Trojan^

Trojan^ — CS2 Stats

GB76561198220557729[U:1:260292001]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,500Tracked matches43%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating10,348Blue band · top ~53.1% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−285Premier CS Rating · 10,633 → 10,348

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 10,348 -3,375 30 Aug – 3 Nov · 27 days played
9,79313,723peak 13,72330 Aug3 Nov
13,723Peak Premier in tracked matches
25Days played since 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,375 below peak (13,723)
  • +348 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 4,652 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTrojan^FACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER10,348 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning54
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD44–50–6Last 10044%Win rateLLWLLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +2.7pp headshot accuracy · +20ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.00), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 499ms

Last 10

  • 1–9 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 512ms

Last 20

  • 6–13–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 502ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.4 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility5.0
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels1.7
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 56% on T to 39% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning5.4
Utility5.0
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels4.3
Win Impact2.6

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time528ms−25ms
first ⅓ avg 552ms → last ⅓ avg 528ms
Headshot accuracy15.9%+0.2%
first ⅓ avg 15.7% → last ⅓ avg 15.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.05Best match rating · 13–6 · dust2, 3 Nov →
47%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · dust2, 12 Oct →
375msFastest reaction time · 13–16 · dust2, 28 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 24 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
7–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 53% over 17anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C197–1237%-0.02
ancientB179–853%-0.01
nukeB179–853%-0.02
cacheB158–753%-0.02
mirageC146–843%-0.02
infernoD124–833%-0.05
anubisD51–420%-0.02
train—10–10%-0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

24Matches
50%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
74.2ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

12%1v1 clutch win
36%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2771%1.2314.6
Ancient580%1.2011.2
Nuke450%0.7912.8
Mirage40%0.6311.8
Inferno1100%1.2714.0
Cache10%0.295.0
Vertigo10%0.569.0
Anubis10%0.356.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.8%Headshot accuracy
35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.8%Spray accuracy
83.0%Counter-strafing
6.6°Preaim
524msReaction time
56.0%T opening success
38.7%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
2.5%Flash assists
6.12HE damage / grenade
9.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 38.6803% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage3–13-0.0320%3 Nov →
mirage12–160.0332%3 Nov →
dust213–60.0524%3 Nov →
inferno10–13-0.0321%2 Nov →
anubis9–130.0111%2 Nov →
ancient9–13-0.0115%2 Nov →
inferno5–13-0.0927%2 Nov →
mirage10–13-0.0515%2 Nov →
nuke9–13-0.045%2 Nov →
dust29–13-0.037%1 Nov →
ancient11–130.0515%1 Nov →
cache5–13-0.0210%1 Nov →
nuke13–110.0311%1 Nov →
dust213–7-0.059%1 Nov →
cache13–10-0.055%31 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0918%31 Oct →
dust213–80.0326%29 Oct →
anubis15–150.0112%29 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.0233%29 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0810%28 Oct →
dust213–16-0.0224%28 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0421%28 Oct →
anubis15–15-0.0512%27 Oct →
ancient3–9-0.0123%27 Oct →
cache13–6-0.046%27 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0213%26 Oct →
ancient13–3-0.0323%26 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0213%26 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0118%26 Oct →
nuke13–4-0.083%25 Oct →
nuke13–100.0118%25 Oct →
inferno4–13-0.055%25 Oct →
mirage12–16-0.0420%25 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.1012%25 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0220%24 Oct →
nuke13–1-0.0015%24 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0033%24 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0812%24 Oct →
ancient5–13-0.0624%24 Oct →
dust26–13-0.029%24 Oct →
cache13–40.0419%24 Oct →
dust210–130.0018%23 Oct →
cache13–70.0112%23 Oct →
nuke13–100.0223%23 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0216%23 Oct →
mirage13–40.0322%22 Oct →
nuke15–15-0.096%22 Oct →
dust212–120.0215%21 Oct →
dust28–130.0321%21 Oct →
dust21–13-0.0536%19 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0320%19 Oct →
dust213–5-0.069%19 Oct →
anubis13–30.0014%19 Oct →
mirage11–130.0416%19 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0218%19 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.073%18 Oct →
inferno16–13-0.0810%18 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0617%17 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0210%17 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0419%17 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0223%17 Oct →
dust213–70.0221%17 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0429%16 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.0612%15 Oct →
train9–13-0.1210%15 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0314%15 Oct →
ancient11–130.0417%15 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0912%15 Oct →
ancient15–15-0.0210%13 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0112%13 Oct →
cache13–6-0.019%13 Oct →
ancient13–110.0410%12 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0647%12 Oct →
cache13–40.0120%12 Oct →
ancient13–110.0420%11 Oct →
nuke13–16-0.0716%11 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0413%11 Oct →
cache14–16-0.0224%11 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0433%11 Oct →
cache16–140.0219%10 Oct →
cache2–13-0.0515%10 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0412%10 Oct →
nuke15–15-0.0215%10 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.069%9 Oct →
mirage13–90.0418%9 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.038%9 Oct →
inferno13–1-0.0310%9 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0411%9 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.0810%9 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0318%8 Oct →
nuke13–4-0.0524%8 Oct →
ancient7–10.0217%8 Oct →
nuke13–6-0.0220%8 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.0212%8 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0216%7 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.059%7 Oct →
nuke14–16-0.0211%7 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0823%7 Oct →
nuke13–110.0215%7 Oct →
cache3–13-0.064%7 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.