SpAwNnS

SpAwNnS — CS2 Stats

SY76561198241763128[U:1:281497400]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,748Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.5 StrongPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,676 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,748 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 70 days played since 8 Feb 2024. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,919 +10,335 18 Dec18 Apr · 16 days played
14,48224,919peak 24,91918 Dec18 Apr
Faceit ELO: 2,676 +0 5 Sept14 Sept · 3 observations
2,6762,676peak 2,6765 Sept14 Sept
24,919Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,676Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
70Days played since 2024-02-08

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,676
  • Next: 3,000 ELO at 3,000 324 to go
  • Reached: 2,500 ELO · Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8
  • 2,500 ELO first seen 2026-09-05
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-05

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSpAwNnSFACEITLevel 10 · 2,676 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,676csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning70
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY60373Last 10060%Win rateWWLWWLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −0.2pp headshot accuracy · +24ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 595ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 608ms

Last 20

  • 1181 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 596ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility6.3
Positioning7.0
Opening Duels6.0
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 605ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning7.0
Utility6.3
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels4.6
Win Impact7.9

Composite 7.5/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time609ms+41ms
first ⅓ avg 568ms → last ⅓ avg 609ms
Headshot accuracy29.7%+3.5%
first ⅓ avg 26.2% → last ⅓ avg 29.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.29Best match rating · 13–1 · anubis, 2 Jan
52%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · mirage, 19 Feb
422msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · mirage, 13 Apr
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 19 Jan

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W2Current streak
87In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 69% over 13infernoWeakest map · 44% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA33211264%0.05
dust2B25131252%0.03
anubisS139469%0.03
ancientS128467%0.04
infernoC94544%0.02
vertigo32167%0.06
overpass2020%0.02
train220100%0.14
cache110100%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

4,200Matches
59%Win rate
1.29Avg K/D
91.2ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
18Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage18254%1.2418.3
Dust212360%1.4020.0
Anubis12062%1.2718.6
Ancient8044%1.1217.3
Inferno2343%1.2819.6
Vertigo1650%1.2117.0
Overpass875%1.4519.6
Nuke5100%1.8116.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.6%Headshot accuracy
36.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.0%Spray accuracy
84.9%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
605msReaction time
38.1%T opening success
58.8%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
11.4%Flash assists
11.28HE damage / grenade
9.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.1178% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–5-0.0022%7 Aug
inferno13–60.0929%17 Jul
dust211–13-0.0228%11 Jun
mirage13–100.1334%14 May
cache13–90.0337%10 May
anubis11–130.0421%2 May
dust213–90.0746%1 May
mirage4–13-0.0321%30 Apr
dust213–10-0.0431%18 Apr
dust27–13-0.0511%17 Apr
dust23–130.0221%10 Apr
dust215–150.0423%17 Mar
ancient13–100.0522%14 Mar
ancient6–13-0.0425%14 Mar
ancient13–100.1528%11 Mar
mirage13–70.0331%11 Mar
dust213–70.0334%8 Mar
mirage13–11-0.0119%8 Mar
dust220–22-0.0226%8 Mar
mirage3–13-0.0852%19 Feb
overpass5–130.0241%2 Feb
anubis13–7-0.0417%1 Feb
mirage13–10.0733%30 Jan
dust213–80.0625%30 Jan
mirage6–130.0541%24 Jan
mirage7–130.0428%23 Jan
anubis13–110.0129%22 Jan
dust213–90.0934%22 Jan
mirage11–130.0527%21 Jan
inferno13–9-0.0129%21 Jan
mirage9–130.1247%20 Jan
mirage13–00.0729%19 Jan
dust213–160.0538%19 Jan
mirage13–80.1431%18 Jan
mirage13–90.0638%18 Jan
mirage13–110.0820%18 Jan
dust213–50.1233%18 Jan
ancient13–70.0323%17 Jan
mirage13–100.0427%15 Jan
ancient6–130.1127%11 Jan
mirage13–30.1135%10 Jan
dust213–50.1927%10 Jan
dust213–60.0035%10 Jan
mirage13–40.0231%9 Jan
dust27–130.0437%8 Jan
overpass4–130.0139%6 Jan
train13–90.1327%5 Jan
mirage13–90.0838%5 Jan
mirage10–130.1638%5 Jan
ancient13–20.1640%4 Jan
mirage9–130.0228%3 Jan
mirage13–80.0534%2 Jan
inferno15–150.0630%2 Jan
anubis13–10.2945%2 Jan
anubis12–120.0637%23 Dec
vertigo13–20.2041%23 Dec
mirage7–130.0332%19 Dec
inferno14–160.0246%18 Dec
ancient13–30.0443%18 Dec
mirage9–130.0631%15 Dec
dust213–30.1146%15 Dec
mirage13–90.0823%7 Dec
dust213–40.1335%7 Dec
inferno13–70.0431%7 Dec
inferno5–130.0516%15 Apr
ancient3–13-0.0220%28 Nov
train13–50.1428%18 Nov
anubis13–11-0.0531%28 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0416%18 Aug
dust23–13-0.0621%14 Aug
anubis16–140.0622%2 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0129%29 Jul
anubis22–190.0223%27 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0110%23 Jul
dust216–140.1024%8 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0129%14 Jun
dust213–110.0429%6 May
mirage13–50.0927%6 May
inferno10–13-0.0426%5 May
vertigo13–100.0022%5 May
ancient2–13-0.0219%5 May
dust24–13-0.0130%3 May
mirage8–13-0.0424%1 May
dust211–13-0.0226%1 May
dust27–13-0.0426%30 Apr
mirage13–40.1128%30 Apr
dust213–16-0.0220%28 Apr
anubis13–110.0326%27 Apr
mirage13–100.0732%13 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0329%13 Apr
mirage13–5-0.0130%8 Apr
mirage13–70.1123%6 Apr
inferno13–60.0314%6 Apr
anubis13–16-0.0038%1 Mar
mirage13–10.0535%22 Feb
ancient13–90.0133%11 Feb
anubis13–40.0328%11 Feb
anubis13–30.0345%10 Feb
mirage11–130.0832%9 Feb
vertigo8–13-0.0219%8 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →