morekno

morekno — CS2 Stats

76561198215022529[U:1:254756801]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,484Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating14,999Blue band · top ~28.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,132 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 32 days played since 29 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,999 -119 29 May – 20 Sept · 27 days played
13,77916,671peak 16,67129 May20 Sept
16,671Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,132Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-05-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,132
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 69 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,672 below peak (16,671)
  • -713 over 30 days · declining
  • 0 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmoreknoFACEITLevel 5 · 1,132 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER14,999 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,132csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning47
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–48–5Last 10047%Win rateWLLWWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −4.2pp headshot accuracy · −13ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 583ms

Last 20

  • 10–10 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility5.3
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels1.2
Clutch1.0

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 38 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 41% on T to 26% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 585ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning4.7
Utility5.3
Mechanics8.5
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact4.4

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time587ms−79ms
first ⅓ avg 667ms → last ⅓ avg 587ms
Headshot accuracy18.0%+1.1%
first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 18.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–2 · inferno, 14 Jul →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · ancient, 15 Sept →
469msFastest reaction time · 13–1 · inferno, 4 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 4 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
8–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
16Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 80% over 5infernoWeakest map · 33% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C249–1538%0.01
nukeB1910–953%0.01
infernoD155–1033%-0.00
cacheB147–750%0.01
ancientA149–564%-0.00
mirageD62–433%-0.03
overpassS54–180%0.01
anubis—31–233%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

35Matches
63%Win rate
1.42Avg K/D
76.6ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke7100%1.5115.7
Inferno367%1.5518.3
Ancient367%0.9515.0
Anubis20%1.0918.0
Dust22100%2.9214.0
Cache250%1.0812.5
Vertigo10%0.5010.0
Mirage10%1.1120.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.3%Headshot accuracy
36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.6%Spray accuracy
88.3%Counter-strafing
7.8°Preaim
585msReaction time
41.2%T opening success
25.8%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
5.0%Flash assists
7.03HE damage / grenade
9.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 25.7914% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–40.1218%20 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.049%20 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0410%16 Sept →
dust213–80.0111%16 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0114%15 Sept →
nuke13–50.0418%15 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0736%15 Sept →
dust213–60.0518%6 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.096%6 Sept →
ancient16–140.0826%4 Sept →
inferno13–10.1423%4 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0226%4 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0524%4 Sept →
nuke13–60.1125%4 Sept →
dust213–70.0619%4 Sept →
inferno6–130.0421%25 Aug →
dust23–130.0221%25 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0011%25 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0316%23 Aug →
dust24–130.0123%23 Aug →
mirage7–130.0217%23 Aug →
cache13–90.1019%22 Aug →
nuke16–13-0.0214%22 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0623%22 Aug →
nuke13–100.0913%22 Aug →
ancient13–4-0.0315%18 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0311%18 Aug →
cache15–150.0616%14 Aug →
inferno12–16-0.0620%14 Aug →
dust212–16-0.0223%14 Aug →
ancient15–150.0217%14 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0711%11 Aug →
dust28–130.0119%11 Aug →
inferno13–100.0613%11 Aug →
ancient13–60.037%11 Aug →
nuke13–60.0211%7 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0330%7 Aug →
dust213–90.0717%6 Aug →
inferno2–13-0.0323%6 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0318%22 Jul →
nuke13–2-0.0618%22 Jul →
cache5–13-0.1110%22 Jul →
ancient8–13-0.0317%20 Jul →
cache13–6-0.0314%20 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0215%20 Jul →
dust213–100.0013%19 Jul →
cache11–130.0620%19 Jul →
nuke16–120.0225%19 Jul →
ancient13–10-0.1021%19 Jul →
dust213–30.1020%18 Jul →
nuke13–110.0424%18 Jul →
cache11–13-0.044%17 Jul →
cache13–30.0412%17 Jul →
anubis16–13-0.0611%17 Jul →
dust213–16-0.0525%17 Jul →
ancient13–60.0112%17 Jul →
mirage4–13-0.0818%16 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.0617%16 Jul →
cache13–70.0412%16 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0211%15 Jul →
inferno13–50.0523%15 Jul →
anubis15–15-0.019%15 Jul →
nuke7–130.0120%14 Jul →
inferno13–20.1533%14 Jul →
ancient13–7-0.0810%14 Jul →
cache13–11-0.0221%11 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0417%11 Jul →
nuke14–16-0.0111%11 Jul →
nuke3–13-0.059%11 Jul →
mirage12–16-0.0615%10 Jul →
dust213–50.0428%10 Jul →
dust24–13-0.0619%2 Jul →
anubis15–15-0.0712%2 Jul →
dust213–10-0.0225%2 Jul →
inferno13–4-0.0110%1 Jul →
dust213–160.0924%1 Jul →
overpass13–70.0215%1 Jul →
ancient13–7-0.0014%24 Jun →
nuke13–8-0.0111%24 Jun →
overpass13–30.0522%24 Jun →
nuke11–130.016%17 Jun →
dust213–100.0317%17 Jun →
inferno10–130.0321%10 Jun →
dust210–13-0.0224%10 Jun →
nuke11–130.059%10 Jun →
inferno5–13-0.0714%5 Jun →
overpass11–130.0316%5 Jun →
dust29–130.0122%5 Jun →
inferno2–13-0.0917%5 Jun →
mirage7–13-0.0316%5 Jun →
ancient15–15-0.0319%5 Jun →
nuke7–13-0.0028%5 Jun →
overpass13–11-0.0519%3 Jun →
dust213–16-0.0214%3 Jun →
ancient13–60.0122%3 Jun →
overpass13–11-0.0210%3 Jun →
nuke13–110.0614%2 Jun →
ancient8–130.089%2 Jun →
inferno2–13-0.0829%2 Jun →
ancient13–60.1018%29 May →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →