Division Bell

Division Bell — CS2 Stats

76561198199243387[U:1:238977659]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,866Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.8 StrongSupport
FaceitLevel 10 · 3,630 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 23 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 3,630 → 3,630
+2Tracked matches · now 1,866
0.0ppWin rate · 56.7% → 56.7%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 32 days played since 9 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 3,630 +0 29 Aug – 23 Sept · 5 observations
3,6303,630peak 3,63029 Aug23 Sept
3,630Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-01-09

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 3,630
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: 4,000 ELO at 4,000 — 370 to go
  • Reached: 3,500 ELO · 3,000 ELO · 2,500 ELO · Level 10
  • 3,500 ELO first seen 2026-08-29
  • 3,000 ELO first seen 2026-08-29

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDivision BellFACEITLevel 10 · 3,630 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of ranked30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO3,630csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim96
Positioning62
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY57–42–1Last 10057%Win rateWWWLLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.0pp headshot accuracy · +67ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 517ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 487ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 30%
  • Avg reaction 454ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim9.6
Utility7.0
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 96 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 55% on CT to 36% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.6
Positioning6.2
Utility7.0
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact7.2

Composite 7.8/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time483ms−39ms
first ⅓ avg 522ms → last ⅓ avg 483ms
Headshot accuracy29.7%−3.2%
first ⅓ avg 32.9% → last ⅓ avg 29.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.22Best match rating · 13–11 · mirage, 14 Jan →
73%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · dust2, 22 Jun →
313msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · ancient, 25 Jun →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 23 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
10–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 70% over 23nukeWeakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA2716–1159%0.03
dust2A2415–963%0.02
ancientS2316–770%0.01
infernoB84–450%0.00
overpassC83–538%0.00
nukeD82–625%-0.00
anubis—10–10%-0.10
train—11–0100%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,212Matches
58%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
80.3ADR
57%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
14Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage64361%1.2216.7
Ancient36662%1.2716.2
Dust225558%1.2015.8
Nuke10058%1.1115.6
Inferno6769%1.2215.7
Overpass5161%1.1515.9
Train3861%1.4216.6
Anubis2748%1.0715.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

30.7%Headshot accuracy
40.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.3%Spray accuracy
85.3%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
478msReaction time
35.9%T opening success
54.7%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
9.7%Flash assists
10.02HE damage / grenade
14.92Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 35.8748% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–100.0838%15 Sept →
mirage13–110.0435%15 Sept →
ancient13–100.0634%9 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.0128%8 Sept →
inferno6–130.0424%8 Sept →
anubis1–13-0.1027%3 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0733%3 Sept →
ancient13–160.0132%31 Aug →
mirage13–50.0418%26 Jul →
dust213–80.0533%26 Jul →
ancient6–13-0.1032%26 Jul →
ancient13–100.0038%25 Jul →
mirage13–10.0444%25 Jul →
ancient11–130.000%25 Jul →
ancient13–80.0429%25 Jul →
inferno13–110.0524%25 Jul →
dust213–90.0720%25 Jul →
mirage14–16-0.0228%25 Jun →
dust28–13-0.0142%25 Jun →
inferno19–170.0234%25 Jun →
ancient6–13-0.0431%25 Jun →
dust213–70.0221%25 Jun →
overpass14–160.0132%25 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.0118%25 Jun →
dust213–100.034%25 Jun →
ancient13–80.0439%25 Jun →
dust213–80.0473%22 Jun →
mirage9–13-0.0312%23 Apr →
dust213–00.0636%23 Apr →
mirage13–10.0133%22 Apr →
mirage13–90.0529%22 Apr →
ancient13–100.0723%22 Apr →
mirage13–30.0136%21 Apr →
mirage13–160.0235%15 Mar →
nuke9–13-0.0133%15 Mar →
mirage6–13-0.0028%15 Mar →
dust29–13-0.0125%14 Mar →
nuke4–13-0.0030%14 Mar →
overpass12–12-0.0518%12 Mar →
dust213–40.0454%12 Mar →
nuke13–80.0038%12 Mar →
mirage8–13-0.0526%12 Mar →
inferno13–9-0.029%11 Mar →
ancient13–70.0421%11 Mar →
nuke13–80.0535%10 Mar →
ancient13–100.0733%10 Mar →
overpass9–13-0.0231%9 Mar →
inferno9–13-0.0125%9 Mar →
ancient13–90.0115%9 Mar →
mirage13–6-0.0317%7 Mar →
ancient10–13-0.0524%7 Mar →
dust216–12-0.0339%7 Mar →
ancient13–90.0628%6 Mar →
nuke7–13-0.0323%6 Mar →
mirage13–7-0.0120%6 Mar →
dust213–11-0.0320%5 Mar →
mirage13–50.0143%5 Mar →
nuke14–16-0.0135%5 Mar →
dust213–5-0.0338%5 Mar →
ancient13–10-0.0724%5 Mar →
nuke4–13-0.0229%5 Mar →
ancient13–100.0127%3 Mar →
mirage3–13-0.0228%3 Mar →
dust26–13-0.0119%3 Mar →
mirage13–90.0632%2 Mar →
ancient13–50.0115%2 Mar →
dust26–13-0.0533%2 Mar →
inferno10–13-0.0455%2 Mar →
mirage16–190.0433%27 Feb →
dust213–50.0121%27 Feb →
dust20–13-0.0920%27 Feb →
overpass13–8-0.0617%27 Feb →
ancient13–110.0027%27 Feb →
ancient13–40.0721%26 Feb →
mirage8–13-0.0142%26 Feb →
dust213–70.0329%26 Feb →
mirage13–6-0.0133%22 Feb →
overpass7–13-0.0319%22 Feb →
ancient13–100.1019%22 Feb →
dust29–13-0.0430%22 Feb →
nuke8–130.0125%22 Feb →
mirage16–13-0.0126%31 Jan →
mirage13–2-0.0144%30 Jan →
ancient10–13-0.0626%27 Jan →
dust25–30.0144%27 Jan →
dust26–100.0124%27 Jan →
inferno19–170.0028%27 Jan →
overpass13–100.0645%27 Jan →
overpass7–130.0733%27 Jan →
dust21–13-0.0536%27 Jan →
dust25–130.0957%14 Jan →
mirage13–60.2129%14 Jan →
mirage13–110.2248%14 Jan →
mirage11–130.1260%12 Jan →
overpass13–110.0432%12 Jan →
mirage11–130.0724%12 Jan →
train13–30.0835%12 Jan →
ancient7–20.0633%12 Jan →
dust213–110.1331%12 Jan →
dust213–40.2039%9 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 103K ELO Club1,000 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →