MikiPl

MikiPl — CS2 Stats

PL76561198262478137[U:1:302212409]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,003Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 5 · 897 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,003 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 62 days played since 30 Oct 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,182 +785 30 Oct3 Jul · 31 days played
15,86319,466peak 19,46630 Oct3 Jul
19,466Peak Premier in tracked matches
897Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
62Days played since 2025-10-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 897
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 4 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-17
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-17

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMikiPlFACEITLevel 5 · 897 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPEAK ELO897csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning54
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47503Last 10047%Win rateWLLWWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.1pp headshot accuracy · +26ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 639ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 635ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 622ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility3.8
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch3.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 608ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.4
Utility3.8
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time619ms−50ms
first ⅓ avg 669ms → last ⅓ avg 619ms
Headshot accuracy18.0%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 16.6% → last ⅓ avg 18.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 13–5 · mirage, 14 Dec
50%Best headshot accuracy · 0–9 · inferno, 7 Mar
406msFastest reaction time · 1–9 · inferno, 7 Mar
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 29 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
96In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 80% over 5cacheWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC23101343%-0.02
mirageA2112957%0.03
cacheD103730%0.01
anubisB105550%-0.00
dust2D103730%-0.01
nukeA95456%-0.01
overpassS64267%0.00
ancientS54180%0.01
rooftop2020%-0.05
poseidon1010%-0.21
train110100%0.11
italy1010%-0.04
office1010%-0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

425Matches
48%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
79.5ADR
35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8845%1.0016.0
Anubis6647%1.0015.4
Inferno4844%1.1416.7
Dust24641%1.0315.5
Ancient1958%0.8614.1
Nuke1443%0.8113.7
Overpass1464%1.1216.1
Cache1050%1.2018.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.0%Headshot accuracy
37.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
75.1%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
608msReaction time
37.6%T opening success
47.7%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
4.0%Flash assists
9.13HE damage / grenade
4.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.5647% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–10-0.0518%30 Aug
cache11–130.0520%30 Aug
cache10–130.0220%26 Aug
cache13–40.1028%29 Jul
inferno13–100.1123%29 Jul
mirage13–10.0618%29 Jul
cache4–13-0.0815%22 Jul
mirage7–13-0.044%13 Jul
cache7–130.0219%8 Jul
anubis8–13-0.058%7 Jul
inferno16–130.0112%3 Jul
anubis13–16-0.0324%3 Jul
dust210–130.0118%2 Jul
inferno13–110.0512%1 Jul
cache12–120.0013%23 Jun
dust26–13-0.0633%16 Jun
cache13–11-0.0612%16 Jun
mirage13–110.1213%15 Jun
mirage13–90.014%12 Jun
cache13–30.0119%10 Jun
inferno13–80.0312%9 Jun
anubis11–130.0416%7 Jun
cache11–130.0222%4 Jun
poseidon1–9-0.2136%1 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0121%14 May
cache8–13-0.0130%12 May
inferno6–13-0.0519%5 May
dust28–13-0.0117%5 May
inferno7–90.0028%28 Apr
dust25–130.0313%28 Apr
anubis13–9-0.0019%28 Apr
nuke9–5-0.0414%26 Apr
anubis13–60.0314%9 Apr
inferno6–13-0.034%1 Apr
anubis6–13-0.094%31 Mar
nuke9–50.0416%31 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0316%27 Mar
ancient7–13-0.0221%24 Mar
mirage6–130.0117%24 Mar
mirage13–50.1316%23 Mar
nuke5–13-0.0915%17 Mar
inferno13–60.0123%17 Mar
anubis13–60.0915%13 Mar
dust26–13-0.059%12 Mar
inferno13–8-0.0124%11 Mar
inferno1–9-0.1738%7 Mar
inferno0–9-0.2150%7 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0338%1 Mar
nuke10–13-0.047%1 Mar
overpass13–70.0223%11 Feb
dust29–130.0210%10 Feb
ancient13–70.0312%2 Feb
inferno16–140.0311%2 Feb
anubis13–110.0210%2 Feb
mirage6–13-0.048%28 Jan
nuke13–70.0412%26 Jan
anubis13–1-0.0211%26 Jan
nuke9–130.0013%25 Jan
mirage13–9-0.0220%25 Jan
mirage13–100.0521%17 Jan
mirage8–130.0223%13 Jan
inferno9–4-0.0217%11 Jan
inferno19–170.0126%10 Jan
nuke13–10-0.0120%10 Jan
train13–80.113%10 Jan
ancient13–11-0.0018%6 Jan
dust24–13-0.0122%6 Jan
mirage11–130.069%4 Jan
inferno10–13-0.0521%4 Jan
dust213–4-0.0617%4 Jan
nuke7–13-0.027%3 Jan
inferno4–13-0.1113%3 Jan
overpass13–100.1123%2 Jan
mirage13–50.0814%2 Jan
inferno5–13-0.0115%29 Dec
mirage5–13-0.0125%29 Dec
overpass6–13-0.0116%14 Dec
inferno13–50.0411%14 Dec
mirage13–50.1818%14 Dec
nuke13–110.0618%14 Dec
ancient13–6-0.0027%12 Dec
inferno13–16-0.0125%12 Dec
overpass13–8-0.0413%26 Nov
mirage16–120.0219%26 Nov
mirage15–150.0414%23 Nov
italy5–13-0.0422%22 Nov
office3–13-0.1127%22 Nov
overpass13–10-0.0410%22 Nov
inferno13–16-0.0420%22 Nov
overpass15–15-0.0218%18 Nov
inferno4–13-0.0111%18 Nov
dust213–8-0.0620%17 Nov
ancient13–30.0313%16 Nov
mirage10–130.0415%16 Nov
anubis8–13-0.0212%12 Nov
mirage16–120.0423%12 Nov
dust213–50.0910%12 Nov
rooftop3–9-0.110%12 Nov
rooftop5–90.0117%31 Oct
mirage11–130.0126%30 Oct

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →