Nicockolaus

Nicockolaus — CS2 Stats

CA76561198204498560[U:1:244232832]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,785Tracked matches63%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.1 StrongAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating26,293Top 10% of 205,052 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#10674 of 252125 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,319 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,293 -1,630 28 Aug – 15 Oct · 27 days played
25,80428,667peak 28,66728 Aug15 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,319 +0 28 Aug – 4 Oct · 5 observations
1,3191,319peak 1,31928 Aug4 Oct
28,813Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,319Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,319
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 32 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,374 below peak (28,667)
  • -346 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 3,707 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNicockolausFACEITLevel 8 · 1,319 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER26,293 · Red band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,319csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning61
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51–45–4Last 10051%Win rateWWWWWWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +4.4pp headshot accuracy · +17ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 20

  • 10–8–2 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim7.5
Utility6.0
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels5.5
Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 59% on CT to 44% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 553ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning6.1
Utility6.0
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels5.3
Win Impact9.3

Composite 7.1/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time561ms−24ms
first ⅓ avg 585ms → last ⅓ avg 561ms
Headshot accuracy22.0%−3.7%
first ⅓ avg 25.6% → last ⅓ avg 22.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–1 · mirage, 3 Sept →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · cache, 6 Sept →
422msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · mirage, 8 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · cache, 15 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W6Current streak
8–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 80% over 5mirageWeakest map · 39% over 36
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC3614–2239%-0.01
anubisB137–654%-0.01
cacheB126–650%-0.03
ancientS97–278%-0.03
dust2C94–544%-0.04
infernoB84–450%-0.04
vertigoS54–180%0.02
nukeA53–260%-0.01
overpass—11–0100%0.02
train—11–0100%0.02
office—10–10%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 36). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

608Matches
51%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
80.5ADR
56%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage20952%0.9915.7
Ancient8852%0.9515.0
Dust28042%0.9415.8
Anubis7451%1.0315.5
Nuke5042%1.0316.0
Vertigo4168%1.4117.0
Inferno2952%0.9714.4
Cache1850%0.8713.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.0%Headshot accuracy
34.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.7%Spray accuracy
78.2%Counter-strafing
8.6°Preaim
553msReaction time
43.8%T opening success
59.0%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
5.9%Flash assists
7.61HE damage / grenade
12.83Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 36 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–9-0.015%16 Oct →
mirage13–30.1336%16 Oct →
vertigo13–90.0230%16 Oct →
cache13–1-0.0233%15 Oct →
ancient16–12-0.0518%15 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0532%14 Oct →
vertigo4–13-0.0135%13 Oct →
overpass13–90.0223%13 Oct →
ancient7–130.0116%12 Oct →
nuke1–13-0.0113%12 Oct →
mirage12–12-0.0220%11 Oct →
train13–100.0222%11 Oct →
dust211–130.0117%11 Oct →
dust213–7-0.0318%10 Oct →
cache15–150.0127%10 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0318%9 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0118%9 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0315%8 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0019%8 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0124%8 Oct →
anubis13–80.0424%7 Oct →
mirage11–130.0318%7 Oct →
mirage12–12-0.0310%7 Oct →
mirage13–30.0323%6 Oct →
mirage13–10.0533%6 Oct →
mirage13–3-0.0321%4 Oct →
cache13–8-0.0522%4 Oct →
anubis13–10-0.0422%4 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0318%4 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0432%4 Oct →
anubis13–100.0222%3 Oct →
mirage1–6-0.0220%3 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0220%3 Oct →
mirage5–130.0024%3 Oct →
mirage13–90.0134%3 Oct →
mirage10–130.0219%2 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.0610%2 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.0622%2 Oct →
inferno14–16-0.0624%2 Oct →
mirage16–140.0024%2 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0916%1 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0613%1 Oct →
cache13–1-0.059%30 Sept →
dust25–12-0.0838%30 Sept →
anubis13–90.0116%30 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0314%30 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0529%30 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.0023%30 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0023%30 Sept →
anubis8–130.0416%26 Sept →
anubis13–60.0425%25 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0014%25 Sept →
inferno7–90.0130%25 Sept →
vertigo13–100.0739%23 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0427%21 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0129%21 Sept →
mirage13–90.0028%18 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0226%18 Sept →
anubis0–60.0415%18 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0322%18 Sept →
mirage0–13-0.0418%14 Sept →
dust215–150.0119%11 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0621%11 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0516%10 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0025%10 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0423%9 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0727%9 Sept →
nuke13–110.0524%9 Sept →
dust216–14-0.0321%9 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0426%9 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0917%8 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0325%8 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0525%8 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0725%8 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0422%8 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0130%8 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0420%8 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0815%8 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0110%8 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0117%8 Sept →
mirage13–110.0627%7 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.029%7 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0031%7 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0433%7 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0422%7 Sept →
mirage13–100.0144%7 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0933%7 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0315%7 Sept →
vertigo13–4-0.0324%7 Sept →
office8–13-0.0138%7 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0325%6 Sept →
cache6–130.0150%6 Sept →
ancient16–12-0.0717%6 Sept →
cache6–13-0.0624%6 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0122%6 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0324%4 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0138%3 Sept →
mirage13–10.1324%3 Sept →
vertigo13–90.0533%3 Sept →
mirage5–130.0137%3 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.