gerald fitzgerald

gerald fitzgerald — CS2 Stats

ME76561198199391006[U:1:239125278]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

183Tracked matches32%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingPositional Player
Ladder ranks via Leetify
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. Today is the first observation — history builds from here and cannot be backfilled. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning51
Utility4

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD39529Last 10039%Win rateLLLLLWLLLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +5.6pp headshot accuracy · +62ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 05 · 0% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 744ms

Last 10

  • 181 · 10% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 710ms

Last 20

  • 4124 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 679ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility0.4
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels3.2

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 660ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning5.1
Utility0.4
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time662ms−109ms
first ⅓ avg 771ms → last ⅓ avg 662ms
Headshot accuracy24.2%+4.7%
first ⅓ avg 19.6% → last ⅓ avg 24.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 11–13 · office, 31 May
50%Best headshot accuracy · 3–1 · office, 11 Jul
406msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · office, 3 Jun
13–1Biggest win · office, 3 Apr

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L5Current streak
76In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 60% over 5officeWeakest map · 34% over 62
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
officeD62214134%-0.00
nukeA148657%-0.01
dust2A53260%-0.00
mirage31233%-0.06
ancient31233%-0.01
cache220100%0.05
vertigo2020%-0.07
inferno2020%-0.10
anubis1010%-0.03
warden1010%-0.14
alpine1010%-0.05
train110100%-0.12
overpass110100%-0.02
grail1010%-0.08
jura110100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.2%Headshot accuracy
36.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.0%Spray accuracy
85.6%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
660msReaction time
24.2%T opening success
44.8%CT opening success
0.04Enemies flashed / flash
0.0%Flash assists
1.28HE damage / grenade
0.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.0385 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.1818% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office10–13-0.0527%19 Jul
office8–13-0.0728%19 Jul
office5–130.0334%12 Jul
office5–13-0.0917%11 Jul
office8–130.0222%11 Jul
office3–1-0.0150%11 Jul
office5–130.0424%28 Jun
office9–130.0520%28 Jun
office8–13-0.0914%27 Jun
office12–120.0521%14 Jun
office13–10-0.0213%14 Jun
office13–20.0033%14 Jun
office12–12-0.0021%13 Jun
office12–12-0.0424%13 Jun
office8–13-0.0318%13 Jun
office11–130.0514%12 Jun
office12–120.0526%12 Jun
office4–13-0.0410%11 Jun
office13–80.0316%7 Jun
office9–13-0.0124%5 Jun
office13–60.0829%4 Jun
office13–50.0725%4 Jun
office7–130.1021%4 Jun
office6–13-0.0316%3 Jun
office5–13-0.0823%3 Jun
office8–20.0526%3 Jun
office9–130.0520%3 Jun
office13–7-0.0026%3 Jun
office10–13-0.0529%2 Jun
office12–120.0548%2 Jun
office13–60.1030%2 Jun
office13–110.0125%1 Jun
office12–120.0025%1 Jun
office11–130.1228%31 May
office9–130.0330%31 May
office12–12-0.0319%31 May
office4–130.0115%28 May
office8–13-0.0420%25 May
office7–13-0.0425%25 May
nuke13–80.0419%3 May
mirage10–13-0.0116%3 May
cache13–60.0624%3 May
cache13–80.0517%2 May
office13–110.0818%26 Apr
office8–130.0512%26 Apr
office11–130.0111%9 Apr
office13–11-0.0316%9 Apr
office0–8-0.0913%9 Apr
office6–13-0.0118%4 Apr
office2–13-0.0615%4 Apr
vertigo6–13-0.0616%4 Apr
office13–10.1128%3 Apr
office9–13-0.1127%3 Apr
office13–60.0521%3 Apr
office13–11-0.0524%3 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0323%3 Apr
nuke13–40.0115%3 Apr
office7–13-0.0715%19 Mar
office9–13-0.1325%19 Mar
nuke13–5-0.083%13 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0015%13 Mar
nuke13–110.0319%12 Mar
nuke13–9-0.0620%11 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0716%11 Mar
nuke11–130.0316%11 Mar
warden6–13-0.1438%11 Mar
alpine10–13-0.0517%11 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0532%10 Mar
office13–10-0.0327%10 Mar
office11–13-0.0421%10 Mar
nuke12–12-0.0517%10 Mar
nuke10–13-0.0614%10 Mar
office12–12-0.0337%7 Mar
office13–11-0.0331%7 Mar
nuke11–7-0.0328%22 Feb
nuke9–13-0.0121%19 Feb
nuke7–13-0.075%19 Feb
office8–13-0.0511%4 Oct
mirage5–13-0.0529%4 Oct
ancient10–130.0123%3 Oct
office13–10-0.0530%1 Oct
train13–9-0.1213%29 Sept
dust24–130.0626%29 Sept
overpass13–9-0.0221%25 Sept
dust26–13-0.0241%25 Sept
inferno6–13-0.1314%20 Sept
dust213–7-0.0314%20 Sept
dust213–100.0525%20 Sept
nuke13–60.0923%18 Sept
mirage13–3-0.1010%17 Sept
ancient13–2-0.020%17 Sept
nuke13–20.0222%16 Sept
grail9–13-0.0810%16 Sept
vertigo7–13-0.088%16 Sept
office9–13-0.0814%16 Sept
office13–9-0.057%15 Sept
office13–10.0620%15 Sept
jura13–90.0221%13 Sept
office13–100.0514%13 Sept
dust213–8-0.0720%13 Sept

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →