magzy — CS2 Stats

76561198225879160[U:1:265613432]

1,142Tracked matches40%Win rate2025Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.3 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating18,382Purple band · top ~14.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#2742 of 5253 tracked

FaceitLevel 8 · 1,665 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanGold Nova Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87

Positioning56

Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46–50–4Last 10046%Win rateLWLLLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.7

Aggression6.4

Utility6.0

Positioning5.6

Opening Duels2.4

Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 30% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7

Positioning5.6

Utility6.0

Mechanics8.6

Opening Duels2.4

Win Impact1.7

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time526ms−124ms

first ⅓ avg 650ms → last ⅓ avg 526ms

Headshot accuracy19.4%−5.0%

first ⅓ avg 24.4% → last ⅓ avg 19.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — inferno 9–6

13–0Biggest win — dust2

8Longest win streak

7–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 6cacheWeakest map · 26% over 19

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	23	12–11	52%	0.02
cache	D	19	5–14	26%	0.01
dust2	C	17	7–10	41%	-0.01
nuke	C	12	5–7	42%	0.02
anubis	A	11	7–4	64%	-0.00
inferno	C	10	4–6	40%	0.02
ancient	S	6	4–2	67%	0.01
vertigo	—	2	2–0	100%	0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,199Matches

50%Win rate

1.20Avg K/D

76.1ADR

48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

18%1v2 clutch win

8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	209	51%	1.09	15.2
Dust2	106	43%	1.09	16.2
Inferno	93	39%	1.13	15.3
Anubis	71	52%	1.21	15.5
Ancient	70	54%	1.18	15.2
Nuke	56	52%	1.03	14.3
Train	27	52%	1.20	15.3
Overpass	14	50%	1.03	15.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.0%Headshot accuracy

34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.4%Spray accuracy

88.6%Counter-strafing

7.0°Preaim

531msReaction time

30.5%T opening success

48.9%CT opening success

0.64Enemies flashed / flash

5.9%Flash assists

6.76HE damage / grenade

12.01Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 30.4529% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Cache

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

26% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Cache callouts & strategy →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	11–13	0.04	15%	27 Aug →
inferno	9–6	0.16	20%	27 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.08	23%	27 Aug →
cache	11–13	0.04	37%	27 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.03	31%	26 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.03	14%	25 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.03	18%	25 Aug →
ancient	13–4	-0.02	13%	25 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.00	29%	24 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.13	18%	24 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.06	12%	24 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.00	10%	23 Aug →
anubis	16–14	-0.03	20%	23 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.04	19%	23 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.04	34%	23 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.06	13%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.00	20%	22 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.05	20%	22 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.04	11%	22 Aug →
vertigo	13–11	0.00	21%	22 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.00	24%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.07	24%	22 Aug →
mirage	14–16	0.04	11%	22 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.05	37%	22 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.01	7%	21 Aug →
anubis	19–16	-0.00	8%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	18%	21 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.01	18%	21 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.01	20%	21 Aug →
vertigo	13–6	0.00	14%	20 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	26%	20 Aug →
mirage	17–19	0.00	11%	20 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	22%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.05	29%	20 Aug →
mirage	16–14	0.03	15%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.00	27%	19 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.09	24%	19 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.09	20%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.02	7%	19 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.00	6%	19 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.00	35%	18 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.02	24%	18 Aug →
mirage	16–12	-0.01	21%	18 Aug →
cache	11–13	-0.03	30%	18 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.02	22%	18 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.08	20%	18 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.06	25%	18 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.01	26%	17 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.04	12%	16 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.02	14%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.05	18%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.03	10%	16 Aug →
dust2	16–13	0.01	20%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.03	30%	16 Aug →
cache	15–15	-0.03	22%	16 Aug →
nuke	0–13	-0.02	40%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.11	19%	9 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.06	21%	9 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	33%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.05	23%	3 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.05	16%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.07	18%	2 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.03	21%	1 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.01	30%	1 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.01	19%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–16	-0.04	28%	31 Jul →
cache	15–15	0.04	22%	31 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.08	20%	31 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.01	18%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.07	34%	31 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.00	26%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.01	19%	31 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.07	30%	31 Jul →
cache	15–15	0.03	32%	30 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	13%	30 Jul →
nuke	5–13	0.01	29%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.05	19%	30 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.05	22%	30 Jul →
anubis	10–13	0.00	16%	29 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.02	23%	29 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.02	23%	29 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.05	24%	29 Jul →
dust2	15–15	0.06	24%	28 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.03	17%	28 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.04	29%	28 Jul →
nuke	5–13	-0.05	26%	28 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.06	19%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.12	26%	28 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.02	47%	28 Jul →
nuke	14–16	0.03	16%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.05	21%	27 Jul →
nuke	13–1	0.09	39%	27 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	21%	27 Jul →
inferno	6–13	0.04	26%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–4	-0.04	33%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.03	36%	27 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	18%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.02	14%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–0	0.11	24%	26 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.04	18%	26 Jul →