Sam — CS2 Stats

US76561198196622679[U:1:236356951]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,837Tracked matches44%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.2 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating26,294Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#1715 of 20332 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 1,760 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim91

Positioning68

Utility65

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–41–6Last 10053%Win rateLWWWLLWTWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim9.1

Aggression9.2

Utility6.5

Positioning6.8

Opening Duels4.7

Clutch3.6

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like donk 97% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 91 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 64% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 563ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.1

Positioning6.8

Utility6.5

Mechanics7.0

Opening Duels4.7

Win Impact3.1

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time556ms−19ms

first ⅓ avg 575ms → last ⅓ avg 556ms

Headshot accuracy21.8%+3.8%

first ⅓ avg 18.1% → last ⅓ avg 21.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — mirage 16–12

13–0Biggest win — nuke

6Longest win streak

12–12In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

13Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 77% over 26ancientWeakest map · 33% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	S	26	20–6	77%	0.01
inferno	C	21	8–13	38%	0.01
nuke	B	19	9–10	47%	0.03
anubis	A	8	5–3	63%	0.03
dust2	C	7	3–4	43%	0.05
ancient	D	6	2–4	33%	0.01
cache	A	5	3–2	60%	0.03
train	—	3	1–2	33%	0.03
office	—	2	1–1	50%	0.08
vertigo	—	2	1–1	50%	0.00
shelter	—	1	0–1	0%	0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

302Matches

57%Win rate

1.12Avg K/D

84.8ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

25%1v2 clutch win

13Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	65	58%	1.27	17.2
Dust2	43	49%	1.09	16.2
Ancient	21	71%	1.35	16.8
Inferno	18	56%	1.35	16.4
Nuke	18	44%	1.04	16.0
Anubis	12	58%	1.13	16.4
Cache	5	40%	1.45	18.2
Train	4	50%	1.57	19.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.6%Headshot accuracy

42.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

46.5%Spray accuracy

81.7%Counter-strafing

8.2°Preaim

563msReaction time

33.1%T opening success

64.4%CT opening success

0.72Enemies flashed / flash

7.0%Flash assists

14.41HE damage / grenade

6.93Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 33.0531% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	5–13	-0.06	19%	28 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.03	14%	28 Aug →
inferno	6–5	0.04	26%	28 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.07	21%	25 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.01	19%	21 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.03	20%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	9%	21 Aug →
inferno	15–15	0.02	15%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.08	28%	18 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.02	13%	18 Aug →
inferno	15–15	0.03	19%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.05	19%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.03	23%	16 Aug →
train	6–13	0.01	9%	16 Aug →
dust2	12–16	-0.03	21%	14 Aug →
train	13–6	0.07	37%	14 Aug →
train	11–13	0.01	18%	14 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.06	17%	12 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.05	34%	11 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.03	29%	11 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.04	16%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.10	24%	9 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.06	31%	9 Aug →
office	12–12	0.06	44%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.07	22%	8 Aug →
dust2	14–16	0.07	22%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–0	0.13	35%	8 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.02	4%	6 Aug →
anubis	6–13	0.09	16%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.06	26%	6 Aug →
inferno	11–13	0.02	27%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–2	-0.05	9%	6 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.01	32%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.01	19%	6 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.08	24%	6 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.07	23%	5 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	21%	5 Aug →
mirage	0–4	-0.03	60%	5 Aug →
mirage	16–14	-0.01	12%	5 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.03	21%	5 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.06	14%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	11%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	30%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–5	-0.03	16%	2 Aug →
inferno	16–13	0.02	22%	2 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.07	19%	1 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.01	28%	1 Aug →
ancient	16–14	0.04	20%	1 Aug →
inferno	3–1	-0.16	0%	1 Aug →
vertigo	13–11	0.04	21%	31 Jul →
vertigo	7–13	-0.03	22%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.06	18%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.04	23%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.01	23%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.00	18%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.03	24%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.01	43%	26 Jul →
inferno	15–15	0.01	16%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–4	-0.03	18%	25 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.03	24%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.03	23%	25 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.06	25%	25 Jul →
nuke	3–13	-0.02	20%	25 Jul →
inferno	12–16	0.06	13%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.01	28%	24 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	33%	24 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.01	16%	24 Jul →
mirage	3–2	-0.01	18%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.05	28%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.02	14%	23 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.06	33%	23 Jul →
anubis	12–3	0.03	6%	22 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.10	23%	22 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.02	17%	22 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.04	14%	19 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.00	8%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.03	30%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.09	17%	18 Jul →
office	13–7	0.10	41%	18 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.06	10%	18 Jul →
inferno	15–15	0.00	13%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.07	17%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.04	8%	18 Jul →
nuke	12–16	0.04	15%	18 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	21%	17 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.00	23%	17 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.09	16%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.02	19%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–11	-0.02	17%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.03	16%	11 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.07	13%	11 Jul →
anubis	0–13	-0.10	27%	11 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.01	15%	11 Jul →
mirage	14–16	0.02	13%	10 Jul →
inferno	5–13	-0.03	24%	10 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.05	27%	10 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.07	14%	10 Jul →
mirage	16–12	0.14	14%	10 Jul →
shelter	12–12	0.07	18%	9 Jul →
nuke	9–13	0.03	8%	9 Jul →