Feet Connoisseur

Feet Connoisseur — CS2 Stats

BQ76561198246094484[U:1:285828756]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,522Tracked matches52%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.7 LearningSupport
Premier CS Rating12,831Blue band · top ~39.9% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 35 days played since 30 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 12,831 +276 30 Apr14 Sept · 30 days played
9,53413,482peak 13,48230 Apr14 Sept
13,482Peak Premier in tracked matches
35Days played since 2026-04-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 651 below peak (13,482)
  • +2,832 over 30 days · improving
  • +1,597 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 2,169 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFeet ConnoisseurFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER12,831 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim34
Positioning41
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42517Last 10042%Win rateWLLLWWLWWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +0.8pp headshot accuracy · −41ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 605ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 20

  • 8102 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim3.4
Utility6.4
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch6.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 64% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 55% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.4
Positioning4.1
Utility6.4
Mechanics1.1
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact5.6

Composite 3.7/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time604ms−18ms
first ⅓ avg 622ms → last ⅓ avg 604ms
Headshot accuracy11.9%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 12.0% → last ⅓ avg 11.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 13–2 · mirage, 19 Aug
31%Best headshot accuracy · 13–11 · anubis, 5 May
359msFastest reaction time · 3–13 · anubis, 14 Aug
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 8 Jun

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
69In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 81% over 21dust2Weakest map · 8% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS2117481%-0.00
ancientB21101148%-0.01
mirageC2191243%-0.01
dust2D131128%-0.03
anubisD72529%-0.03
cacheD61517%-0.02
nukeD61517%-0.04
overpass41325%-0.04
office1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (8% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4Matches
75%Win rate
0.63Avg K/D
47.9ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke1100%0.647.0
Inferno1100%0.404.0
Anubis10%0.649.0
Mirage1100%0.8511.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.0%Headshot accuracy
31.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.4%Spray accuracy
55.2%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
579msReaction time
19.8%T opening success
59.7%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
8.5%Flash assists
9.71HE damage / grenade
17.03Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.0197% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.8258% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

8% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–70.0124%14 Sept
ancient6–130.034%11 Sept
ancient11–13-0.033%11 Sept
cache0–13-0.0711%11 Sept
cache13–50.0116%30 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0111%30 Aug
dust22–13-0.0118%29 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0710%29 Aug
inferno9–0-0.020%29 Aug
cache15–15-0.0116%20 Aug
nuke3–13-0.115%19 Aug
dust23–13-0.0114%19 Aug
mirage13–20.228%19 Aug
mirage15–150.0711%19 Aug
inferno13–40.0017%19 Aug
dust21–13-0.0813%19 Aug
ancient16–130.0110%18 Aug
dust27–13-0.043%18 Aug
mirage9–13-0.017%18 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0214%18 Aug
cache15–150.0210%18 Aug
inferno13–100.0217%18 Aug
ancient13–100.0115%18 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0116%18 Aug
mirage16–14-0.0521%18 Aug
inferno11–13-0.019%17 Aug
nuke16–12-0.016%17 Aug
dust28–130.0320%17 Aug
ancient5–130.0114%17 Aug
inferno13–70.0413%16 Aug
mirage13–60.0115%16 Aug
anubis13–50.0010%15 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0014%15 Aug
inferno13–90.0616%15 Aug
inferno13–90.033%15 Aug
dust213–90.0110%14 Aug
dust211–13-0.0112%14 Aug
ancient13–8-0.032%14 Aug
mirage16–140.0010%14 Aug
anubis3–13-0.062%14 Aug
inferno13–20.027%13 Aug
ancient13–110.017%13 Aug
inferno13–100.0714%13 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0216%13 Aug
dust25–130.009%13 Aug
ancient13–60.0114%13 Aug
mirage13–90.0615%13 Aug
cache9–13-0.0521%11 Aug
mirage6–13-0.099%11 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0821%11 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0512%10 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0313%10 Aug
ancient13–11-0.064%10 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0514%26 Jul
ancient16–12-0.0115%26 Jul
inferno13–80.0211%23 Jul
cache15–150.012%18 Jul
ancient12–160.0317%18 Jul
ancient3–13-0.065%17 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0721%17 Jul
overpass2–13-0.057%3 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0618%3 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0120%3 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0617%26 Jun
anubis13–16-0.0519%11 Jun
ancient5–13-0.048%11 Jun
office8–13-0.0425%11 Jun
ancient14–16-0.009%9 Jun
ancient3–13-0.108%9 Jun
overpass13–9-0.037%8 Jun
inferno13–60.0117%8 Jun
ancient13–00.1416%8 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0319%8 Jun
mirage11–13-0.026%4 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0412%28 May
ancient13–5-0.0015%28 May
dust28–13-0.1119%28 May
mirage15–15-0.0417%21 May
dust29–13-0.0315%21 May
nuke9–13-0.0017%19 May
dust27–13-0.0319%11 May
ancient1–13-0.089%11 May
mirage13–7-0.043%10 May
inferno13–8-0.0313%10 May
nuke8–13-0.063%8 May
dust215–15-0.0323%8 May
mirage13–7-0.0421%7 May
anubis3–13-0.053%7 May
nuke8–13-0.0112%7 May
mirage7–13-0.088%6 May
mirage15–15-0.0512%6 May
inferno3–13-0.119%6 May
overpass9–130.006%5 May
inferno13–8-0.003%5 May
anubis13–11-0.0231%5 May
dust23–13-0.079%1 May
inferno13–5-0.007%1 May
inferno11–13-0.0513%1 May
overpass5–13-0.087%30 Apr
mirage13–2-0.037%30 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →