♢︎Henrik Ibsen♢

♢︎Henrik Ibsen♢ — CS2 Stats

NO76561198244660460[U:1:284394732]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

631Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
606Hours in CS
CSDB Rating3.8 LearningPositional Player
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 49 days played since 21 May 2024. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 9,711 -1,556 21 May – 21 Dec · 23 days played
9,71113,324peak 13,32421 May21 Dec
13,324Peak Premier in tracked matches
49Days played since 2024-05-21

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,045), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate33.0%43.8%44.8%11.8% short
Shot accuracy20.5%12.0%12.5%above
Kill/death ratio0.941.021.030.09 short
Match win rate39.6%44.7%45.2%5.6% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG♢︎Henrik Ibsen♢FACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim53
Positioning36
Utility13

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–43–9Last 10048%Win rateLWLLWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +3.0pp headshot accuracy · +79ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 642ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 623ms

Last 20

  • 9–9–2 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim5.3
Utility1.3
Positioning3.6
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 35% on CT to 14% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 613ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.3
Positioning3.6
Utility1.3
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels0.6
Win Impact2.6

Composite 3.8/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time633ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 647ms → last ⅓ avg 633ms
Headshot accuracy12.2%−1.0%
first ⅓ avg 13.2% → last ⅓ avg 12.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 9–6 · palais, 11 Dec →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · ancient, 29 Oct →
438msFastest reaction time · 5–1 · overpass, 23 Nov →
13–1Biggest win · italy, 2 Dec →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
7–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 60% over 5ancientWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
trainB158–753%-0.02
dust2C135–838%-0.02
mirageA127–558%-0.03
vertigoC125–742%-0.02
anubisB115–645%-0.02
ancientD81–713%-0.02
officeB63–350%-0.03
italyC52–340%-0.02
infernoA53–260%0.00
basalt—42–250%-0.01
nuke—43–175%-0.01
overpass—22–0100%-0.02
jura—10–10%-0.07
edin—11–0100%0.02
palais—11–0100%0.16

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

26,143Lifetime kills
0.94K/D
1,432Matches
39.6%Match win rate
33.0%Headshot %
20.5%Shot accuracy · Top 5% of Level 5 players
2,596MVPs
606Hours (in match)
2,158Bombs planted
256Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,153dust2
1,014inferno
826nuke
684vertigo
409train
107lake
98cbble
67safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

34Matches
50%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
56.3ADR
30%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage20%0.467.5
Anubis10%0.6712.0
Train10%0.8117.0
Dust210%0.8416.0
Ancient1100%1.2012.0
Inferno1100%0.5910.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.2%Headshot accuracy
34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
78.0%Counter-strafing
11.7°Preaim
613msReaction time
14.1%T opening success
35.1%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
5.8%Flash assists
8.71HE damage / grenade
6.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 12.2014% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 14.0917% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient5–130.0314%17 Aug →
dust213–40.0710%29 May →
jura9–13-0.0724%25 May →
train7–13-0.0442%25 May →
train13–7-0.037%25 May →
anubis13–11-0.023%11 Mar →
office13–8-0.066%11 Mar →
edin13–50.0213%9 Feb →
mirage13–9-0.027%9 Feb →
basalt10–13-0.0215%9 Feb →
train5–13-0.0912%17 Jan →
anubis13–90.016%17 Jan →
mirage13–3-0.0529%16 Jan →
nuke13–10-0.0310%16 Jan →
ancient12–120.0310%16 Jan →
office4–13-0.045%16 Jan →
anubis10–13-0.057%4 Jan →
italy12–12-0.0215%4 Jan →
dust28–13-0.033%4 Jan →
anubis9–130.0017%2 Jan →
inferno13–110.0114%2 Jan →
nuke13–60.0012%29 Dec →
ancient6–13-0.067%21 Dec →
dust20–9-0.0520%21 Dec →
vertigo13–60.1013%17 Dec →
mirage7–13-0.080%16 Dec →
train10–13-0.0215%15 Dec →
anubis4–13-0.0111%15 Dec →
mirage11–13-0.0613%15 Dec →
inferno9–13-0.0114%11 Dec →
train10–13-0.0414%11 Dec →
palais9–60.1615%11 Dec →
mirage13–9-0.070%9 Dec →
vertigo13–3-0.0516%9 Dec →
anubis5–13-0.050%9 Dec →
office11–13-0.064%4 Dec →
vertigo6–1-0.0413%4 Dec →
train13–10-0.096%4 Dec →
vertigo12–12-0.0317%4 Dec →
train13–9-0.0213%3 Dec →
anubis13–80.028%3 Dec →
office13–110.0015%2 Dec →
italy13–10.0611%2 Dec →
italy12–12-0.0611%2 Dec →
dust213–8-0.067%1 Dec →
office4–13-0.090%1 Dec →
basalt13–11-0.0219%1 Dec →
basalt12–120.016%1 Dec →
italy13–2-0.0114%1 Dec →
office13–80.0914%30 Nov →
basalt13–9-0.0212%29 Nov →
dust212–12-0.049%24 Nov →
inferno6–00.030%24 Nov →
train4–130.0211%23 Nov →
overpass5–1-0.020%23 Nov →
train12–120.035%23 Nov →
mirage13–11-0.0313%22 Nov →
nuke13–60.0210%20 Nov →
inferno6–13-0.009%20 Nov →
dust213–30.0712%20 Nov →
train13–9-0.043%19 Nov →
train13–50.0210%15 Nov →
train9–130.007%14 Nov →
train2–00.1240%14 Nov →
train13–11-0.047%14 Nov →
train13–7-0.0213%14 Nov →
anubis13–50.0214%13 Nov →
ancient8–13-0.090%13 Nov →
mirage8–13-0.0010%13 Nov →
ancient9–13-0.049%6 Nov →
vertigo11–130.0318%2 Nov →
vertigo13–16-0.0217%31 Oct →
dust22–13-0.1325%29 Oct →
ancient3–13-0.0844%29 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.086%29 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0211%22 Oct →
vertigo9–13-0.054%22 Oct →
italy7–13-0.060%15 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.0222%15 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0314%15 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0120%14 Oct →
vertigo13–50.028%29 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0325%25 Sept →
vertigo1–13-0.105%25 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.015%20 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.016%18 Sept →
mirage13–30.0231%18 Sept →
vertigo13–90.0110%4 Sept →
ancient8–130.0111%4 Sept →
vertigo15–15-0.0111%26 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0313%19 Aug →
dust213–5-0.053%19 Aug →
vertigo11–13-0.037%19 Aug →
mirage13–16-0.0111%3 Aug →
ancient13–90.013%3 Aug →
overpass13–9-0.0211%11 Jul →
anubis4–13-0.0513%11 Jul →
anubis13–60.0219%10 Jul →
mirage9–130.0223%5 Jun →
dust213–70.0120%21 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →