Blizxard — CS2 Stats

76561198255530436[U:1:295264708]

982Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.9 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating19,034Purple band · top ~12.3% of ranked players (population est.)

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77

Positioning55

Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY40–57–3Last 10040%Win rateLWWWLWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.7

Aggression8.7

Utility3.9

Positioning5.5

Opening Duels4.0

Clutch5.2

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 560ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7

Positioning5.5

Utility3.9

Mechanics7.0

Opening Duels4.0

Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time564ms−63ms

first ⅓ avg 627ms → last ⅓ avg 564ms

Headshot accuracy17.8%−1.0%

first ⅓ avg 18.9% → last ⅓ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.11Best rating — dust2 6–13

13–0Biggest win — inferno

4Longest win streak

4–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 57% over 7mirageWeakest map · 22% over 18

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	22	10–12	45%	-0.01
inferno	C	21	9–12	43%	-0.01
mirage	D	18	4–14	22%	-0.03
cache	C	18	8–10	44%	-0.00
anubis	B	10	5–5	50%	-0.01
ancient	A	7	4–3	57%	-0.01
nuke	—	4	0–4	0%	-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

195Matches

50%Win rate

1.07Avg K/D

80.0ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win

19%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	40	55%	1.10	15.5
Dust2	36	53%	1.08	15.6
Inferno	28	39%	0.89	14.4
Anubis	17	53%	1.12	17.6
Ancient	10	50%	1.05	14.9
Cache	10	50%	1.16	15.9
Nuke	8	25%	0.86	12.6
Overpass	6	100%	1.42	18.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy

36.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.7%Spray accuracy

81.3%Counter-strafing

8.7°Preaim

560msReaction time

38.0%T opening success

53.6%CT opening success

0.52Enemies flashed / flash

6.5%Flash assists

8.58HE damage / grenade

3.46Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 3.4625 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 38.0402% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	11–13	-0.03	21%	28 Aug →
inferno	13–7	-0.01	18%	28 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.05	19%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	13%	28 Aug →
inferno	12–16	0.01	25%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	21%	27 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.02	17%	26 Aug →
cache	2–13	0.06	6%	19 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	13%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.08	19%	18 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.02	14%	18 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.02	21%	18 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.00	32%	16 Aug →
ancient	14–16	-0.00	14%	15 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.01	11%	15 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.03	31%	15 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	13%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–0	0.05	29%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.02	23%	13 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.04	21%	13 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.08	13%	12 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.08	17%	9 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.08	12%	9 Aug →
mirage	12–12	0.00	13%	8 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.05	17%	6 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.02	15%	5 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.06	9%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.03	11%	26 Jul →
inferno	12–12	-0.00	20%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.05	29%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–8	-0.05	14%	26 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.06	14%	26 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.01	24%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–6	-0.01	28%	25 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.11	25%	24 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.02	15%	24 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.01	14%	24 Jul →
anubis	14–16	-0.01	9%	23 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.06	19%	23 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.03	12%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.03	14%	22 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.03	20%	21 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.08	14%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–4	-0.04	10%	20 Jul →
dust2	14–16	-0.07	13%	20 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.08	23%	19 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.00	16%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–16	-0.06	15%	19 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.02	18%	19 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.05	23%	19 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.05	25%	19 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.02	15%	19 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.06	24%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.06	27%	18 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.05	20%	17 Jul →
cache	13–4	-0.01	16%	17 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.01	18%	17 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	18%	17 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	24%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–7	-0.04	10%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.06	24%	16 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.02	18%	16 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.06	12%	16 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.05	19%	16 Jul →
cache	14–16	-0.02	9%	15 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	14%	15 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.04	26%	14 Jul →
anubis	0–13	-0.07	9%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.06	12%	14 Jul →
dust2	14–16	0.06	15%	14 Jul →
cache	2–13	-0.05	16%	14 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.05	27%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.03	18%	13 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.05	19%	13 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	19%	13 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.01	25%	13 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	26%	13 Jul →
dust2	7–2	-0.08	17%	13 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.02	13%	12 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.04	17%	12 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.03	39%	12 Jul →
anubis	13–2	0.00	26%	12 Jul →
cache	16–14	0.04	22%	10 Jul →
ancient	13–6	-0.02	21%	10 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.11	16%	10 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.05	22%	10 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.10	33%	9 Jul →
ancient	9–13	0.02	19%	9 Jul →
cache	15–15	-0.00	23%	9 Jul →
mirage	4–6	0.00	8%	9 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.08	17%	5 Jul →
dust2	13–3	-0.00	21%	5 Jul →
inferno	2–13	-0.09	7%	4 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.04	15%	3 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.03	15%	3 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.07	13%	3 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.01	16%	3 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.01	18%	3 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.05	27%	3 Jul →
mirage	4–13	-0.06	11%	3 Jul →