.qwepsyyy

.qwepsyyy — CS2 Stats

GB76561198207660020[U:1:247394292]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,148Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,626Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidSupport
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning57
Utility73

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58393Last 10058%Win rateLLWWWWWTWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution leads the profile while opening activity stays low.

Aim8.8
Aggression4.4
Utility7.3
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch3.8

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Flashes. 0.82 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 554ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.7
Utility7.3
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time535ms−61ms
first ⅓ avg 596ms → last ⅓ avg 535ms
Headshot accuracy21.2%−4.7%
first ⅓ avg 25.9% → last ⅓ avg 21.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.25Best rating — overpass 13–4
130Biggest win — inferno
9Longest win streak
L2Current streak
97In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 82% over 11ancientWeakest map · 40% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B22101245%0.01
mirageB21101148%0.04
ancientC156940%-0.00
infernoS128467%0.06
anubisS119282%0.02
overpassS107370%0.05
train330100%0.07
cache220100%0.07
grail21150%0.03
nuke110100%0.03
vertigo110100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

211,521Lifetime kills
1.01K/D
6,380Matches
48.0%Match win rate · Top 50% of tracked players
52.9%Headshot % · Top 25% of tracked players
18.7%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of tracked players
19,433MVPs
5,626Hours (in match)
13,976Bombs planted
3,781Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4789,597
AWP28,980
P2503,826
Knife2,720
UMP-451,793

Lifetime map wins

16,571dust2
7,879inferno
2,780train
2,778cbble
1,063nuke
180bank
179vertigo
149lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,113Matches
52%Win rate
1.31Avg K/D
73.0ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8558%1.2316.1
Overpass6166%1.2917.4
Anubis6146%1.2015.7
Ancient6050%1.1615.2
Inferno4860%1.1916.0
Dust24058%1.3416.0
Nuke1250%1.1017.1
Cache875%1.2015.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.5%Headshot accuracy
39.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.5%Spray accuracy
79.3%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
554msReaction time
20.3%T opening success
43.9%CT opening success
0.82Enemies flashed / flash
17.5%Flash assists
10.03HE damage / grenade
11.17Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.2662% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis12–16-0.0127%11 Aug
dust23–13-0.060%1 Aug
cache13–60.1021%1 Aug
inferno13–00.0730%1 Aug
dust213–4-0.0137%1 Aug
inferno13–90.1233%1 Aug
mirage13–110.0329%13 Jul
dust215–150.0518%4 Jul
mirage13–60.0115%4 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0017%4 Jul
dust26–13-0.0020%23 May
inferno2–70.0935%23 May
dust22–130.0123%19 May
ancient2–13-0.086%19 May
dust213–90.0521%17 May
ancient6–13-0.0428%16 May
mirage13–60.0512%16 May
overpass2–13-0.0215%9 May
dust25–13-0.0133%9 May
cache13–110.0423%30 Apr
mirage13–80.0220%24 Apr
nuke13–90.0315%14 Apr
mirage1–13-0.0529%14 Apr
anubis13–30.0010%12 Apr
anubis16–140.0522%10 Apr
ancient13–70.0321%10 Apr
dust213–80.0838%9 Apr
ancient11–130.0411%9 Apr
ancient10–13-0.0412%4 Apr
inferno7–130.0120%4 Apr
mirage8–130.0414%4 Apr
mirage13–70.0818%4 Apr
inferno13–60.1328%4 Apr
overpass13–40.2515%4 Apr
inferno13–4-0.0012%4 Apr
anubis13–110.0313%4 Apr
dust213–50.0424%4 Apr
anubis13–40.0328%4 Apr
inferno13–10.1620%3 Apr
vertigo13–3-0.0118%3 Apr
inferno7–12-0.0832%26 Mar
dust215–15-0.0421%29 Dec
dust24–4-0.0340%29 Dec
ancient10–13-0.0120%20 Dec
dust25–13-0.0234%18 Dec
dust213–20.0440%15 Dec
mirage6–130.0420%27 Oct
ancient7–13-0.0810%23 Oct
mirage4–13-0.0527%23 Oct
ancient2–13-0.0420%23 Oct
ancient13–110.0022%13 Sept
ancient13–50.0920%13 Sept
overpass13–5-0.0117%13 Sept
dust26–13-0.0613%25 Jul
overpass13–40.0424%25 Jul
overpass9–13-0.0113%20 Jul
inferno11–130.0624%20 Jul
inferno16–13-0.0029%20 Jul
inferno13–50.0520%20 Jul
overpass13–110.1041%20 Jul
overpass8–130.0617%20 Jul
overpass13–70.0325%20 Jul
ancient13–110.0419%19 Jul
train13–70.0629%18 Jul
inferno13–00.1218%18 Jul
dust22–13-0.0018%12 Jul
train13–50.0618%29 Jun
mirage11–130.0324%29 Jun
dust213–20.1116%28 Jun
dust28–13-0.0331%28 Jun
anubis16–13-0.0029%27 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0221%27 Jun
anubis7–130.0118%27 Jun
ancient13–80.0436%15 Jun
anubis13–30.0118%15 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0125%14 Jun
dust213–30.0514%14 Jun
ancient13–50.0620%14 Jun
mirage15–150.0411%14 Jun
dust213–100.0441%14 Jun
grail13–70.0219%9 May
grail5–130.0414%9 May
mirage7–13-0.0327%21 Apr
dust22–7-0.0156%21 Apr
dust214–160.0131%14 Mar
dust213–60.0638%18 Feb
mirage13–40.1329%4 Feb
mirage9–50.0453%22 Jan
mirage5–130.0426%9 Jan
mirage13–90.1041%20 Dec
ancient5–4-0.0433%6 Dec
mirage13–40.1228%3 Dec
train13–110.0817%1 Dec
overpass13–50.0517%25 Feb
anubis16–130.0127%25 Feb
mirage13–50.1420%25 Feb
anubis13–60.0625%25 Feb
anubis13–6-0.008%25 Feb
mirage9–130.0423%18 Feb
overpass13–70.0219%18 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2.5K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →