MeatFeet

MeatFeet — CS2 Stats

76561198212411211[U:1:252145483]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,281Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.0 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating21,735Top 50% of 205,416 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#57679 of 252478 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,242 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Oct 2026 (13 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,735 +1,621 2 Aug – 4 Oct · 23 days played
20,11422,126peak 22,1262 Aug4 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,242 +0 28 Aug – 3 Sept · 3 observations
1,2421,242peak 1,24228 Aug3 Sept
22,126Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,242Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
41Days played since 2026-08-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,242
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 109 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 391 below peak (22,126)
  • +369 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,265 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMeatFeetFACEITLevel 8 · 1,242 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER21,735 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,242csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning61
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT52–44–4Last 10052%Win rateWLWTLWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −0.2pp headshot accuracy · +25ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 619ms

Last 10

  • 7–2–1 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim7.8
Utility6.6
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch3.4

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 59% on T to 44% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning6.1
Utility6.6
Mechanics8.3
Opening Duels5.3
Win Impact5.6

Composite 7.0/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time546ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 576ms → last ⅓ avg 546ms
Headshot accuracy17.6%−2.9%
first ⅓ avg 20.5% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 12–1 · inferno, 17 Sept →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–0 · dust2, 29 Sept →
406msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · ancient, 9 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 29 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
6–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 75% over 16ancientWeakest map · 36% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2912–1741%-0.00
infernoS1612–475%0.02
cacheB147–750%0.01
dust2B136–746%-0.00
ancientC114–736%-0.02
nukeS64–267%-0.01
anubis—43–175%-0.03
vertigo—32–167%-0.02
overpass—31–233%0.03
train—11–0100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,368Matches
51%Win rate
0.96Avg K/D
70.7ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage9660%0.8812.9
Inferno5459%0.8813.7
Ancient5042%0.8313.0
Dust24646%0.8914.0
Nuke2245%0.8313.3
Anubis1833%0.9214.1
Overpass1464%1.0316.9
Vertigo1164%0.9813.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.1%Headshot accuracy
37.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.1%Spray accuracy
87.1%Counter-strafing
11.8°Preaim
546msReaction time
58.9%T opening success
43.6%CT opening success
0.72Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
11.51HE damage / grenade
12.40Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo13–5-0.0512%17 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0816%13 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0020%10 Oct →
dust215–150.0224%4 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0213%4 Oct →
mirage13–60.0011%4 Oct →
inferno13–90.0011%3 Oct →
dust213–0-0.0250%29 Sept →
anubis13–5-0.0210%29 Sept →
anubis13–5-0.1013%29 Sept →
nuke13–40.0716%27 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0519%27 Sept →
mirage15–19-0.0616%26 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.1010%26 Sept →
nuke13–50.0218%26 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0129%22 Sept →
mirage13–110.0212%21 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0323%21 Sept →
mirage16–140.0420%20 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0020%19 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0312%18 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0024%18 Sept →
overpass4–130.0615%17 Sept →
train13–100.0423%17 Sept →
inferno12–10.1121%17 Sept →
cache13–20.005%17 Sept →
dust26–13-0.1017%16 Sept →
mirage13–40.0314%16 Sept →
mirage11–130.0411%16 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0315%16 Sept →
dust213–80.0123%12 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0024%12 Sept →
dust213–10.0016%10 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0211%9 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0513%9 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.058%8 Sept →
anubis10–130.0029%6 Sept →
inferno13–2-0.009%31 Aug →
ancient11–130.0022%31 Aug →
mirage13–70.0717%31 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0228%29 Aug →
inferno13–70.0723%29 Aug →
mirage2–13-0.0213%26 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0125%25 Aug →
mirage6–130.0112%24 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0131%24 Aug →
mirage8–130.0916%24 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0016%24 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0218%24 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0318%23 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0416%23 Aug →
vertigo13–30.056%21 Aug →
mirage15–15-0.0112%20 Aug →
mirage13–50.067%20 Aug →
cache13–40.0519%20 Aug →
inferno13–90.0512%17 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0323%16 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0225%15 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0016%15 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0119%15 Aug →
dust213–80.0918%15 Aug →
mirage13–70.0511%15 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0427%13 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.090%13 Aug →
inferno13–110.0410%13 Aug →
cache13–60.0516%12 Aug →
cache13–7-0.0017%10 Aug →
cache10–130.0411%10 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0520%10 Aug →
inferno13–50.0121%10 Aug →
overpass4–13-0.0517%9 Aug →
mirage13–60.0126%9 Aug →
ancient13–90.0511%9 Aug →
dust27–130.0336%9 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0210%7 Aug →
mirage13–10.0220%7 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0821%6 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0528%6 Aug →
inferno13–50.0518%6 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.1119%6 Aug →
vertigo8–13-0.0722%6 Aug →
cache8–130.0120%6 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0425%5 Aug →
mirage13–90.0316%5 Aug →
inferno13–80.1024%5 Aug →
cache13–60.0430%5 Aug →
ancient12–120.0033%5 Aug →
overpass13–100.0811%5 Aug →
dust213–100.0328%5 Aug →
anubis13–50.0029%4 Aug →
ancient8–130.0122%4 Aug →
inferno13–40.0420%4 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0312%4 Aug →
mirage13–20.0220%4 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0215%4 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0614%3 Aug →
ancient13–90.0017%3 Aug →
nuke13–3-0.0323%2 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.0115%2 Aug →
mirage15–150.0125%2 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.