waka

waka — CS2 Stats

76561198202510481[U:1:242244753]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,021Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (23 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,021 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

24Days played since 2024-02-13

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGwakaFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning47
Utility76

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT50–50Last 10050%Win rateWWWWWWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +2.3pp headshot accuracy · +40ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 491ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.9 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility7.6
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels1.9

High utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 76 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.1° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 38% on CT to 6% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning4.7
Utility7.6
Mechanics6.3
Opening Duels0.9
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time536ms−35ms
first ⅓ avg 572ms → last ⅓ avg 536ms
Headshot accuracy21.4%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 20.8% → last ⅓ avg 21.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–2 · nuke, 13 Feb →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · ancient, 9 Mar →
375msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · ancient, 20 Feb →
11–0Biggest win · vertigo, 23 Feb →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W7Current streak
9–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 60% over 15overpassWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2615–1158%0.00
mirageC2410–1442%-0.02
vertigoA159–660%0.01
nukeB137–654%-0.00
anubisB126–650%-0.01
overpassD62–433%-0.02
inferno—41–325%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,019Matches
52%Win rate
1.11Avg K/D
—ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win
—1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient9353%1.0214.8
Mirage6849%1.0515.3
Vertigo6062%1.1315.9
Nuke5355%1.1717.4
Anubis3554%1.1114.9
Inferno2450%1.2216.9
Overpass1947%1.1117.3
Dust21100%0.8012.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.6%Headshot accuracy
35.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.8%Spray accuracy
78.3%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
534msReaction time
6.2%T opening success
37.5%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
10.22HE damage / grenade
15.17Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 6.1984% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategy →Overpass grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–11-0.0727%23 Apr →
ancient13–30.0421%18 Apr →
nuke13–11-0.0520%16 Apr →
nuke13–100.0630%11 Apr →
overpass13–110.0130%10 Mar →
nuke13–70.0428%10 Mar →
vertigo13–10-0.0217%10 Mar →
mirage5–13-0.0711%10 Mar →
mirage11–13-0.0416%10 Mar →
ancient9–13-0.0140%9 Mar →
ancient9–130.1014%9 Mar →
anubis10–130.0121%9 Mar →
nuke2–13-0.0726%8 Mar →
nuke16–130.0425%8 Mar →
anubis13–11-0.0635%8 Mar →
mirage13–70.0427%7 Mar →
anubis10–13-0.0915%7 Mar →
ancient13–16-0.0425%6 Mar →
vertigo11–130.019%6 Mar →
ancient13–10-0.0119%6 Mar →
nuke13–100.0312%6 Mar →
overpass17–19-0.0323%5 Mar →
mirage11–130.0013%5 Mar →
anubis3–13-0.0923%5 Mar →
overpass3–130.0020%5 Mar →
ancient13–8-0.0420%5 Mar →
mirage6–13-0.0622%5 Mar →
inferno7–130.0111%27 Feb →
nuke0–3-0.1410%26 Feb →
vertigo13–110.0126%26 Feb →
vertigo13–160.0713%24 Feb →
overpass13–9-0.0136%24 Feb →
vertigo9–13-0.0323%23 Feb →
anubis6–13-0.0119%23 Feb →
vertigo11–00.0833%23 Feb →
inferno2–130.0231%23 Feb →
anubis9–130.0238%23 Feb →
vertigo6–13-0.0813%23 Feb →
vertigo16–130.0010%23 Feb →
ancient6–130.0126%22 Feb →
nuke6–13-0.0625%22 Feb →
vertigo16–130.0220%22 Feb →
mirage13–9-0.047%22 Feb →
vertigo13–70.0122%22 Feb →
mirage5–13-0.0916%22 Feb →
nuke13–7-0.0011%21 Feb →
vertigo13–110.0027%21 Feb →
overpass13–16-0.0621%21 Feb →
anubis13–110.0232%21 Feb →
nuke11–13-0.0116%21 Feb →
anubis6–13-0.0112%21 Feb →
ancient5–13-0.0822%20 Feb →
ancient13–8-0.0321%20 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.0626%20 Feb →
mirage10–13-0.0718%20 Feb →
ancient13–9-0.0231%19 Feb →
ancient13–10-0.0121%19 Feb →
ancient13–8-0.0414%19 Feb →
ancient17–19-0.0216%19 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.0523%19 Feb →
vertigo6–130.0222%19 Feb →
mirage11–130.0818%19 Feb →
mirage13–10-0.0519%19 Feb →
mirage6–13-0.0816%18 Feb →
ancient11–13-0.0513%17 Feb →
mirage6–13-0.0126%17 Feb →
vertigo13–100.0026%16 Feb →
anubis13–11-0.0520%16 Feb →
anubis13–50.0221%16 Feb →
mirage13–80.0223%16 Feb →
vertigo14–16-0.0115%16 Feb →
mirage13–10-0.0913%16 Feb →
anubis13–100.0726%16 Feb →
ancient8–130.1324%16 Feb →
mirage13–9-0.0214%16 Feb →
ancient13–100.0815%16 Feb →
anubis13–90.0220%16 Feb →
mirage2–13-0.0026%16 Feb →
nuke9–13-0.0510%15 Feb →
ancient5–13-0.0227%15 Feb →
ancient13–3-0.004%15 Feb →
inferno8–13-0.0113%15 Feb →
ancient9–13-0.1039%15 Feb →
ancient11–130.0216%15 Feb →
overpass6–13-0.0417%14 Feb →
mirage19–160.0926%14 Feb →
vertigo13–100.0219%14 Feb →
mirage13–110.0622%14 Feb →
mirage13–80.018%14 Feb →
ancient13–60.0526%14 Feb →
ancient13–70.0816%14 Feb →
nuke8–130.0313%14 Feb →
mirage11–130.0324%13 Feb →
ancient13–8-0.0114%13 Feb →
mirage6–13-0.0430%13 Feb →
ancient13–70.0119%13 Feb →
nuke13–20.1438%13 Feb →
mirage13–60.0028%13 Feb →
ancient13–60.0133%13 Feb →
ancient13–5-0.0326%13 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.