saikyo

saikyo — CS2 Stats

AU76561198212345900[U:1:252080172]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,697Tracked matches64%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.8 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating25,474Top 10% of 192,959 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#16393 of 239581 tracked
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 43 days played since 29 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,474 -1,498 29 Mar20 Sept · 38 days played
24,70727,600peak 27,60029 Mar20 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,274 +0 1 Sept11 Sept · 4 observations
2,2742,274peak 2,2741 Sept11 Sept
27,829Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,274Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
43Days played since 2026-03-29

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,274
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 226 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,126 below peak (27,600)
  • +767 over 30 days · improving
  • -1,249 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 4,526 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsaikyoPREMIER25,474 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,274csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning69
Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54397Last 10054%Win rateWLWLWWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +4.0pp headshot accuracy · +19ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 566ms

Last 20

  • 1271 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 556ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.6
Utility5.6
Positioning6.9
Opening Duels6.2
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 64% on CT to 41% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 567ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.9
Utility5.6
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels5.6
Win Impact9.8

Composite 7.8/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time569ms−32ms
first ⅓ avg 601ms → last ⅓ avg 569ms
Headshot accuracy24.3%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 24.5% → last ⅓ avg 24.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–3 · dust2, 6 Jun
67%Best headshot accuracy · 16–14 · dust2, 23 Jun
414msFastest reaction time · 13–0 · nuke, 28 Jun
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 9 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
67In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
15Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 63% over 30mirageWeakest map · 49% over 37
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB37181949%0.02
dust2A30191163%0.02
ancientB126650%0.02
infernoB84450%-0.01
anubis42250%0.02
nuke440100%0.07
cache3030%0.01
overpass21150%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (49% over 37). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,551Matches
52%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
75.6ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage44252%1.0815.5
Ancient20553%1.0815.9
Dust215251%1.0214.8
Anubis14753%1.0214.9
Vertigo8251%1.1016.1
Inferno5441%0.9614.3
Nuke3549%1.0015.8
Train2352%0.9413.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.9%Headshot accuracy
37.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
82.4%Counter-strafing
8.7°Preaim
567msReaction time
41.0%T opening success
63.6%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
9.3%Flash assists
8.88HE damage / grenade
10.54Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

49% win rate across 37 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–7-0.0420%20 Sept
mirage9–13-0.0822%20 Sept
dust213–10.0633%20 Sept
dust214–160.0132%7 Sept
dust213–10.0323%30 Aug
mirage13–50.0948%30 Aug
ancient13–60.0216%29 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0222%29 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0127%24 Aug
dust216–13-0.0423%24 Aug
dust213–70.0018%23 Aug
mirage13–60.0313%23 Aug
cache13–160.0331%22 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0422%22 Aug
mirage11–130.0229%22 Aug
dust213–50.0322%18 Aug
ancient13–70.0321%17 Aug
dust216–130.0319%18 Jul
cache15–150.0526%18 Jul
anubis13–70.0525%15 Jul
dust213–110.0542%15 Jul
mirage13–100.0426%15 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0324%10 Jul
nuke13–100.0433%10 Jul
dust24–13-0.0320%9 Jul
mirage5–130.0530%9 Jul
mirage13–00.0720%9 Jul
dust213–70.0112%5 Jul
dust213–30.0622%5 Jul
mirage15–150.0322%4 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0610%2 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0227%2 Jul
mirage13–160.0625%30 Jun
mirage3–13-0.1020%30 Jun
inferno13–50.0629%28 Jun
anubis5–13-0.0813%28 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0126%28 Jun
nuke13–00.1324%28 Jun
mirage0–90.0233%28 Jun
mirage13–110.0420%28 Jun
ancient13–30.0237%25 Jun
mirage9–50.0423%25 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0132%24 Jun
dust25–13-0.0130%24 Jun
anubis13–60.1023%24 Jun
dust216–140.0467%23 Jun
mirage13–50.0855%23 Jun
dust213–110.0222%20 Jun
overpass13–80.0522%20 Jun
mirage13–70.0421%20 Jun
dust211–13-0.0216%18 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0121%17 Jun
nuke13–00.0441%17 Jun
mirage11–130.0323%17 Jun
dust29–130.0221%16 Jun
nuke13–80.0826%16 Jun
dust28–13-0.0030%15 Jun
inferno13–6-0.0429%15 Jun
ancient15–150.0523%14 Jun
dust210–13-0.0032%14 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0118%13 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0820%13 Jun
dust213–30.1627%6 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0327%6 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0040%24 May
dust28–130.0112%24 May
dust213–40.0421%20 May
mirage16–140.0423%20 May
ancient13–2-0.0121%20 May
cache11–13-0.0422%3 May
inferno13–6-0.0811%25 Apr
mirage9–130.0523%25 Apr
ancient8–130.0135%25 Apr
inferno7–13-0.0618%24 Apr
ancient3–130.0129%24 Apr
mirage13–60.0524%24 Apr
dust215–150.0829%23 Apr
ancient13–50.0115%23 Apr
anubis9–130.0324%23 Apr
mirage6–130.0624%18 Apr
mirage15–150.0534%18 Apr
dust27–130.0117%18 Apr
dust22–13-0.0526%13 Apr
mirage13–70.0919%13 Apr
inferno13–60.0629%13 Apr
ancient13–80.0619%12 Apr
dust213–40.0726%5 Apr
mirage13–100.0227%5 Apr
dust213–100.0127%4 Apr
ancient9–130.0235%4 Apr
overpass9–130.0328%4 Apr
ancient12–120.0131%31 Mar
mirage5–13-0.0025%31 Mar
mirage13–80.0529%31 Mar
dust213–70.0321%31 Mar
mirage13–80.0426%30 Mar
dust216–14-0.0427%29 Mar
mirage13–30.0527%29 Mar
inferno15–150.0120%29 Mar
dust213–6-0.0319%29 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →