Pipo

Pipo — CS2 Stats

76561198204581900[U:1:244316172]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,029Tracked matches41%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,157Top 50% of 215,386 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~11.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#98183 of 261515 tracked
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Nov 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,029 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,157 -1,125 28 Jul – 5 Nov · 35 days played
17,49521,569peak 21,56928 Jul5 Nov
21,569Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,854Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
35Days played since 2026-07-27

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,412 below peak (21,569)
  • +1,235 over 30 days · improving
  • +299 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 843 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-02
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-02

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPipoFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER19,157 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,854csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning71
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–42–3Last 10055%Win rateWLWWWWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −4.1pp headshot accuracy · +62ms reaction

Win rate up 50pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.03), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 514ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 589ms

Last 20

  • 7–12–1 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 558ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility6.8
Positioning7.1
Opening Duels5.6
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 63% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 63% on CT to 45% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning7.1
Utility6.8
Mechanics6.2
Opening Duels6.1
Win Impact2.1

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time551ms+39ms
first ⅓ avg 513ms → last ⅓ avg 551ms
Headshot accuracy17.7%+3.8%
first ⅓ avg 13.9% → last ⅓ avg 17.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 13–7 · dust2, 3 Aug →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–13 · dust2, 18 Aug →
367msFastest reaction time · 1–2 · nuke, 13 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 16 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
7–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 78% over 18ancientWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC197–1237%0.02
infernoS1814–478%0.03
anubisB168–850%0.01
dust2A169–756%0.04
nukeA138–562%0.04
cacheA117–464%0.02
ancientD72–529%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

961Matches
52%Win rate
1.16Avg K/D
83.0ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust226456%1.1716.1
Inferno14255%1.2116.4
Mirage13149%1.2016.5
Nuke12551%1.1817.1
Anubis11250%1.1216.8
Ancient10045%1.0515.7
Cache3152%0.9415.2
Train1963%1.1816.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.7%Headshot accuracy
39.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.5%Spray accuracy
77.9%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
548msReaction time
45.4%T opening success
63.5%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
10.6%Flash assists
11.30HE damage / grenade
12.74Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–100.0311%1 Nov →
anubis10–13-0.0016%1 Nov →
anubis13–110.068%15 Oct →
cache13–80.0410%15 Oct →
dust213–110.0611%3 Oct →
anubis13–90.0414%3 Oct →
mirage2–6-0.0518%31 Aug →
anubis13–40.0319%31 Aug →
ancient13–16-0.0115%30 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0016%30 Aug →
cache13–60.0013%29 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0121%29 Aug →
inferno9–130.0512%27 Aug →
mirage8–130.0218%27 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0020%26 Aug →
cache6–130.0429%26 Aug →
dust210–130.0826%26 Aug →
nuke8–130.1118%25 Aug →
mirage6–130.085%24 Aug →
ancient12–120.1116%23 Aug →
mirage13–30.1115%23 Aug →
dust213–70.0314%20 Aug →
dust20–13-0.07100%18 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0011%17 Aug →
nuke13–90.1415%17 Aug →
mirage9–130.0713%17 Aug →
mirage13–160.0412%17 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0313%17 Aug →
mirage13–70.0010%17 Aug →
inferno13–8-0.0013%16 Aug →
ancient13–10.0221%16 Aug →
inferno13–70.0422%16 Aug →
dust25–13-0.059%16 Aug →
dust213–110.049%16 Aug →
dust213–100.1012%15 Aug →
dust22–6-0.0338%15 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0432%15 Aug →
nuke6–13-0.0013%15 Aug →
dust29–130.0327%14 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0114%14 Aug →
inferno13–50.0620%14 Aug →
mirage13–70.0319%14 Aug →
nuke1–20.0117%13 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0115%12 Aug →
cache19–16-0.0323%12 Aug →
nuke13–11-0.0311%12 Aug →
cache13–8-0.0111%11 Aug →
cache13–20.0512%11 Aug →
inferno16–120.019%11 Aug →
dust213–30.0518%11 Aug →
inferno0–6-0.139%11 Aug →
dust213–90.0514%10 Aug →
anubis15–150.0320%9 Aug →
nuke13–70.0918%9 Aug →
mirage10–130.1111%8 Aug →
mirage13–30.0616%8 Aug →
ancient13–90.0511%8 Aug →
nuke15–150.0215%8 Aug →
nuke25–23-0.0211%7 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0310%7 Aug →
ancient0–3-0.200%6 Aug →
nuke1–5-0.0711%6 Aug →
anubis1–20.0413%6 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0128%5 Aug →
cache13–10.069%5 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.029%5 Aug →
inferno13–90.0512%4 Aug →
inferno7–130.0114%4 Aug →
mirage13–9-0.0111%4 Aug →
inferno13–60.0022%4 Aug →
inferno13–100.0426%3 Aug →
inferno13–90.0718%3 Aug →
inferno13–90.0613%3 Aug →
dust213–70.2518%3 Aug →
ancient6–130.0423%3 Aug →
inferno13–60.068%3 Aug →
anubis12–160.0112%2 Aug →
nuke13–30.1713%2 Aug →
anubis13–70.0418%2 Aug →
inferno13–90.0113%1 Aug →
cache8–130.0011%1 Aug →
cache7–130.0716%1 Aug →
cache17–19-0.0115%1 Aug →
nuke13–10.074%1 Aug →
ancient9–130.0119%31 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.0213%31 Jul →
anubis13–80.017%31 Jul →
dust213–100.0210%30 Jul →
inferno13–20.109%29 Jul →
anubis13–100.0413%29 Jul →
mirage13–70.0924%29 Jul →
anubis0–5-0.110%28 Jul →
dust213–20.0318%28 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.019%28 Jul →
mirage0–5-0.1014%28 Jul →
inferno13–4-0.017%28 Jul →
anubis13–11-0.0214%28 Jul →
cache22–190.0212%28 Jul →
nuke13–90.0512%27 Jul →
inferno13–70.0621%27 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.