xdddddddddd

xdddddddddd — CS2 Stats

EE76561198260315230[U:1:300049502]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

672Tracked matches33%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,842Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating27,935Top 5% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3234 of 261507 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,282 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Nov 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,935 +310 9 Sept – 8 Nov · 33 days played
26,76828,889peak 28,8899 Sept8 Nov
28,889Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,478Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-09-09

Faceit ELO

  • 196 below peak (1,478)
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 69 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-17
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-17

Premier CS Rating

  • 954 below peak (28,889)
  • +34 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 2,065 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-17
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-17

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is recorded after matches CSDB sees, so those points are days actually played — but only from the day tracking started: no feed exposes the ELO a past match ended on, so nothing before it can be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches7——
Win rate57%——
K/D0.95——
Headshot %33%——

Measured 5 Nov 2026 → 14 Nov 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate37.9%44.8%45.7%7.8% short
Shot accuracy15.7%12.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.271.031.05above
Match win rate49.5%45.2%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGxddddddddddFACEITLevel 6 · 1,282 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER27,935 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,478csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning59
Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD33–63–4Last 10033%Win rateTWLWLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −1.7pp headshot accuracy · −33ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 505ms

Last 10

  • 3–6–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Last 20

  • 7–11–2 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 526ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility6.9
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch4.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.9
Utility6.9
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact0.0

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time505ms−28ms
first ⅓ avg 533ms → last ⅓ avg 505ms
Headshot accuracy15.6%−2.9%
first ⅓ avg 18.5% → last ⅓ avg 15.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 9–4 · nuke, 30 Sept →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · mirage, 14 Sept →
344msFastest reaction time · 0–6 · inferno, 1 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 10 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
6–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
20Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 73% over 11anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC3412–2235%-0.00
dust2D194–1521%-0.01
infernoD154–1127%0.02
nukeS118–373%0.04
ancientD103–730%-0.00
anubisD61–517%0.00
cacheD51–420%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

141,150Lifetime kills
1.27K/D · Top 25% of Level 6 players
6,382Matches
49.5%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 6 players
37.9%Headshot %
15.7%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 6 players
19,769MVPs
2,842Hours (in match)
10,569Bombs planted
1,928Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4749,067
AWP10,202
SG 5532,990
P2502,907
MP92,693
P902,543

Lifetime map wins

12,335dust2
2,541nuke
1,949inferno
863train
414vertigo
276cbble
105lake
93office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

74Matches
53%Win rate
1.37Avg K/D
86.0ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2752%1.2417.0
Dust22055%1.3516.9
Ancient1060%1.4518.2
Nuke1040%1.3216.2
Cache367%1.5812.7
Inferno20%1.0714.5
Anubis2100%3.3217.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.3%Headshot accuracy
37.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.1%Spray accuracy
80.3%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
517msReaction time
25.3%T opening success
54.0%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
9.9%Flash assists
9.38HE damage / grenade
14.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.2829% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage15–150.0012%8 Nov →
mirage13–5-0.087%8 Nov →
inferno7–13-0.068%8 Nov →
ancient13–50.0319%2 Nov →
cache9–13-0.0712%2 Nov →
cache9–130.0113%2 Nov →
inferno13–100.0614%2 Nov →
dust23–13-0.1017%26 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0126%26 Oct →
nuke14–16-0.0214%26 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0119%26 Oct →
mirage14–16-0.0314%25 Oct →
dust213–16-0.0113%25 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.075%21 Oct →
mirage0–13-0.0517%21 Oct →
mirage15–15-0.0226%19 Oct →
nuke13–110.0412%19 Oct →
mirage13–90.0419%19 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0120%18 Oct →
mirage13–50.0514%18 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0619%17 Oct →
nuke13–50.1122%17 Oct →
dust216–130.0416%14 Oct →
inferno8–130.0111%14 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0221%13 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.047%13 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0217%13 Oct →
mirage0–13-0.0522%13 Oct →
inferno4–130.009%13 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0115%12 Oct →
inferno4–130.0227%12 Oct →
mirage15–150.0212%12 Oct →
nuke13–90.0517%12 Oct →
mirage11–130.0510%11 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.068%11 Oct →
dust23–13-0.093%11 Oct →
mirage11–130.029%11 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.109%10 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0016%10 Oct →
ancient13–10.0123%10 Oct →
dust27–130.0014%5 Oct →
dust21–13-0.0731%2 Oct →
mirage13–60.0213%2 Oct →
cache13–110.0110%2 Oct →
mirage13–110.0111%1 Oct →
inferno3–130.0412%1 Oct →
inferno0–60.0832%1 Oct →
inferno9–50.077%30 Sept →
nuke9–40.1818%30 Sept →
nuke16–140.0813%30 Sept →
ancient5–130.0516%29 Sept →
dust211–130.0620%29 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0211%28 Sept →
anubis3–130.0117%28 Sept →
ancient12–160.0214%28 Sept →
inferno7–00.1225%28 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0216%28 Sept →
inferno5–130.0223%28 Sept →
mirage13–70.0016%27 Sept →
cache7–130.0013%27 Sept →
mirage13–60.0815%27 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0611%27 Sept →
cache12–160.0019%27 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0019%27 Sept →
dust29–130.0524%27 Sept →
mirage16–130.069%27 Sept →
inferno13–60.0211%27 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0420%26 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0115%26 Sept →
inferno13–16-0.0317%26 Sept →
dust213–60.0717%26 Sept →
anubis13–160.0111%26 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.058%26 Sept →
anubis12–16-0.0514%25 Sept →
mirage12–16-0.0317%21 Sept →
mirage8–130.0314%21 Sept →
mirage0–13-0.0620%21 Sept →
nuke16–13-0.0115%21 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0324%20 Sept →
mirage13–16-0.0119%20 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0314%20 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0422%16 Sept →
dust213–20.0215%16 Sept →
mirage13–90.0112%16 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0124%14 Sept →
mirage0–13-0.07100%14 Sept →
nuke16–130.0313%14 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0121%14 Sept →
mirage11–130.077%13 Sept →
anubis13–80.0711%13 Sept →
ancient13–80.0210%13 Sept →
ancient14–160.0214%13 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0714%13 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0314%12 Sept →
dust29–130.0629%12 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0113%11 Sept →
nuke13–50.0511%11 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0327%11 Sept →
inferno9–130.0114%11 Sept →
mirage13–100.0615%9 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.