aKKi

aKKi — CS2 Stats

76561198258655143[U:1:298389415]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,350Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating21,158Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#61583 of 232419 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,151 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+69Premier CS Rating · 21,089 → 21,158
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 32 days played since 29 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,158 -3,039 29 Jul20 Sept · 33 days played
20,65524,394peak 24,39429 Jul20 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,151 +0 1 Sept16 Sept · 3 observations
1,1511,151peak 1,1511 Sept16 Sept
24,538Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,151Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-07-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,151
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 50 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,236 below peak (24,394)
  • -314 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,842 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGaKKiFACEITLevel 5 · 1,151 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER21,158 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,151csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68
Positioning50
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48493Last 10048%Win rateWLWWTLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating · +5.9pp headshot accuracy · +65ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 311 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 714ms

Last 10

  • 631 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 688ms

Last 20

  • 992 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 655ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim6.8
Utility5.3
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 666ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8
Positioning5.0
Utility5.3
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time655ms−2ms
first ⅓ avg 657ms → last ⅓ avg 655ms
Headshot accuracy21.0%−3.4%
first ⅓ avg 24.4% → last ⅓ avg 21.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 11–13 · anubis, 1 Sept
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · dust2, 3 Aug
469msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · dust2, 19 Sept
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 14 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
98In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 9anubisWeakest map · 27% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C26101638%-0.00
mirageA2213959%-0.01
anubisD1541127%0.01
ancientB137654%-0.02
infernoS96367%-0.02
cacheS96367%-0.03
nukeD62433%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

202Matches
51%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
76.3ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3040%0.8614.1
Anubis2365%1.3117.7
Inferno2143%0.9613.7
Ancient2055%1.0716.3
Dust21650%1.0416.5
Vertigo650%1.1016.5
Overpass560%1.1817.4
Nuke333%0.7412.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.2%Headshot accuracy
36.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.6%Spray accuracy
78.7%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
666msReaction time
39.0%T opening success
28.5%CT opening success
0.57Enemies flashed / flash
11.8%Flash assists
7.76HE damage / grenade
5.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.9856% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–50.0834%20 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0119%20 Sept
mirage13–90.0221%20 Sept
inferno13–20.0225%19 Sept
anubis15–150.0215%19 Sept
dust25–13-0.0120%19 Sept
inferno16–140.0220%16 Sept
nuke3–13-0.0233%16 Sept
dust213–110.0627%16 Sept
mirage13–110.0219%16 Sept
anubis9–13-0.0420%16 Sept
dust212–16-0.0216%15 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0225%15 Sept
anubis15–15-0.0128%14 Sept
ancient13–1-0.070%14 Sept
cache0–3-0.040%14 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0837%14 Sept
ancient13–80.029%14 Sept
nuke7–13-0.0224%12 Sept
nuke13–9-0.0615%12 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0416%12 Sept
cache13–9-0.0819%12 Sept
ancient0–13-0.060%12 Sept
ancient10–130.0318%9 Sept
anubis13–20.0225%9 Sept
cache13–110.0030%9 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0319%9 Sept
mirage10–130.0026%9 Sept
mirage11–13-0.0424%8 Sept
cache13–10-0.0220%8 Sept
dust213–11-0.0227%8 Sept
mirage13–70.0039%8 Sept
inferno13–9-0.0624%7 Sept
dust216–140.0019%7 Sept
mirage13–50.0217%7 Sept
mirage13–90.0322%3 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0117%3 Sept
mirage8–130.0024%2 Sept
dust213–100.0111%2 Sept
anubis11–130.1024%1 Sept
dust211–13-0.0414%1 Sept
nuke10–13-0.0330%21 Aug
dust29–13-0.0336%20 Aug
anubis9–130.0330%20 Aug
dust210–130.0021%19 Aug
anubis9–130.0217%19 Aug
mirage13–90.0212%17 Aug
mirage13–7-0.058%17 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0120%17 Aug
dust213–9-0.0232%15 Aug
dust215–150.0323%14 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0811%14 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0624%12 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0422%12 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0524%10 Aug
cache13–90.0225%10 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0519%10 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0518%9 Aug
dust214–160.0119%9 Aug
mirage8–130.0119%9 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0318%8 Aug
dust29–13-0.0511%8 Aug
dust213–10.0022%8 Aug
dust210–13-0.0320%8 Aug
mirage16–130.0122%8 Aug
dust25–13-0.0317%7 Aug
dust210–13-0.0115%7 Aug
ancient13–50.0432%7 Aug
anubis13–10.0621%7 Aug
dust216–13-0.0423%6 Aug
inferno16–12-0.0135%5 Aug
mirage13–90.0031%5 Aug
dust21–50.0775%5 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0219%4 Aug
anubis0–13-0.080%4 Aug
dust213–70.0922%4 Aug
mirage9–1-0.0312%4 Aug
dust213–80.0238%4 Aug
mirage4–130.0126%3 Aug
dust20–13-0.01100%3 Aug
anubis0–13-0.030%3 Aug
inferno11–130.0122%2 Aug
dust213–50.0118%2 Aug
cache13–11-0.0222%2 Aug
dust211–13-0.0414%2 Aug
dust27–13-0.0020%2 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0623%1 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0418%1 Aug
dust210–13-0.0426%1 Aug
ancient13–90.0425%1 Aug
anubis7–130.0222%1 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0012%1 Aug
cache10–13-0.0711%31 Jul
inferno13–60.0237%31 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0312%31 Jul
cache13–30.0023%30 Jul
anubis13–80.0318%30 Jul
inferno4–13-0.1121%30 Jul
anubis2–13-0.0115%29 Jul
cache5–13-0.0816%29 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →