T0SCHKA

T0SCHKA — CS2 Stats

76561198196648827[U:1:236383099]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

885Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating19,999Purple band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#19494 of 49876 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGT0SCHKAFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER19,999 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning48
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT40555Last 10040%Win rateWWLLWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim9.0
Aggression5.1
Utility5.1
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels3.0
Clutch0.4

Sharp aimerExcellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Counter-strafing. 92% of shots taken properly stopped — movement discipline most players never reach.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 43 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 60% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 618ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning4.8
Utility5.1
Mechanics9.3
Opening Duels3.7
Win Impact2.8

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time618ms−76ms
first ⅓ avg 695ms → last ⅓ avg 618ms
Headshot accuracy28.4%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 28.5% → last ⅓ avg 28.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — inferno 12–12
131Biggest win — cache
4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
98In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 47% over 17mirageWeakest map · 35% over 26
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2691735%0.01
dust2C2591636%-0.00
cacheB178947%-0.00
infernoC167944%0.02
nukeC52340%-0.04
ancient42250%-0.02
anubis220100%0.01
vertigo1010%-0.13
office1010%-0.10
overpass110100%0.03
poseidon1010%-0.01
sanctum1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 26). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

157Matches
55%Win rate
1.28Avg K/D
83.9ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

22%1v1 clutch win
26%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1346%1.1318.7
Dust21233%0.9515.8
Cache967%1.7220.0
Inferno650%1.0616.3
Anubis367%0.7211.7
Ancient367%1.0016.0
Overpass250%1.0618.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.6%Headshot accuracy
36.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.2%Spray accuracy
92.0%Counter-strafing
7.9°Preaim
618msReaction time
24.6%T opening success
59.7%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
10.6%Flash assists
8.11HE damage / grenade
6.27Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.6118% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 26 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–30.0150%27 Aug
dust213–110.0020%26 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0023%26 Aug
cache8–13-0.0340%15 Aug
cache13–80.0329%15 Aug
dust213–110.0130%15 Aug
cache8–13-0.0436%13 Aug
mirage16–120.0127%10 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0333%10 Aug
inferno13–110.0139%9 Aug
mirage11–130.0230%9 Aug
dust25–13-0.0343%9 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0220%9 Aug
dust213–100.0528%6 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0220%6 Aug
inferno16–130.0241%5 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0022%5 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0122%4 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0322%4 Aug
dust26–13-0.0625%2 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0027%2 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0133%2 Aug
mirage13–70.1329%2 Aug
mirage12–160.0141%26 Jul
dust28–13-0.0517%26 Jul
ancient13–50.0326%26 Jul
dust214–16-0.0517%25 Jul
mirage8–130.1322%25 Jul
dust23–13-0.0217%23 Jul
cache8–130.0332%23 Jul
inferno10–13-0.046%19 Jul
mirage10–130.0625%19 Jul
vertigo7–9-0.1346%19 Jul
cache4–13-0.0021%17 Jul
mirage7–130.0036%17 Jul
dust216–140.0323%17 Jul
dust213–50.0424%16 Jul
mirage11–130.0628%16 Jul
dust24–13-0.0420%15 Jul
ancient13–60.0013%15 Jul
mirage13–30.0938%15 Jul
cache9–13-0.0019%14 Jul
cache13–30.0023%14 Jul
inferno14–160.0329%14 Jul
dust24–130.0226%14 Jul
inferno7–130.0323%14 Jul
dust213–60.0338%14 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0017%14 Jul
mirage13–110.0121%12 Jul
dust21–13-0.0638%12 Jul
cache8–13-0.0130%12 Jul
cache13–9-0.0128%12 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0723%12 Jul
mirage16–13-0.0126%12 Jul
cache13–8-0.0122%12 Jul
dust213–4-0.0330%12 Jul
inferno12–120.1724%12 Jul
mirage12–120.0731%11 Jul
dust26–13-0.0023%11 Jul
inferno9–40.0738%8 Jul
inferno5–90.0325%8 Jul
nuke2–9-0.1927%8 Jul
dust213–60.0423%5 Jul
mirage16–120.0339%5 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0329%5 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0513%5 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0417%4 Jul
ancient14–16-0.0226%4 Jul
dust214–160.1228%4 Jul
inferno8–130.0511%4 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0636%4 Jul
anubis13–110.0121%4 Jul
inferno13–110.0223%3 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0023%3 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0531%2 Jul
dust215–15-0.0219%2 Jul
cache13–10-0.0233%1 Jul
cache5–13-0.0326%1 Jul
cache13–30.1022%1 Jul
dust210–13-0.0623%1 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0310%1 Jul
dust211–130.0140%30 Jun
cache13–80.0429%30 Jun
mirage13–160.0233%30 Jun
dust213–10-0.0123%30 Jun
inferno10–40.0727%30 Jun
mirage13–40.0517%30 Jun
dust215–15-0.0323%29 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0917%29 Jun
dust28–130.0245%28 Jun
dust28–130.0127%28 Jun
office4–13-0.1028%28 Jun
anubis13–110.0138%28 Jun
inferno13–60.0330%28 Jun
overpass13–20.0327%28 Jun
cache13–10.0482%28 Jun
cache8–13-0.0232%27 Jun
cache6–13-0.0740%27 Jun
poseidon6–9-0.0122%27 Jun
sanctum5–9-0.0330%27 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 MatchesAim 90+
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →