AnaksimeneZ

AnaksimeneZ — CS2 Stats

TR76561198235973746[U:1:275708018]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

630Tracked matches69%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongPositional Player
CSDB Leaderboard#1806 of 221150 tracked
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 42 days played since 1 Aug 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 28,339 +4,517 14 Aug22 Nov · 29 days played
23,36128,484peak 28,48414 Aug22 Nov
28,852Peak Premier in tracked matches
42Days played since 2025-08-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAnaksimeneZFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning63
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58411Last 10058%Win rateLWLWWWWLWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +2.5pp headshot accuracy · +23ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 10

  • 631 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Last 20

  • 1451 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 616ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility4.9
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels5.4
Clutch3.0

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 587ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.3
Utility4.9
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels4.0
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time587ms+19ms
first ⅓ avg 569ms → last ⅓ avg 587ms
Headshot accuracy24.7%−0.3%
first ⅓ avg 25.1% → last ⅓ avg 24.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–2 · train, 15 Nov
75%Best headshot accuracy · 3–0 · overpass, 25 Oct
367msFastest reaction time · 13–1 · overpass, 5 Nov
13–1Biggest win · overpass, 5 Nov

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
87In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 73% over 11infernoWeakest map · 52% over 23
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A36211558%0.02
infernoB23121152%0.01
mirageB179853%0.01
overpassS118373%0.01
ancientS64267%-0.01
nuke32167%0.01
anubis21150%-0.01
train21150%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (52% over 23). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,138Matches
59%Win rate
1.28Avg K/D
83.4ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
16Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust218364%1.2216.9
Mirage16356%1.1517.5
Anubis7557%1.1316.7
Inferno7257%1.0716.2
Nuke2245%1.1016.1
Overpass1540%0.9616.8
Train3100%1.4513.7
Ancient250%0.8112.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.6%Headshot accuracy
36.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.2%Spray accuracy
82.1%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
587msReaction time
39.3%T opening success
52.5%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
14.1%Flash assists
7.32HE damage / grenade
4.40Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.2654% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno3–13-0.0758%26 Jun
inferno13–110.0125%25 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0224%24 Jun
anubis13–40.0030%22 Jun
dust213–90.0124%21 Jun
inferno13–80.0225%22 Nov
dust213–40.0326%22 Nov
inferno6–13-0.0414%22 Nov
mirage13–100.0625%19 Nov
dust212–12-0.0313%19 Nov
inferno13–60.0633%19 Nov
train6–13-0.0022%19 Nov
train13–20.1727%15 Nov
inferno13–90.0329%15 Nov
inferno13–11-0.0126%15 Nov
inferno13–8-0.0325%15 Nov
dust29–13-0.0111%14 Nov
dust213–70.1215%14 Nov
dust213–5-0.0117%14 Nov
dust213–50.0635%14 Nov
dust213–9-0.0120%14 Nov
dust28–20.1013%14 Nov
inferno8–130.0727%14 Nov
dust28–13-0.0621%14 Nov
dust20–13-0.0230%11 Nov
inferno13–70.0837%11 Nov
mirage4–130.0332%7 Nov
overpass13–10.1131%5 Nov
inferno13–40.0620%5 Nov
overpass13–7-0.0211%5 Nov
nuke11–13-0.0415%5 Nov
dust213–40.0329%5 Nov
inferno7–13-0.0824%4 Nov
inferno13–80.0123%4 Nov
mirage3–6-0.0227%3 Nov
inferno13–110.0219%3 Nov
mirage11–13-0.0527%2 Nov
inferno7–130.0418%2 Nov
dust211–130.0523%2 Nov
mirage8–13-0.0119%2 Nov
inferno7–13-0.0311%31 Oct
mirage12–160.0115%31 Oct
mirage13–40.1622%31 Oct
dust213–110.0213%30 Oct
dust213–110.0213%29 Oct
dust213–160.0124%29 Oct
overpass13–110.0123%27 Oct
nuke13–60.0334%27 Oct
dust29–130.0422%27 Oct
dust27–13-0.0218%27 Oct
overpass3–00.0075%25 Oct
mirage13–6-0.0630%25 Oct
overpass9–13-0.0323%21 Oct
dust213–40.0313%21 Oct
inferno10–130.0030%21 Oct
dust210–130.0423%19 Oct
ancient13–8-0.0714%19 Oct
dust23–13-0.0818%19 Oct
inferno16–130.0737%18 Oct
dust213–80.0426%18 Oct
dust213–11-0.0117%18 Oct
dust210–13-0.0122%17 Oct
overpass13–50.0921%16 Oct
dust211–130.0824%16 Oct
ancient13–50.0746%13 Oct
dust213–40.0525%13 Oct
mirage13–40.0315%13 Oct
mirage6–130.0232%29 Sept
mirage13–70.058%19 Sept
inferno5–9-0.0219%19 Sept
inferno13–60.1232%19 Sept
dust29–13-0.0326%16 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0131%15 Sept
ancient13–50.0526%13 Sept
nuke13–30.0626%11 Sept
mirage13–7-0.0223%7 Sept
dust213–90.0438%7 Sept
ancient13–60.0336%29 Aug
dust213–80.0214%29 Aug
dust216–130.0715%29 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0214%26 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0436%26 Aug
overpass16–130.0820%26 Aug
overpass11–13-0.0212%26 Aug
ancient3–13-0.0923%24 Aug
overpass13–7-0.0536%24 Aug
dust23–60.0823%17 Aug
dust213–100.0218%17 Aug
dust213–60.010%14 Aug
mirage16–140.0423%14 Aug
inferno14–160.0022%14 Aug
dust213–4-0.0044%14 Aug
inferno8–13-0.1322%8 Aug
dust20–4-0.0650%8 Aug
ancient1–13-0.0733%8 Aug
overpass8–13-0.0320%8 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0126%3 Aug
overpass13–70.0041%2 Aug
mirage11–130.0022%1 Aug
dust213–40.0116%1 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 10500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →