ha3matophilliac

ha3matophilliac — CS2 Stats

76561198216438647[U:1:256172919]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

259Tracked matches30%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.2 LearningSupport
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 35 days played since 10 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 8,473 +219 11 May1 Jul · 20 days played
7,6189,580peak 9,58011 May1 Jul
9,580Peak Premier in tracked matches
35Days played since 2026-05-10

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGha3matophilliacFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim48
Positioning30
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD39538Last 10039%Win rateWLLLLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +1.9pp headshot accuracy · −70ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 659ms

Last 10

  • 19 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 658ms

Last 20

  • 317 · 15% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 693ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim4.8
Utility3.6
Positioning3.0
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 667ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.8
Positioning3.0
Utility3.6
Mechanics3.5
Opening Duels1.2
Win Impact0.0

Composite 3.2/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time666ms+11ms
first ⅓ avg 655ms → last ⅓ avg 666ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%−2.3%
first ⅓ avg 20.4% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 9–3 · inferno, 20 Jun
44%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · inferno, 8 Jul
313msFastest reaction time · 0–5 · ancient, 1 Jul
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 11 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
66In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 67% over 6anubisWeakest map · 0% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA25141156%0.01
nukeC1971237%-0.02
infernoD124833%-0.01
ancientD124833%-0.03
overpassC104640%0.02
anubisD7070%-0.03
dust2D71614%0.00
cacheS64267%0.02
train21150%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

18Matches
33%Win rate
0.65Avg K/D
57.0ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage933%0.7211.0
Dust2250%0.7616.0
Ancient250%0.507.0
Vertigo10%0.5610.0
Nuke10%0.759.0
Inferno10%0.386.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.4%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.4%Spray accuracy
65.6%Counter-strafing
12.1°Preaim
667msReaction time
20.0%T opening success
39.6%CT opening success
0.49Enemies flashed / flash
2.2%Flash assists
4.79HE damage / grenade
9.47Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.0907° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.492 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–10-0.0124%16 Aug
inferno2–130.0029%16 Aug
cache3–13-0.0110%2 Aug
inferno4–13-0.098%2 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0520%27 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0020%20 Jul
nuke0–13-0.0323%20 Jul
train11–13-0.0514%20 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0524%20 Jul
ancient5–13-0.043%12 Jul
mirage13–00.0911%11 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0715%11 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0811%11 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0410%11 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0615%11 Jul
mirage2–13-0.046%10 Jul
mirage9–130.0121%9 Jul
cache13–80.0326%9 Jul
ancient13–16-0.0918%9 Jul
dust23–130.0725%8 Jul
inferno13–40.0944%8 Jul
inferno7–12-0.0612%7 Jul
anubis11–130.0121%7 Jul
nuke13–70.0721%7 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0725%2 Jul
mirage13–60.005%2 Jul
ancient0–5-0.070%1 Jul
ancient12–16-0.0915%28 Jun
mirage13–70.0529%28 Jun
nuke13–0-0.0638%23 Jun
nuke13–6-0.0715%23 Jun
nuke9–60.0122%20 Jun
inferno9–30.1419%20 Jun
dust29–13-0.0225%15 Jun
nuke15–15-0.0117%15 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0412%11 Jun
mirage13–50.0230%11 Jun
overpass11–130.0525%11 Jun
overpass13–00.0017%11 Jun
mirage13–60.0017%11 Jun
dust213–16-0.0024%11 Jun
mirage13–40.0716%9 Jun
train13–40.048%9 Jun
dust28–13-0.0822%9 Jun
overpass5–13-0.0421%8 Jun
mirage13–60.0521%8 Jun
nuke4–130.1015%8 Jun
dust213–90.1122%8 Jun
overpass12–120.0214%7 Jun
overpass13–30.0418%7 Jun
nuke12–120.0127%7 Jun
mirage13–16-0.0516%6 Jun
cache10–130.0832%6 Jun
overpass8–80.1132%6 Jun
inferno1–9-0.2018%6 Jun
inferno9–60.1014%6 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0432%5 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0524%4 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0421%4 Jun
ancient13–60.0115%4 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0115%4 Jun
ancient13–30.0631%3 Jun
mirage13–30.1126%3 Jun
inferno9–40.1141%3 Jun
ancient7–130.0127%3 Jun
nuke9–13-0.0227%3 Jun
inferno3–9-0.1425%3 Jun
overpass6–9-0.0428%3 Jun
inferno8–8-0.0423%3 Jun
nuke8–80.0223%3 Jun
overpass9–3-0.0317%3 Jun
overpass3–130.0418%2 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0010%1 Jun
nuke10–13-0.0422%1 Jun
overpass13–11-0.0119%1 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0114%1 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0329%1 Jun
anubis12–120.0121%1 Jun
nuke13–16-0.0313%31 May
mirage13–5-0.0323%31 May
dust21–13-0.0732%30 May
mirage16–130.0727%30 May
mirage10–130.0114%30 May
ancient13–5-0.0223%30 May
nuke6–13-0.0221%29 May
nuke16–14-0.0517%29 May
nuke10–13-0.1017%28 May
anubis1–13-0.0923%28 May
mirage4–130.0030%28 May
mirage16–14-0.0124%21 May
nuke7–130.0114%21 May
ancient11–130.0117%19 May
anubis10–13-0.0316%19 May
mirage13–90.1030%13 May
mirage4–13-0.0521%11 May
nuke13–4-0.0018%11 May
cache13–20.0818%11 May
ancient11–13-0.0314%10 May
cache13–3-0.0313%10 May
dust212–120.0027%10 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →