.mousse

.mousse — CS2 Stats

ZA76561198236483090[U:1:276217362]Steam profile ↗

1,004Tracked matches55%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating17,742Purple band · top ~17.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#7681 of 13694 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,103 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG.mousseFACEITLevel 5 · 1,103 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER17,742 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning53
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT47503Last 10047%Win rateWWWWWWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.4
Aggression5.0
Utility4.7
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 619ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning5.3
Utility4.7
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time622ms−23ms
first ⅓ avg 646ms → last ⅓ avg 622ms
Headshot accuracy16.5%−2.4%
first ⅓ avg 18.9% → last ⅓ avg 16.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — mirage 2–5
132Biggest win — mirage
6Longest win streak
W6Current streak
311In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 80% over 10anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A29161355%0.02
mirageC25111444%-0.00
infernoD1651131%0.00
ancientC125742%0.01
nukeS108280%0.05
anubisD51420%-0.00
cache21150%-0.03
overpass1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

24Matches
50%Win rate
0.85Avg K/D
68.7ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1164%0.8613.6
Dust2667%0.7311.5
Nuke20%0.6911.5
Inferno20%1.0719.0
Train10%1.0617.0
Anubis1100%1.5018.0
Ancient10%0.6215.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy
38.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.3%Spray accuracy
80.5%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
619msReaction time
21.9%T opening success
47.9%CT opening success
0.42Enemies flashed / flash
7.1%Flash assists
10.20HE damage / grenade
5.75Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4188 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.8896% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–80.0711%16 Aug
dust213–70.0431%16 Aug
dust213–100.0518%15 Aug
mirage13–30.0135%15 Aug
dust213–90.1219%15 Aug
anubis13–90.0617%15 Aug
mirage2–50.2028%15 Aug
ancient16–120.0313%14 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0111%14 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0127%13 Aug
nuke13–50.0412%13 Aug
inferno13–90.1222%7 Aug
dust210–130.0221%7 Aug
dust213–90.0519%7 Aug
inferno13–80.039%7 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0617%4 Aug
dust29–130.029%1 Aug
mirage8–130.0810%31 Jul
dust29–13-0.0620%30 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0319%29 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0312%28 Jul
dust211–13-0.0414%24 Jul
ancient13–70.0619%24 Jul
ancient15–150.0116%24 Jul
anubis10–13-0.058%23 Jul
dust213–90.0611%14 Jul
ancient14–160.0619%10 Jul
cache13–110.0315%9 Jul
inferno13–40.092%9 Jul
dust214–16-0.0313%9 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0517%6 Jul
mirage13–30.0411%29 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0119%25 Jun
dust211–13-0.0717%24 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0422%24 Jun
dust214–160.0518%23 Jun
dust213–100.0519%17 Jun
anubis10–130.0116%17 Jun
inferno5–130.027%17 Jun
dust213–50.0715%16 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0412%13 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0717%13 Jun
inferno4–13-0.005%13 Jun
dust210–13-0.0213%12 Jun
anubis9–130.0013%10 Jun
inferno9–130.0129%10 Jun
dust210–130.0610%10 Jun
inferno8–130.0219%10 Jun
dust213–80.0023%10 Jun
dust213–7-0.0211%10 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0420%9 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0220%9 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0115%9 Jun
ancient13–40.1222%9 Jun
inferno13–3-0.0126%9 Jun
mirage13–90.0329%9 Jun
dust24–130.0116%9 Jun
mirage7–130.0122%9 Jun
dust23–130.0019%9 Jun
ancient14–16-0.0413%8 Jun
overpass6–13-0.0213%8 Jun
inferno5–130.0420%8 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0516%8 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0319%8 Jun
nuke13–70.0318%5 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0320%2 Jun
mirage7–130.0624%2 Jun
mirage13–20.0319%29 May
mirage13–11-0.0521%21 May
inferno11–13-0.109%19 May
dust213–100.0716%18 May
dust213–8-0.0614%18 May
mirage4–13-0.0419%17 May
dust213–100.1313%15 May
dust215–150.0313%12 May
mirage13–8-0.0020%11 May
mirage13–80.0311%11 May
inferno2–13-0.0511%11 May
dust22–13-0.0052%9 May
nuke13–80.0027%9 May
dust213–60.0727%8 May
inferno3–13-0.0218%8 May
ancient6–130.0026%7 May
mirage1–13-0.0626%7 May
anubis15–15-0.0323%6 May
mirage8–13-0.0314%6 May
ancient13–50.0223%4 May
mirage7–130.0014%4 May
dust213–60.0425%4 May
nuke13–70.1115%3 May
nuke13–90.0921%3 May
dust213–8-0.0211%2 May
mirage7–13-0.0620%1 May
ancient13–70.0211%1 May
cache1–13-0.1040%30 Apr
nuke13–60.0716%29 Apr
dust213–80.0210%29 Apr
nuke13–60.0712%27 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0216%27 Apr
nuke7–130.0112%27 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →