"naeq"

"naeq" — CS2 Stats

PW76561198196525149[U:1:236259421]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,340Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,563 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,340 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 36 days played since 6 May 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 28,186 +2,767 7 May3 Jul · 15 days played
25,29628,186peak 28,1867 May3 Jul
28,186Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,563Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
36Days played since 2026-05-06

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,563
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 188 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-14
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-14

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG"naeq"FACEITLevel 9 · 1,563 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO1,563csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63
Positioning49
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53425Last 10053%Win rateLWLLLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +2.5pp headshot accuracy · +100ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 670ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 658ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 608ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim6.3
Utility7.0
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.3
Clutch4.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 608ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3
Positioning4.9
Utility7.0
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time596ms−10ms
first ⅓ avg 607ms → last ⅓ avg 596ms
Headshot accuracy20.9%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 20.3% → last ⅓ avg 20.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 9–3 · vertigo, 20 May
64%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · dust2, 29 May
383msFastest reaction time · 2–9 · inferno, 15 Jun
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 20 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
62In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 100% over 5ancientWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB40182245%0.01
dust2A2011955%0.01
infernoB136746%0.01
cacheS96367%0.01
ancientD62433%0.01
anubisS550100%0.02
nukeA53260%0.08
vertigo220100%0.21

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

522Matches
52%Win rate
1.41Avg K/D
90.6ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage16462%1.5419.5
Dust26439%1.1216.1
Inferno5549%1.4718.1
Anubis5437%1.3218.6
Ancient3941%1.2617.1
Nuke2050%1.1918.5
Cache944%1.8021.8
Overpass875%1.2517.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.3%Headshot accuracy
31.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.6%Spray accuracy
76.3%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
608msReaction time
24.4%T opening success
50.5%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
10.06HE damage / grenade
19.76Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.3885% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage0–5-0.0250%3 Sept
mirage13–60.0322%3 Sept
dust25–130.0413%3 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0620%2 Sept
dust29–13-0.0311%31 Aug
inferno16–140.0820%31 Aug
ancient3–10-0.0114%10 Aug
cache8–13-0.0425%16 Jul
mirage13–30.0122%16 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0125%16 Jul
ancient1–11-0.110%14 Jul
dust216–13-0.0415%11 Jul
cache16–120.049%10 Jul
ancient13–60.1525%10 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0325%10 Jul
cache13–50.0116%10 Jul
cache13–110.0220%10 Jul
anubis13–50.1025%10 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0114%10 Jul
cache13–50.0348%9 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0017%9 Jul
mirage13–7-0.009%3 Jul
inferno5–00.0556%3 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0119%3 Jul
dust213–16-0.0217%3 Jul
ancient16–140.0621%3 Jul
cache7–00.0425%2 Jul
mirage9–130.0122%2 Jul
dust213–9-0.0837%2 Jul
dust213–40.048%2 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0611%26 Jun
mirage13–20.0514%26 Jun
mirage12–120.0115%20 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0218%20 Jun
mirage13–40.2039%19 Jun
inferno13–30.0825%17 Jun
dust210–130.0221%17 Jun
nuke13–80.1918%17 Jun
inferno2–9-0.0424%15 Jun
mirage5–130.0323%15 Jun
mirage5–10.0145%15 Jun
anubis13–10.0924%4 Jun
inferno11–130.0225%3 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0229%31 May
mirage13–9-0.0320%30 May
dust21–13-0.0564%29 May
mirage13–100.0235%29 May
mirage6–130.0434%29 May
mirage0–13-0.040%29 May
inferno3–13-0.038%28 May
dust215–150.0826%28 May
mirage13–70.0124%28 May
inferno13–110.0216%28 May
dust213–40.0535%25 May
mirage3–13-0.0215%25 May
inferno0–13-0.0929%25 May
mirage7–130.0021%25 May
mirage12–120.029%24 May
mirage13–4-0.0214%23 May
mirage6–13-0.0417%23 May
dust27–13-0.0533%23 May
mirage13–60.0422%23 May
nuke13–90.0329%23 May
inferno13–60.0220%23 May
dust23–10-0.0414%22 May
mirage13–90.0112%22 May
anubis13–7-0.033%22 May
mirage9–130.0626%22 May
dust211–6-0.0546%22 May
vertigo9–30.2325%20 May
mirage12–12-0.0321%20 May
cache13–8-0.0211%20 May
dust213–00.0925%20 May
mirage8–10.0410%20 May
mirage13–11-0.0512%20 May
inferno13–60.0121%20 May
dust216–12-0.0022%20 May
mirage6–130.0231%19 May
mirage11–130.0114%16 May
anubis13–60.0016%16 May
mirage10–13-0.0222%14 May
ancient6–13-0.0324%14 May
nuke6–13-0.0715%14 May
mirage13–110.0723%13 May
mirage0–7-0.0033%13 May
mirage6–130.0319%12 May
dust216–13-0.0216%12 May
mirage10–130.0621%11 May
mirage13–30.0912%8 May
mirage16–13-0.039%8 May
dust213–20.0917%8 May
cache8–13-0.0220%7 May
dust213–100.0516%7 May
cache4–130.0318%7 May
dust23–130.0117%7 May
inferno10–130.0816%7 May
nuke13–80.1519%7 May
dust213–20.0734%7 May
nuke8–80.0917%6 May
vertigo9–40.1817%6 May

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →