SonicZitrone

SonicZitrone — CS2 Stats

GT76561198203842337[U:1:243576609]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

769Tracked matches60%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingAll-Rounder
Premier CS Rating22,318Top 50% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#46255 of 223827 tracked
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 769 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 21 days played since 13 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,318 +769 13 Jul13 Sept · 8 days played
21,54922,318peak 22,31813 Jul13 Sept
22,318Peak Premier in tracked matches
21Days played since 2026-07-13

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 22,318
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 2,682 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-08
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-08

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSonicZitroneFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER22,318 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim43
Positioning53
Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY6040Last 10060%Win rateWWWLLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +1.1pp headshot accuracy · +24ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 601ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 596ms

Last 20

  • 137 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-RounderNo style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim4.3
Utility5.2
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch5.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 71% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 567ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.3
Positioning5.3
Utility5.2
Mechanics4.1
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time565ms−22ms
first ⅓ avg 586ms → last ⅓ avg 565ms
Headshot accuracy17.8%+3.8%
first ⅓ avg 14.0% → last ⅓ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–4 · ancient, 16 Jul
35%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · mirage, 24 Jul
375msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · shelter, 27 Jul
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 20 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W3Current streak
67In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 70% over 23mirageWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientS30201067%0.01
anubisS2316770%-0.01
nukeA2213959%0.00
dust2A74357%-0.02
cacheB63350%0.01
mirageD62433%-0.00
fachwerk2020%0.03
shelter110100%-0.08
overpass1010%-0.05
vertigo110100%0.07
inferno1010%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

155Matches
59%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
78.4ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient3266%1.0313.2
Anubis2268%1.0412.8
Nuke2060%1.0815.1
Dust2850%0.8613.5
Mirage729%1.2915.4
Cache560%1.2020.2
Inferno10%1.7326.0
Vertigo1100%1.009.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.4%Headshot accuracy
26.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.0%Spray accuracy
68.5%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
567msReaction time
27.9%T opening success
54.3%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
2.1%Flash assists
11.70HE damage / grenade
7.84Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.8986% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–7-0.0222%3 Aug
ancient13–6-0.0417%2 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0123%31 Jul
anubis8–130.0122%30 Jul
nuke1–13-0.0621%30 Jul
ancient13–5-0.0214%30 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0129%30 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0214%30 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0420%29 Jul
ancient9–13-0.049%29 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0514%29 Jul
ancient13–4-0.0114%28 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0424%28 Jul
nuke13–8-0.0433%28 Jul
ancient13–50.0511%27 Jul
ancient16–13-0.018%27 Jul
cache10–13-0.0520%27 Jul
anubis13–30.0117%27 Jul
shelter13–11-0.0819%27 Jul
ancient13–60.0219%26 Jul
anubis16–120.0325%26 Jul
ancient13–160.0315%26 Jul
anubis13–10-0.017%26 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0418%26 Jul
overpass3–13-0.0518%25 Jul
fachwerk6–130.0315%25 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0614%24 Jul
nuke13–70.0815%24 Jul
nuke13–70.0613%24 Jul
ancient8–130.0715%24 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0135%24 Jul
anubis16–13-0.019%24 Jul
cache13–90.0720%24 Jul
anubis11–130.025%23 Jul
mirage19–220.0114%23 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0316%23 Jul
ancient13–90.0318%23 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0413%23 Jul
dust213–16-0.0513%23 Jul
cache19–150.0117%23 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0513%22 Jul
ancient8–130.0217%22 Jul
anubis13–30.0918%22 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0424%22 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0310%22 Jul
dust26–13-0.0318%22 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0221%22 Jul
nuke13–50.0212%21 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0315%21 Jul
nuke13–80.0919%21 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0228%21 Jul
nuke13–80.0324%20 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0217%20 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0216%20 Jul
nuke13–00.0626%20 Jul
nuke16–13-0.0113%20 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0519%19 Jul
ancient13–5-0.0214%19 Jul
dust213–10-0.0222%19 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0317%19 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0016%19 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0212%19 Jul
ancient13–50.078%18 Jul
cache14–160.0217%18 Jul
anubis13–70.0016%18 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0016%18 Jul
ancient13–40.0827%18 Jul
dust213–9-0.0118%17 Jul
nuke14–160.0511%17 Jul
ancient13–110.0314%17 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0313%17 Jul
dust213–5-0.0015%17 Jul
nuke13–110.0111%16 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0613%16 Jul
anubis13–10.0920%16 Jul
vertigo13–80.0716%16 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0413%16 Jul
ancient13–40.1010%16 Jul
cache13–60.0613%16 Jul
ancient13–60.0615%16 Jul
mirage13–0-0.039%15 Jul
ancient13–80.0310%15 Jul
nuke9–13-0.069%15 Jul
anubis13–40.019%15 Jul
anubis13–2-0.0415%15 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0913%15 Jul
nuke2–130.0114%15 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0315%14 Jul
fachwerk11–130.0314%14 Jul
mirage13–20.0715%14 Jul
dust211–13-0.0315%14 Jul
anubis6–130.0614%14 Jul
nuke13–70.0718%14 Jul
ancient13–60.0420%14 Jul
ancient13–50.0420%13 Jul
anubis12–0-0.036%13 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0110%13 Jul
inferno9–130.0422%13 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0919%13 Jul
cache4–13-0.0516%13 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →