Lizardus

Lizardus — CS2 Stats

76561198263055819[U:1:302790091]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,916Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,768 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,916 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 69 days played since 15 Jun 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,203 +1,327 17 Jun3 Nov · 12 days played
18,55121,203peak 21,20317 Jun3 Nov
21,203Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,768Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
69Days played since 2025-06-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,768
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 232 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-09-15
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-15

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLizardusFACEITLevel 10 · 2,768 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,768csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning50
Utility55

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD5347Last 10053%Win rateLLLLWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +0.4pp headshot accuracy · −80ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 39%
  • Avg reaction 475ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 517ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 31%
  • Avg reaction 557ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility5.5
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels3.6
Clutch3.4

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 563ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning5.0
Utility5.5
Mechanics4.9
Opening Duels2.9
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time559ms−20ms
first ⅓ avg 579ms → last ⅓ avg 559ms
Headshot accuracy28.6%+1.0%
first ⅓ avg 27.6% → last ⅓ avg 28.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–1 · dust2, 13 Aug
67%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · mirage, 14 Aug
375msFastest reaction time · 1–9 · overpass, 22 Jun
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 13 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L4Current streak
89In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 79% over 14nukeWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA33211264%0.02
dust2C1761135%0.01
ancientB147750%0.03
infernoS1411379%0.02
anubisD82625%-0.00
overpassA74357%0.03
nukeD51420%-0.01
cache1010%-0.07
vertigo110100%0.15

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

7,156Matches
50%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
78.2ADR
63%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage42554%1.0215.4
Dust229751%0.9715.2
Ancient20350%0.9615.2
Inferno16954%1.0015.9
Anubis12944%1.0015.8
Nuke6743%0.9014.7
Overpass5847%1.0216.0
Vertigo3549%1.0215.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.3%Headshot accuracy
32.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.9%Spray accuracy
71.9%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
563msReaction time
36.9%T opening success
46.4%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
9.03HE damage / grenade
7.18Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.868% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis4–130.0234%27 Aug
ancient9–130.0435%27 Aug
ancient11–130.0025%15 Aug
anubis11–130.1033%15 Aug
mirage13–50.1167%14 Aug
dust213–10.1730%13 Aug
cache4–13-0.0712%12 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0722%28 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0519%28 Jul
mirage13–60.0632%26 Jul
mirage13–30.1240%26 Jul
dust211–13-0.0240%19 Jul
dust27–130.0636%18 Jul
anubis13–8-0.0136%17 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0135%16 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0113%8 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0421%6 Jul
mirage19–150.0226%6 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0236%3 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0421%30 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0535%22 Jun
ancient13–110.0123%21 Jun
ancient13–90.0215%18 Jun
overpass8–13-0.0516%18 Jun
dust213–16-0.0326%17 Jun
dust214–16-0.0628%15 Jun
mirage13–2-0.0424%13 Jun
dust210–3-0.0630%29 May
inferno16–14-0.0422%20 May
inferno13–3-0.0432%18 May
overpass13–90.0718%13 May
mirage5–130.0228%13 May
dust28–13-0.0633%13 May
mirage22–19-0.0220%12 May
inferno13–110.0616%7 May
mirage13–80.0125%7 May
mirage13–60.0539%5 May
mirage13–50.0728%4 May
nuke12–16-0.0119%3 May
overpass13–6-0.0016%3 Nov
inferno13–60.0832%24 Oct
mirage6–130.0536%23 Oct
dust26–13-0.0141%18 Oct
mirage11–13-0.0219%12 Oct
inferno7–13-0.0428%11 Oct
mirage4–13-0.0120%10 Oct
nuke5–13-0.0216%10 Oct
dust29–13-0.0433%10 Oct
inferno11–130.0624%7 Oct
dust213–11-0.0632%7 Oct
nuke13–10-0.0130%6 Oct
mirage16–140.0437%6 Oct
dust213–30.0940%5 Oct
inferno13–110.1337%4 Oct
ancient13–80.0413%27 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0263%16 Sept
mirage3–130.0132%16 Sept
mirage19–150.0143%9 Sept
mirage13–100.0223%5 Sept
ancient13–80.1428%31 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0435%31 Aug
overpass13–30.1433%31 Aug
dust26–13-0.0611%28 Aug
inferno13–90.0228%25 Aug
dust29–130.0539%21 Aug
mirage13–70.0423%19 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0030%19 Aug
ancient16–140.0933%19 Aug
mirage13–90.1138%19 Aug
overpass13–80.1326%18 Aug
mirage13–30.0630%18 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0130%18 Aug
dust213–100.0228%18 Aug
ancient11–130.0427%11 Aug
ancient13–10.0325%10 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0323%9 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0328%9 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0224%8 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0533%8 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0225%4 Aug
mirage13–110.0420%4 Aug
mirage11–130.0427%2 Aug
dust216–120.1032%31 Jul
ancient8–130.0221%31 Jul
dust210–130.0028%30 Jul
overpass13–160.0430%19 Jul
nuke9–130.0028%5 Jul
inferno13–50.0631%26 Jun
anubis16–120.0233%25 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0220%24 Jun
inferno13–100.0433%24 Jun
vertigo5–00.1538%22 Jun
overpass1–9-0.1225%22 Jun
dust24–130.0326%22 Jun
mirage13–40.0430%22 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0321%20 Jun
mirage13–80.0834%20 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0322%17 Jun
inferno13–100.0022%16 Jun
ancient13–70.0121%15 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →