don spaghetti

don spaghetti — CS2 Stats

IE76561198260286893[U:1:300021165]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,598Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating24,926Top 25% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#20984 of 220544 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,598 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 33 days played since 19 Oct 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,926 +1,403 30 May10 Sept · 8 days played
23,52324,926peak 24,92630 May10 Sept
24,963Peak Premier in tracked matches
33Days played since 2025-10-19

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 24,926
  • +548 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 74 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-07
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-07

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGdon spaghettiFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER24,926 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning47
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49465Last 10049%Win rateWWLTWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · −4.8pp headshot accuracy · +48ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 311 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 20

  • 1271 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 557ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility6.2
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels1.0
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 15% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning4.7
Utility6.2
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time559ms−61ms
first ⅓ avg 621ms → last ⅓ avg 559ms
Headshot accuracy16.6%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–10 · mirage, 24 May
67%Best headshot accuracy · 5–2 · ancient, 28 Aug
438msFastest reaction time · 5–2 · ancient, 28 Aug
13–2Biggest win · dust2, 18 Dec

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
54In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 63% over 8nukeWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA29171259%0.01
cacheC1771041%-0.00
dust2A148657%0.01
infernoB137654%-0.00
ancientA85363%0.01
nukeD72529%0.00
overpass3030%-0.02
debris2020%-0.06
vertigo21150%0.06
poseidon21150%0.03
anubis1010%0.05
fachwerk1010%-0.01
eldorado110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

896Matches
53%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
75.3ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3177%1.3116.1
Dust21573%1.0215.6
Ancient1354%0.8312.2
Inferno1164%1.1114.2
Train967%0.9413.6
Nuke888%1.4915.0
Anubis633%0.8814.5
Vertigo540%0.719.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.4%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.2%Spray accuracy
79.5%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
571msReaction time
14.7%T opening success
40.0%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
14.78HE damage / grenade
13.96Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 14.745% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–80.0113%7 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0216%5 Sept
cache10–13-0.0218%5 Sept
overpass8–8-0.1014%5 Sept
mirage13–100.0324%5 Sept
debris7–9-0.0918%5 Sept
nuke6–13-0.028%4 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0316%4 Sept
ancient1–13-0.0039%4 Sept
dust213–8-0.0310%2 Sept
cache13–8-0.0216%2 Sept
vertigo9–60.0122%2 Sept
mirage13–100.039%2 Sept
mirage10–130.0514%1 Sept
dust213–90.0325%1 Sept
cache13–16-0.0513%1 Sept
inferno13–4-0.0011%1 Sept
nuke13–30.0921%1 Sept
dust28–13-0.0027%28 Aug
ancient5–20.0767%28 Aug
mirage13–5-0.017%28 Aug
dust213–90.0311%28 Aug
mirage3–0-0.030%28 Aug
inferno7–130.007%28 Aug
cache13–30.109%28 Aug
mirage3–13-0.057%27 Aug
cache16–14-0.0214%27 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0711%29 Jul
anubis10–130.0518%26 Jul
debris8–8-0.0312%26 Jul
overpass9–130.0412%26 Jul
mirage11–130.0414%26 Jul
dust28–13-0.0325%26 Jul
dust29–13-0.0330%20 Jul
cache10–3-0.0323%20 Jul
ancient13–80.059%20 Jul
poseidon9–10.0521%20 Jul
cache5–13-0.0510%20 Jul
fachwerk11–13-0.0117%20 Jul
poseidon6–90.0131%20 Jul
eldorado9–7-0.0216%20 Jul
mirage13–40.0310%7 Jun
dust28–130.0216%7 Jun
mirage1–13-0.114%7 Jun
cache12–12-0.026%3 Jun
vertigo10–130.1016%3 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0416%3 Jun
inferno7–130.0219%2 Jun
dust213–60.0031%2 Jun
cache5–130.0531%2 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0219%1 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0910%1 Jun
ancient13–110.0720%31 May
cache9–130.0324%31 May
ancient13–60.017%30 May
dust27–130.0113%29 May
nuke13–4-0.0213%29 May
ancient13–50.0021%29 May
cache13–100.0620%27 May
inferno13–100.0212%27 May
inferno12–120.0211%26 May
mirage11–2-0.0032%26 May
nuke9–13-0.0112%25 May
mirage13–40.0612%24 May
cache10–130.0112%24 May
mirage13–100.1321%24 May
mirage2–110.0613%23 May
inferno13–7-0.047%23 May
mirage13–70.0617%23 May
mirage13–40.0616%23 May
mirage10–13-0.025%22 May
mirage12–120.0014%22 May
cache13–110.0411%18 May
cache4–13-0.0520%18 May
cache2–12-0.140%18 May
mirage13–70.0017%18 May
mirage1–13-0.0514%18 May
inferno13–50.0414%3 May
mirage5–130.0323%3 May
dust213–100.0515%3 May
cache3–130.0125%3 May
inferno9–13-0.0215%21 Mar
dust213–9-0.0510%21 Mar
mirage13–80.0521%21 Mar
nuke9–130.0013%21 Mar
mirage2–130.0017%20 Mar
dust213–50.0216%20 Mar
overpass2–13-0.0118%20 Mar
inferno13–4-0.0311%10 Mar
mirage13–70.0119%10 Mar
mirage13–40.0631%21 Dec
dust28–130.0321%18 Dec
dust213–20.0419%18 Dec
nuke13–16-0.0514%2 Nov
ancient5–13-0.0511%2 Nov
inferno13–30.0124%2 Nov
mirage8–13-0.0115%2 Nov
inferno8–130.0525%22 Oct
nuke11–130.0135%22 Oct
inferno5–13-0.0510%19 Oct

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →