mexyou

mexyou — CS2 Stats

76561198255935874[U:1:295670146]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

797Tracked matches72%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.9 StrongPositional Player
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. Today is the first observation — history builds from here and cannot be backfilled. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Performance scores

Aim97
Positioning69
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY61336Last 10061%Win rateWWWWWLWTWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −0.2pp headshot accuracy · −2ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 50 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.08
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 437ms

Last 10

  • 721 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.08
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 436ms

Last 20

  • 1631 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 437ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim9.7
Utility5.8
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels4.5

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 97 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

T openings. 62% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 62% on T to 41% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.7
Positioning6.9
Utility5.8
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels5.5
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.9/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.07+0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.07
Reaction time439ms−51ms
first ⅓ avg 490ms → last ⅓ avg 439ms
Headshot accuracy19.1%−1.6%
first ⅓ avg 20.7% → last ⅓ avg 19.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.31Best match rating · 4–6 · nuke, 12 Sept
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · nuke, 23 Aug
344msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · anubis, 17 Sept
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 11 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W5Current streak
45In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 78% over 18dust2Weakest map · 43% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2013765%0.01
nukeS1814478%0.08
cacheA159660%0.05
dust2C146843%0.04
anubisS107370%0.07
vertigoS96367%0.05
infernoB63350%0.03
ancient3030%-0.04
italy21150%0.04
train110100%0.07
office1010%0.03
poseidon110100%0.17

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.4%Headshot accuracy
45.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
46.7%Spray accuracy
86.0%Counter-strafing
7.8°Preaim
438msReaction time
62.5%T opening success
41.4%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
7.3%Flash assists
8.35HE damage / grenade
9.21Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–60.0815%19 Sept
vertigo13–70.0825%19 Sept
mirage13–7-0.0014%19 Sept
cache13–30.1414%19 Sept
dust213–90.0926%19 Sept
mirage7–130.0216%18 Sept
vertigo13–70.1821%18 Sept
anubis12–120.1522%18 Sept
cache13–20.1515%18 Sept
italy8–13-0.0526%17 Sept
anubis13–70.0814%17 Sept
dust213–50.0321%17 Sept
vertigo13–100.0123%17 Sept
mirage13–30.0617%17 Sept
dust213–70.0314%15 Sept
cache13–50.0013%15 Sept
inferno9–130.0229%15 Sept
train13–20.0715%15 Sept
nuke13–30.0731%14 Sept
cache13–30.1420%14 Sept
inferno13–40.0315%14 Sept
dust213–90.0216%14 Sept
mirage13–11-0.0012%14 Sept
vertigo8–130.0320%14 Sept
nuke13–20.1031%14 Sept
nuke4–60.3133%12 Sept
mirage2–130.0312%12 Sept
mirage10–130.0423%11 Sept
cache8–13-0.0015%11 Sept
nuke13–00.2617%11 Sept
cache13–9-0.0210%10 Sept
dust210–13-0.0214%10 Sept
nuke13–40.2120%10 Sept
inferno10–130.0819%10 Sept
anubis13–60.1127%10 Sept
mirage13–7-0.0131%10 Sept
nuke13–40.0344%9 Sept
nuke13–50.0823%9 Sept
inferno13–100.0329%9 Sept
mirage13–80.0616%9 Sept
cache11–13-0.0717%7 Sept
cache5–00.0830%7 Sept
vertigo7–13-0.0612%7 Sept
nuke13–20.1924%7 Sept
mirage13–40.0623%7 Sept
dust211–130.0019%7 Sept
office6–130.0310%5 Sept
mirage2–13-0.0221%5 Sept
nuke13–10.0523%3 Sept
vertigo13–80.0211%3 Sept
cache13–40.1613%3 Sept
mirage12–120.0327%3 Sept
poseidon9–50.1719%3 Sept
nuke6–90.0410%3 Sept
anubis13–11-0.0116%25 Aug
dust213–20.1225%25 Aug
nuke0–13-0.11100%23 Aug
inferno13–100.0314%23 Aug
dust26–13-0.0426%22 Aug
cache12–120.0811%22 Aug
nuke13–60.0219%22 Aug
mirage13–9-0.058%20 Aug
nuke13–110.0428%20 Aug
cache10–130.0517%20 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0113%18 Aug
dust212–120.0621%18 Aug
cache13–40.1013%18 Aug
vertigo13–20.1325%18 Aug
nuke13–5-0.0312%18 Aug
mirage13–60.0728%18 Aug
italy13–70.1432%18 Aug
nuke13–70.0319%18 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0522%18 Aug
nuke8–130.0220%16 Aug
mirage8–20.0210%16 Aug
dust213–40.1620%16 Aug
nuke13–90.0720%16 Aug
dust29–130.0522%16 Aug
anubis12–120.0813%16 Aug
dust28–130.0213%13 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0916%11 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0220%11 Aug
vertigo10–13-0.0118%11 Aug
mirage13–90.0327%11 Aug
cache13–50.0827%11 Aug
dust24–130.0519%9 Aug
ancient8–130.0011%9 Aug
anubis12–120.0524%9 Aug
nuke13–80.0920%9 Aug
mirage11–130.0317%9 Aug
cache8–13-0.0614%6 Aug
dust211–130.0322%6 Aug
anubis13–20.1220%6 Aug
mirage13–110.0014%6 Aug
cache10–13-0.0123%6 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0722%6 Aug
mirage13–70.0017%5 Aug
anubis9–00.0456%5 Aug
vertigo13–30.0325%5 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0216%5 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →