woodie

woodie — CS2 Stats

WF76561198262742515[U:1:302476787]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,329Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidHybrid Rifler
CSDB Leaderboard#11087 of 12715 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,458 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

2,458Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,458
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 42 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGwoodieFACEITLevel 10 · 2,458 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,458csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning54
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56431Last 10056%Win rateLWWWLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.8
Aggression6.1
Utility5.6
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch3.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.4
Utility5.6
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time499ms−57ms
first ⅓ avg 556ms → last ⅓ avg 499ms
Headshot accuracy21.2%−5.0%
first ⅓ avg 26.2% → last ⅓ avg 21.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — ancient 13–1
131Biggest win — ancient
6Longest win streak
1212In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 73% over 15nukeWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS39271269%0.02
dust2S1511473%0.01
anubisC114736%0.00
cacheC94544%0.01
nukeD92722%-0.00
ancientB63350%0.04
overpassA53260%0.01
inferno41325%0.02
vertigo110100%0.06
office1010%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,611Matches
51%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
82.8ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage70653%1.0516.6
Dust227149%1.0215.7
Ancient26952%1.1216.9
Nuke16848%1.0415.8
Vertigo15456%1.1316.9
Anubis13942%1.0517.0
Overpass10260%1.2117.3
Inferno9543%0.9916.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.6%Headshot accuracy
38.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.9%Spray accuracy
81.7%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
498msReaction time
32.3%T opening success
50.3%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
9.5%Flash assists
9.97HE damage / grenade
7.04Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.2647% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno8–130.0323%27 Aug
mirage13–30.0120%27 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0224%27 Aug
mirage13–110.0426%25 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0222%24 Aug
mirage13–60.0823%23 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0811%22 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0327%22 Aug
dust213–8-0.0424%21 Aug
mirage13–110.0621%20 Aug
inferno12–160.0120%19 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0320%18 Aug
dust213–70.0216%16 Aug
cache13–70.0121%16 Aug
inferno13–70.0522%15 Aug
cache13–3-0.054%14 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0420%12 Aug
nuke5–130.0418%11 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0218%8 Aug
cache13–110.0616%7 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0114%7 Aug
nuke7–130.0317%6 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0126%4 Aug
dust214–16-0.0321%3 Aug
vertigo13–80.0628%2 Aug
mirage13–70.0641%31 Jul
mirage16–120.0121%27 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0014%26 Jul
cache6–13-0.0621%25 Jul
dust26–130.0219%15 Jul
mirage13–100.0321%15 Jul
ancient7–130.0039%13 Jul
mirage13–30.0623%10 Jul
dust213–20.0730%10 Jul
cache10–130.0420%10 Jul
dust21–13-0.0721%9 Jul
mirage10–130.0120%9 Jul
mirage13–80.1139%9 Jul
anubis8–130.0530%9 Jul
cache14–160.0126%6 Jul
mirage13–110.0326%4 Jul
anubis16–19-0.049%4 Jul
anubis10–130.0923%30 Jun
dust213–8-0.0227%29 Jun
anubis16–120.0313%27 Jun
anubis17–19-0.0118%26 Jun
nuke13–50.0419%25 Jun
mirage13–80.0014%24 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0218%22 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0411%21 Jun
mirage13–80.0119%19 Jun
mirage13–110.0430%18 Jun
ancient16–190.0224%18 Jun
anubis13–70.0218%14 Jun
mirage13–40.0020%13 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0429%13 Jun
cache14–160.0128%12 Jun
mirage16–14-0.0820%11 Jun
overpass11–13-0.0512%11 Jun
nuke14–16-0.0625%11 Jun
mirage16–140.0721%10 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0235%9 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0519%9 Jun
mirage13–100.0017%9 Jun
overpass13–40.0939%9 Jun
mirage13–50.0927%9 Jun
dust213–100.0717%7 Jun
mirage9–130.0134%6 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0733%6 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0133%5 Jun
mirage13–20.1025%5 Jun
dust213–50.0843%5 Jun
ancient13–50.1019%5 Jun
ancient13–10.1536%5 Jun
mirage11–130.0416%3 Jun
dust211–13-0.0224%3 Jun
mirage13–60.0720%3 Jun
dust213–70.0033%2 Jun
mirage13–90.1022%1 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0115%31 May
mirage13–10.0622%31 May
dust213–2-0.0124%31 May
anubis4–13-0.0439%28 May
cache13–5-0.0118%24 May
cache6–130.1132%19 May
nuke5–13-0.0132%9 May
nuke16–140.0219%9 May
mirage16–140.0124%2 May
mirage13–8-0.0225%25 Apr
ancient7–130.0023%19 Apr
dust213–8-0.0131%15 Apr
overpass13–10-0.0238%12 Mar
mirage13–40.0718%12 Mar
nuke15–15-0.0122%5 Feb
anubis13–50.0015%5 Feb
overpass7–130.0131%31 Jan
overpass13–110.0219%28 Jan
dust213–50.0628%27 Jan
dust213–80.0526%23 Jan
office10–13-0.0822%23 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →