屎真香

屎真香 — CS2 Stats

SA76561198243628036[U:1:283362308]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,151Tracked matches55%Win rate2022Tracked since
2,094Hours in CS13Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,850Top 50% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~13.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Oct 2026 (22 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,850 +185 30 Jul – 23 Oct · 33 days played
18,61520,107peak 20,10730 Jul23 Oct
20,107Peak Premier in tracked matches
53Days played since 2026-07-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,257 below peak (20,107)
  • -321 over 30 days · steady
  • +185 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,150 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,595), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate41.9%45.7%46.8%4.9% short
Shot accuracy6.3%12.7%13.0%6.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.031.051.060.03 short
Match win rate46.7%45.7%46.3%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG屎真香FACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER18,850 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning61
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–43–7Last 10050%Win rateWWLWLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +6.2pp headshot accuracy · −22ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 619ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Last 20

  • 12–7–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 599ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility4.6
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels4.6
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 585ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning6.1
Utility4.6
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels6.1
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time578ms+1ms
first ⅓ avg 577ms → last ⅓ avg 578ms
Headshot accuracy18.6%−0.6%
first ⅓ avg 19.2% → last ⅓ avg 18.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–6 · mirage, 19 Aug →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 13–5 · dust2, 22 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · inferno, 10 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 29 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
4–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 56% over 16ancientWeakest map · 40% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB2413–1154%0.02
dust2A169–756%0.03
ancientC156–940%0.00
anubisB137–654%0.02
nukeB126–650%0.01
infernoA116–555%0.02
cache—41–325%-0.00
office—22–0100%0.08
vertigo—20–20%-0.03
fachwerk—10–10%0.13

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

46,515Lifetime kills
1.03K/D
2,818Matches
46.7%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
41.9%Headshot %
6.3%Shot accuracy
6,007MVPs
1,151Hours (in match)
2,345Bombs planted
684Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,032nuke
3,921dust2
3,491inferno
1,796vertigo
214train
93office
30cbble
9lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

171Matches
51%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
74.1ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient4751%1.1414.7
Dust24146%1.1716.6
Anubis3653%1.1915.6
Mirage2748%1.0813.3
Inferno1060%1.2215.0
Nuke862%1.1013.4
Cache2100%1.6720.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
38.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.1%Spray accuracy
83.5%Counter-strafing
7.8°Preaim
585msReaction time
58.5%T opening success
50.7%CT opening success
0.40Enemies flashed / flash
7.6%Flash assists
9.87HE damage / grenade
5.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3996 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–90.1330%3 Nov →
nuke13–30.0825%30 Oct →
anubis9–130.0217%30 Oct →
ancient13–10.0425%29 Oct →
mirage6–100.0424%29 Oct →
inferno13–3-0.0210%27 Oct →
dust211–130.0111%23 Oct →
inferno9–40.0729%22 Oct →
nuke13–80.0219%22 Oct →
anubis10–130.0216%21 Oct →
anubis15–15-0.025%21 Oct →
dust21–13-0.017%21 Oct →
mirage13–80.0319%18 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0210%17 Oct →
dust213–110.0129%16 Oct →
nuke9–70.0317%14 Oct →
inferno13–80.0018%14 Oct →
dust213–10.0314%14 Oct →
nuke13–70.0316%14 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0611%12 Oct →
inferno13–30.1015%12 Oct →
mirage7–130.0321%11 Oct →
inferno13–80.0322%10 Oct →
mirage13–80.0316%9 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.049%8 Oct →
mirage9–130.0219%8 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0315%5 Oct →
dust213–90.0411%4 Oct →
dust213–20.0933%4 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0539%4 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0218%1 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.0419%30 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0325%27 Sept →
anubis6–130.0121%26 Sept →
ancient11–130.0321%25 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0015%24 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0417%23 Sept →
fachwerk9–130.1313%23 Sept →
office13–70.040%23 Sept →
vertigo3–13-0.038%23 Sept →
dust213–160.0017%23 Sept →
dust213–50.0741%22 Sept →
mirage12–120.0711%21 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0114%20 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0220%20 Sept →
inferno8–80.0015%20 Sept →
dust213–80.0424%18 Sept →
anubis13–20.0627%17 Sept →
mirage13–100.1821%12 Sept →
ancient5–13-0.0120%11 Sept →
anubis13–90.0013%4 Sept →
mirage13–70.026%2 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0113%30 Aug →
inferno8–8-0.0625%28 Aug →
dust213–80.0031%28 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0012%27 Aug →
cache5–13-0.048%23 Aug →
ancient15–15-0.015%23 Aug →
nuke13–16-0.0110%22 Aug →
inferno11–130.0729%22 Aug →
ancient13–3-0.0313%21 Aug →
mirage13–50.0618%21 Aug →
ancient13–40.0720%21 Aug →
anubis13–30.0620%21 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.026%21 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0510%20 Aug →
mirage13–100.0217%20 Aug →
inferno16–120.0514%20 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0624%19 Aug →
mirage13–60.2021%19 Aug →
dust211–130.0718%19 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0218%18 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0526%18 Aug →
ancient13–80.0024%14 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0619%14 Aug →
mirage13–90.0028%13 Aug →
ancient16–140.0315%13 Aug →
nuke13–80.0030%13 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0320%13 Aug →
ancient14–16-0.0612%13 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0613%13 Aug →
anubis13–10.0722%13 Aug →
ancient13–20.1114%12 Aug →
mirage13–50.0119%12 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.0523%12 Aug →
ancient11–13-0.0620%12 Aug →
anubis13–60.0618%12 Aug →
vertigo4–9-0.0217%12 Aug →
ancient15–150.0525%12 Aug →
anubis13–70.0423%8 Aug →
dust213–50.1216%7 Aug →
nuke11–130.0717%5 Aug →
cache13–50.0812%5 Aug →
office13–90.1323%5 Aug →
inferno3–130.0226%3 Aug →
dust213–90.0214%1 Aug →
mirage13–40.0113%1 Aug →
mirage15–150.0222%31 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0510%30 Jul →
nuke13–70.0417%30 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.