TB4U | KAZAX ☛☚

TB4U | KAZAX ☛☚ — CS2 Stats

76561198258227688[U:1:297961960]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,127Tracked matches59%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating13,771Blue band · top ~34.9% of ranked players (population est.)
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 38 days played since 20 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,771 -1,228 20 May16 Sept · 27 days played
10,72816,948peak 16,94820 May16 Sept
17,167Peak Premier in tracked matches
38Days played since 2026-05-20

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,177 below peak (16,948)
  • +801 over 30 days · improving
  • -2,549 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 1,229 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-10
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTB4U | KAZAX ☛☚PREMIER13,771 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning58
Utility62

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48475Last 10048%Win rateLWWLWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.8pp headshot accuracy · −52ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Last 20

  • 1271 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 574ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility6.2
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch4.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 571ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning5.8
Utility6.2
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time579ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 608ms → last ⅓ avg 579ms
Headshot accuracy13.6%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 13.5% → last ⅓ avg 13.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 9–4 · inferno, 31 May
29%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · dust2, 31 Jul
422msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · ancient, 13 Sept
13–0Biggest win · inferno, 3 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
87In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 15dust2Weakest map · 19% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA22121055%0.01
ancientA1811761%0.01
dust2D1631319%-0.02
mirageC167944%-0.01
nukeS1510567%0.02
anubisC83538%-0.02
cacheC52340%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (19% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

568Matches
50%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
85.9ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient12049%0.9015.5
Inferno11750%1.1516.2
Mirage9446%0.9314.6
Nuke8865%1.1916.3
Dust26647%0.9514.5
Anubis6447%0.9015.2
Train838%0.7914.3
Vertigo650%0.9017.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

13.4%Headshot accuracy
39.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.4%Spray accuracy
86.5%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
571msReaction time
40.3%T opening success
53.1%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
14.22HE damage / grenade
4.97Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 13.3708% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

19% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust210–130.0214%16 Sept
ancient13–100.0112%16 Sept
ancient13–70.0215%16 Sept
dust29–13-0.0612%13 Sept
ancient13–11-0.069%13 Sept
dust25–13-0.0629%13 Sept
mirage9–130.0413%13 Sept
inferno16–120.0415%12 Sept
nuke13–60.0419%12 Sept
dust22–13-0.0417%12 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0814%12 Sept
cache13–1-0.0416%7 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0414%7 Sept
mirage13–7-0.0012%7 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0016%6 Sept
ancient15–150.0412%6 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0419%6 Sept
nuke13–40.0321%6 Sept
nuke13–4-0.0010%6 Sept
mirage16–12-0.0114%6 Sept
nuke11–2-0.0612%5 Sept
inferno5–13-0.064%5 Sept
ancient13–60.0211%5 Sept
nuke13–50.0613%5 Sept
nuke6–13-0.086%4 Sept
mirage4–130.0213%4 Sept
inferno13–70.037%4 Sept
nuke11–13-0.0311%4 Sept
inferno11–13-0.0210%1 Sept
mirage13–50.0619%31 Aug
nuke10–130.0615%29 Aug
anubis10–13-0.019%29 Aug
dust29–13-0.0119%29 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0717%29 Aug
cache15–15-0.038%25 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0120%25 Aug
dust25–13-0.0824%17 Aug
mirage8–130.0412%16 Aug
inferno9–13-0.037%16 Aug
nuke13–110.0615%16 Aug
dust26–130.0319%16 Aug
cache7–130.0412%16 Aug
ancient13–30.026%16 Aug
ancient13–4-0.046%11 Aug
dust22–13-0.0216%11 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0122%11 Aug
ancient13–110.0313%10 Aug
inferno15–150.0123%9 Aug
inferno11–13-0.058%3 Aug
inferno13–00.0712%3 Aug
cache13–10-0.0311%3 Aug
cache10–13-0.0216%3 Aug
dust210–130.0329%31 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0811%31 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0520%31 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0319%28 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0211%28 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0113%28 Jul
dust213–60.0119%26 Jul
anubis9–13-0.074%26 Jul
mirage7–130.016%24 Jul
inferno13–90.0311%24 Jul
ancient13–6-0.018%24 Jul
nuke11–10.1118%22 Jul
nuke13–50.066%22 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0320%20 Jul
ancient7–130.0220%20 Jul
dust29–130.0411%20 Jul
ancient8–130.0113%19 Jul
dust24–13-0.0617%18 Jul
dust213–30.058%18 Jul
ancient12–16-0.079%18 Jul
dust213–10-0.0717%18 Jul
mirage13–9-0.148%18 Jul
dust25–13-0.0311%18 Jul
dust25–13-0.107%18 Jul
inferno13–160.0216%9 Jul
nuke13–30.0613%9 Jul
inferno13–60.0011%4 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0113%4 Jul
nuke11–130.0123%29 Jun
inferno13–110.0118%29 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0013%26 Jun
ancient5–130.0015%26 Jun
ancient13–50.1021%26 Jun
anubis11–130.0110%22 Jun
ancient13–11-0.038%22 Jun
anubis16–130.0416%18 Jun
ancient13–60.015%15 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0112%15 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0319%8 Jun
nuke13–110.0015%8 Jun
mirage16–120.0113%7 Jun
mirage13–90.0117%3 Jun
inferno9–40.1713%31 May
inferno9–60.0815%31 May
inferno13–20.0817%26 May
ancient15–150.0711%26 May
mirage13–30.0523%26 May
anubis13–80.029%20 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →