luxi.

luxi. — CS2 Stats

YT76561198201418402[U:1:241152674]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,049Tracked matches56%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,508Top 50% of 180,525 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~10.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#82075 of 226493 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,227 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSupreme Master First Class
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Sep 2026 (14 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 45 days played since 13 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,508 +3,380 21 May4 Sept · 17 days played
14,99919,508peak 19,50821 May4 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,227 +0 1 Sept3 Sept · 2 observations
1,2271,227peak 1,2271 Sept3 Sept
19,508Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,227Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
45Days played since 2026-05-13

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,227
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 124 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 19,508
  • +977 over 30 days · improving
  • +3,338 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 492 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGluxi.FACEITLevel 6 · 1,227 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER19,508 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,227csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning41
Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY494011Last 10049%Win rateLLWWLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −2.0pp headshot accuracy · −57ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 11%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 550ms

Last 20

  • 1082 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 579ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.8 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility3.9
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels1.5
Clutch3.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

sh1ro

Plays most like sh1ro 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning4.1
Utility3.9
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels0.4
Win Impact6.9

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time588ms−37ms
first ⅓ avg 625ms → last ⅓ avg 588ms
Headshot accuracy16.1%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 15.3% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–9 · cache, 20 May
31%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · mirage, 2 Jun
375msFastest reaction time · 9–6 · inferno, 23 Aug
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 9 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
36In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 80% over 5nukeWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD30102033%-0.02
anubisA1810856%0.00
ancientS1611569%-0.01
cacheB84450%0.01
nukeD61517%-0.05
infernoS54180%-0.01
vertigo42250%-0.03
office31233%-0.07
train31233%0.02
dust231233%-0.00
overpass330100%-0.02
shelter110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

343Matches
51%Win rate
0.78Avg K/D
67.5ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
14%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage10055%0.8212.9
Anubis7864%0.8713.2
Ancient6846%0.7713.4
Nuke2050%0.6911.4
Dust21323%0.6610.8
Cache1040%0.9011.5
Overpass850%0.8113.3
Inferno20%0.6110.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.2%Headshot accuracy
35.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.6%Spray accuracy
74.6%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
579msReaction time
23.5%T opening success
33.5%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
2.8%Flash assists
6.48HE damage / grenade
3.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.3918 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.5333% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage7–13-0.0611%9 Sept
office5–13-0.077%8 Sept
anubis13–30.0016%4 Sept
ancient13–80.019%4 Sept
office8–13-0.0610%4 Sept
anubis13–90.0319%3 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0423%27 Aug
inferno9–60.0315%23 Aug
ancient22–180.0117%22 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0316%21 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0123%19 Aug
cache13–10-0.0710%19 Aug
office13–11-0.0711%19 Aug
train13–10.0322%18 Aug
ancient6–130.0119%18 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0412%17 Aug
ancient12–12-0.0815%5 Aug
nuke1–13-0.0620%5 Aug
dust213–9-0.0118%5 Aug
vertigo12–12-0.0516%5 Aug
cache9–13-0.0317%2 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0811%1 Aug
vertigo12–12-0.0215%31 Jul
mirage13–70.0222%31 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0323%30 Jul
nuke13–5-0.0121%30 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0227%28 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0116%28 Jul
shelter13–70.0117%28 Jul
vertigo13–100.0310%28 Jul
train9–13-0.0117%28 Jul
overpass13–9-0.0217%26 Jul
mirage12–12-0.0012%26 Jul
cache13–40.0713%26 Jul
anubis13–60.0216%26 Jul
mirage2–13-0.058%26 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0410%26 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0516%25 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0611%24 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0113%22 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0322%22 Jul
anubis13–160.0314%21 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0016%21 Jul
mirage10–130.0214%20 Jul
anubis13–20.0314%20 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0917%20 Jul
mirage13–60.0110%20 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0313%20 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0414%20 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0819%15 Jul
ancient13–10-0.0123%15 Jul
ancient22–19-0.0220%12 Jul
mirage6–130.0016%12 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0410%10 Jul
cache2–13-0.0614%10 Jul
ancient13–00.0520%9 Jul
cache13–20.1020%9 Jul
mirage15–150.048%9 Jul
mirage2–13-0.080%5 Jul
cache12–12-0.0512%5 Jul
anubis10–130.0018%4 Jul
overpass13–4-0.0024%4 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0221%4 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0114%4 Jul
ancient13–90.0223%4 Jul
mirage13–30.0217%4 Jul
anubis13–40.0614%3 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0212%3 Jul
cache12–12-0.0314%2 Jul
mirage7–13-0.1111%2 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0211%2 Jul
mirage13–70.0919%30 Jun
ancient10–20.0715%30 Jun
anubis5–13-0.059%25 Jun
mirage10–130.0314%25 Jun
vertigo9–6-0.099%5 Jun
inferno8–8-0.0211%5 Jun
anubis11–13-0.0120%5 Jun
mirage12–12-0.0418%3 Jun
anubis12–12-0.0110%3 Jun
mirage7–13-0.1031%2 Jun
anubis11–13-0.036%2 Jun
anubis13–50.0115%29 May
ancient13–11-0.0615%26 May
inferno9–50.0018%26 May
mirage13–80.0317%24 May
nuke10–13-0.0423%24 May
mirage13–7-0.055%23 May
overpass13–10-0.0414%23 May
mirage8–130.0413%23 May
ancient7–130.0117%22 May
inferno13–7-0.0316%21 May
dust212–12-0.0118%21 May
ancient13–110.0114%21 May
anubis13–90.1012%21 May
dust29–130.0230%20 May
cache13–90.1222%20 May
train11–130.0513%16 May
mirage11–130.0324%16 May
nuke1–13-0.0510%13 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →