.2%

first ⅓ avg 22.5% → last ⅓ avg 23.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — nuke 13–8

13–1Biggest win — nuke

6Longest win streak

7–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 55% over 20nukeWeakest map · 31% over 16

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	32	12–20	38%	0.01
dust2	A	20	11–9	55%	0.03
nuke	D	16	5–11	31%	-0.00
ancient	B	13	7–6	54%	0.00
inferno	C	10	4–6	40%	0.00
anubis	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.06
overpass	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.01
warden	—	2	2–0	100%	0.02
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	0.03
stronghold	—	1	1–0	100%	0.03
alpine	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

7,732Matches

51%Win rate

1.13Avg K/D

78.4ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

21%1v2 clutch win

17Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	924	55%	1.17	16.4
Ancient	525	51%	1.09	15.4
Dust2	442	50%	1.15	16.1
Anubis	431	52%	1.13	16.5
Nuke	266	53%	1.13	15.8
Inferno	195	55%	1.17	16.0
Vertigo	81	57%	1.20	16.5
Overpass	35	54%	1.09	13.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.9%Headshot accuracy

37.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

42.3%Spray accuracy

77.5%Counter-strafing

9.0°Preaim

510msReaction time

26.6%T opening success

58.9%CT opening success

0.71Enemies flashed / flash

8.4%Flash assists

6.64HE damage / grenade

13.67Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 26.5589% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	16–12	-0.01	25%	23 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.01	18%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.03	22%	16 Aug →
vertigo	13–11	0.03	33%	5 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.03	17%	30 Jul →
mirage	12–16	-0.02	26%	30 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.06	10%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.08	50%	25 Jul →
nuke	13–9	-0.00	32%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.00	18%	26 Jun →
ancient	22–18	0.05	13%	26 Jun →
overpass	3–13	-0.01	6%	26 Jun →
ancient	10–13	0.04	14%	26 Jun →
dust2	13–2	0.06	21%	24 Jun →
ancient	13–2	0.09	33%	24 Jun →
nuke	7–13	-0.08	11%	5 Jun →
dust2	13–6	0.09	8%	19 May →
nuke	13–1	0.04	22%	19 May →
mirage	8–13	0.07	27%	29 Apr →
nuke	4–13	-0.01	30%	29 Apr →
overpass	4–13	-0.01	27%	22 Apr →
nuke	13–9	0.10	21%	18 Apr →
nuke	1–13	-0.02	39%	18 Apr →
mirage	5–13	0.05	22%	18 Apr →
nuke	13–6	-0.00	26%	14 Apr →
mirage	16–12	0.00	19%	7 Apr →
dust2	7–13	0.10	22%	2 Apr →
ancient	1–13	-0.04	50%	2 Apr →
ancient	6–13	-0.04	25%	1 Apr →
mirage	4–13	0.02	26%	1 Apr →
dust2	13–8	0.05	27%	1 Apr →
nuke	13–8	0.14	26%	1 Apr →
nuke	13–16	-0.02	13%	30 Mar →
mirage	9–13	0.03	29%	30 Mar →
inferno	13–9	0.03	25%	28 Mar →
mirage	13–2	0.04	25%	28 Mar →
mirage	13–3	0.06	12%	28 Mar →
dust2	13–9	0.09	25%	28 Mar →
mirage	13–7	0.09	31%	27 Mar →
inferno	13–6	0.12	21%	27 Mar →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	27%	25 Mar →
ancient	16–12	-0.04	26%	25 Mar →
dust2	16–13	0.04	33%	22 Mar →
dust2	13–10	-0.03	18%	22 Mar →
mirage	4–13	-0.04	13%	21 Mar →
ancient	13–8	0.03	15%	20 Mar →
nuke	5–13	-0.05	31%	17 Mar →
ancient	10–13	-0.03	20%	16 Mar →
dust2	10–13	0.11	45%	14 Mar →
mirage	13–8	-0.00	22%	13 Mar →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	14%	11 Mar →
inferno	6–13	-0.03	20%	3 Mar →
mirage	4–13	-0.11	11%	3 Mar →
mirage	7–13	-0.07	35%	2 Mar →
nuke	4–13	-0.07	27%	2 Mar →
dust2	3–13	-0.01	29%	2 Mar →
nuke	4–13	-0.03	22%	27 Feb →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	28%	27 Feb →
mirage	3–13	-0.02	17%	25 Feb →
nuke	5–13	-0.03	12%	25 Feb →
mirage	10–13	-0.05	27%	16 Feb →
dust2	0–3	-0.10	0%	16 Feb →
dust2	7–5	-0.01	7%	15 Feb →
ancient	4–13	-0.06	11%	15 Feb →
inferno	13–10	0.07	23%	14 Feb →
ancient	13–11	-0.00	20%	14 Feb →
mirage	13–16	-0.00	39%	14 Feb →
dust2	8–13	0.03	29%	14 Feb →
dust2	13–4	0.07	18%	13 Feb →
inferno	13–7	-0.05	19%	13 Feb →
dust2	5–13	-0.00	29%	12 Feb →
mirage	9–13	0.02	21%	12 Feb →
ancient	9–13	0.01	15%	12 Feb →
dust2	13–11	0.11	23%	12 Feb →
inferno	8–13	0.03	17%	12 Feb →
dust2	13–5	0.01	50%	11 Feb →
mirage	6–13	0.02	33%	11 Feb →
inferno	6–13	-0.06	22%	11 Feb →
mirage	13–3	0.00	14%	9 Feb →
nuke	8–13	-0.07	13%	8 Feb →
anubis	8–13	-0.06	22%	8 Feb →
ancient	13–9	0.01	25%	5 Feb →
dust2	6–13	-0.02	20%	3 Feb →
mirage	11–13	0.05	21%	3 Feb →
nuke	11–13	0.10	24%	2 Feb →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	15%	2 Feb →
dust2	13–9	0.00	21%	2 Feb →
mirage	13–9	-0.04	33%	29 Jan →
warden	13–5	-0.04	13%	25 Jan →
stronghold	13–3	0.03	30%	24 Jan →
alpine	12–12	-0.07	23%	24 Jan →
warden	13–2	0.08	31%	24 Jan →
nuke	5–13	-0.00	22%	20 Jan →
dust2	4–13	-0.01	25%	20 Jan →
dust2	14–16	0.01	22%	20 Jan →
mirage	7–13	0.04	32%	20 Jan →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	7%	19 Jan →
inferno	2–13	-0.05	14%	19 Jan →
mirage	13–11	0.01	7%	19 Jan →
inferno	11–13	-0.02	30%	18 Jan →