Zinverino

Zinverino — CS2 Stats

GB76561198199366047[U:1:239100319]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

291Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating10,852Blue band · top ~50.4% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Sep 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 291 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 23 days played since 26 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 10,852 +1,723 26 Jul10 Sept · 15 days played
9,12911,990peak 11,99026 Jul10 Sept
12,117Peak Premier in tracked matches
23Days played since 2026-07-26

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,138 below peak (11,990)
  • +373 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 4,148 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-08
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-09-08

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGZinverinoFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER10,852 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim74
Positioning54
Utility33

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD51463Last 10051%Win rateLLLLWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +4.9pp headshot accuracy · +73ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.02), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 628ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 663ms

Last 20

  • 812 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 627ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim7.4
Utility3.3
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels3.3

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 617ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.4
Positioning5.4
Utility3.3
Mechanics7.8
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time622ms−34ms
first ⅓ avg 656ms → last ⅓ avg 622ms
Headshot accuracy17.1%−2.6%
first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 17.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–6 · ancient, 28 Jul
45%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · inferno, 2 Sept
469msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · nuke, 29 Aug
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 28 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L4Current streak
76In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 88% over 8dust2Weakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB31161552%0.00
nukeB158753%-0.00
cacheA148657%-0.03
infernoB126650%-0.01
anubisC114736%-0.02
dust2D82625%-0.01
ancientS87188%0.02
fachwerk1010%-0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.9%Headshot accuracy
37.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.9%Spray accuracy
85.0%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
617msReaction time
23.8%T opening success
53.7%CT opening success
0.30Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
10.06HE damage / grenade
3.77Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3041 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.7965% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis6–13-0.0224%8 Sept
dust23–90.0218%7 Sept
mirage6–13-0.0024%7 Sept
anubis4–130.0313%7 Sept
nuke13–4-0.0210%7 Sept
cache11–13-0.0511%7 Sept
inferno13–30.0445%2 Sept
anubis13–50.0720%2 Sept
mirage9–130.0316%2 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0221%2 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0310%2 Sept
anubis3–13-0.074%1 Sept
anubis2–130.0413%1 Sept
ancient16–13-0.0024%29 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0124%29 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0115%29 Aug
cache13–6-0.0112%29 Aug
nuke13–110.019%29 Aug
dust211–13-0.0216%29 Aug
dust27–13-0.0525%29 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0211%29 Aug
cache13–6-0.0431%28 Aug
nuke13–40.0016%28 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0613%28 Aug
nuke12–120.0111%28 Aug
mirage13–20.1013%28 Aug
cache13–8-0.0718%28 Aug
inferno13–50.0613%28 Aug
cache13–9-0.0311%27 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0320%27 Aug
ancient13–110.0119%27 Aug
cache11–130.0419%27 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0317%27 Aug
nuke5–130.0514%27 Aug
dust213–40.1115%27 Aug
mirage12–3-0.0121%27 Aug
inferno16–13-0.0111%27 Aug
cache2–13-0.0528%26 Aug
mirage4–130.0223%26 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0724%26 Aug
inferno2–13-0.047%25 Aug
dust213–20.0123%25 Aug
mirage12–120.0223%25 Aug
cache13–5-0.0724%25 Aug
anubis4–130.0620%25 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0524%25 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0115%24 Aug
dust22–13-0.0723%24 Aug
fachwerk2–13-0.1130%23 Aug
dust28–13-0.0615%23 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0222%23 Aug
cache13–6-0.0113%23 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0414%23 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0423%21 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0517%20 Aug
mirage13–40.0725%17 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0914%16 Aug
mirage11–60.0216%16 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0327%16 Aug
anubis10–13-0.107%16 Aug
cache8–13-0.078%15 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0125%9 Aug
inferno13–90.0016%9 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0112%1 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0629%1 Aug
anubis12–12-0.0512%1 Aug
cache13–3-0.028%1 Aug
mirage13–30.029%1 Aug
nuke5–130.0322%1 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0617%1 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0915%1 Aug
cache6–13-0.0124%31 Jul
nuke13–9-0.0121%31 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0620%31 Jul
inferno13–80.0725%31 Jul
ancient1–13-0.0511%30 Jul
mirage3–13-0.056%30 Jul
mirage13–30.0229%29 Jul
mirage13–70.0427%29 Jul
cache13–6-0.0713%28 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0218%28 Jul
nuke13–40.0536%28 Jul
mirage13–110.0522%28 Jul
nuke10–130.0221%28 Jul
mirage13–70.027%28 Jul
ancient13–60.1533%28 Jul
dust211–13-0.0326%28 Jul
mirage7–130.0013%28 Jul
inferno2–130.0120%28 Jul
mirage13–10.0415%28 Jul
mirage10–130.0321%28 Jul
anubis13–4-0.0327%26 Jul
ancient16–140.0811%26 Jul
mirage13–60.0226%26 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0417%26 Jul
nuke16–140.0025%26 Jul
cache10–130.0115%26 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0517%26 Jul
ancient13–80.0317%26 Jul
ancient13–5-0.0425%26 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →