⑳ ✓ stalfer — CS2 Stats

76561198217227125[U:1:256961397]

693Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.6 StrongAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,840Top 25% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#6928 of 51680 tracked
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG⑳ ✓ stalferFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER24,840 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim95
Positioning69
Utility35

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT62362Last 10062%Win rateWWWWWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.5
Aggression8.3
Utility3.5
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels4.9
Clutch4.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

donk

Plays most like donk 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 95 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 92% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 567ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.5
Positioning6.9
Utility3.5
Mechanics9.4
Opening Duels4.9
Win Impact8.3

Composite 7.6/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time565ms−40ms
first ⅓ avg 605ms → last ⅓ avg 565ms
Headshot accuracy21.9%+2.9%
first ⅓ avg 19.1% → last ⅓ avg 21.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — nuke 13–7
130Biggest win — dust2
8Longest win streak
W5Current streak
79In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
17Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 72% over 43ancientWeakest map · 50% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS43311272%0.04
dust2A1811761%0.05
ancientB126650%0.02
vertigoB84450%0.03
anubisA74357%0.04
inferno43175%0.08
overpass31233%0.01
cache21150%-0.02
nuke21150%0.07
train1010%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

960Matches
60%Win rate
1.46Avg K/D
96.3ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
24Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage25959%1.3319.5
Dust211557%1.2919.6
Anubis6360%1.3520.7
Ancient4755%1.4020.7
Cache2759%1.3121.1
Vertigo1362%1.2517.3
Nuke1323%0.9617.5
Inferno850%0.9916.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.1%Headshot accuracy
42.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.4%Spray accuracy
92.4%Counter-strafing
7.3°Preaim
567msReaction time
38.9%T opening success
60.3%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
7.13HE damage / grenade
2.66Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.6592 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.8985% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–100.0425%25 Jul
mirage13–20.1236%25 Jul
mirage13–90.0225%25 Jul
mirage13–50.1220%25 Jul
dust216–140.0624%16 Jun
dust24–13-0.0630%8 Jun
mirage16–130.0227%4 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0323%3 Jun
overpass13–90.0421%3 Jun
mirage19–16-0.0519%1 Jun
mirage10–130.0222%28 May
mirage13–8-0.0118%26 May
ancient13–100.0622%26 May
dust211–13-0.0215%26 May
mirage13–4-0.0028%25 May
dust213–90.0123%23 May
ancient13–6-0.0213%23 May
dust213–60.0222%22 May
ancient14–160.0633%22 May
mirage13–90.0619%22 May
mirage9–130.0213%21 May
anubis10–13-0.0115%21 May
mirage11–130.0525%21 May
anubis13–40.0433%21 May
mirage11–130.0219%21 May
overpass10–130.0119%20 May
mirage8–130.0122%20 May
dust213–80.0321%20 May
mirage13–90.0719%20 May
dust27–130.0116%20 May
anubis13–110.0627%20 May
ancient13–60.0516%20 May
cache4–13-0.0714%18 May
mirage13–80.0220%18 May
dust211–130.0528%18 May
overpass3–13-0.0114%18 May
dust213–90.0927%17 May
dust213–40.1428%14 May
mirage13–90.0422%14 May
mirage13–100.1630%14 May
dust213–50.1637%13 May
inferno9–130.0522%12 May
ancient13–100.0723%10 May
dust213–110.0329%10 May
ancient9–13-0.0714%9 May
cache13–80.0321%9 May
ancient13–60.0423%9 May
mirage13–11-0.0123%9 May
mirage13–10-0.0316%8 May
inferno13–60.0722%8 May
mirage13–70.1419%7 May
ancient13–70.0738%7 May
mirage8–130.0425%30 Apr
inferno16–130.0124%29 Apr
inferno13–100.1838%8 Dec
train12–120.0526%27 Nov
mirage12–120.0317%27 Nov
dust213–90.0733%6 Nov
dust27–130.1857%6 Nov
dust22–00.010%5 Nov
mirage13–40.0821%4 Nov
dust213–00.0720%4 Nov
ancient9–130.0227%16 Apr
mirage13–16-0.0610%6 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0612%6 Apr
mirage13–00.1620%10 Mar
dust24–130.0132%4 Mar
anubis13–40.1218%29 Dec
ancient7–13-0.0322%29 Dec
anubis13–70.0517%29 Dec
vertigo10–130.0110%28 Dec
vertigo9–13-0.0323%28 Dec
ancient9–130.0322%28 Dec
nuke13–70.1921%28 Dec
vertigo11–13-0.0413%28 Dec
mirage13–110.1516%28 Dec
vertigo13–80.1320%28 Dec
mirage5–13-0.0248%28 Dec
anubis3–130.0430%17 Dec
vertigo13–1-0.0011%17 Dec
nuke16–19-0.0414%17 Dec
mirage13–60.0326%17 Dec
mirage13–90.0710%17 Dec
mirage13–9-0.0118%17 Dec
anubis9–13-0.0524%21 Nov
mirage13–80.1522%16 Nov
vertigo13–10.0510%13 Nov
mirage13–60.0113%8 Nov
mirage13–70.0524%8 Nov
mirage19–170.0421%6 Nov
mirage13–60.1016%6 Nov
vertigo16–50.0715%11 Jul
mirage16–110.0217%11 Jul
mirage13–160.0022%11 Jul
dust212–160.0225%1 Jul
mirage19–150.0612%24 Jun
vertigo9–160.0111%23 Jun
mirage14–160.0218%23 Jun
mirage16–10-0.0413%22 Jun
mirage16–80.0224%22 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 10500 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →