Gomeo2

Gomeo2 — CS2 Stats

AZ76561198192434669[U:1:232168941]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

84Tracked matches55%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.4 StrongAll-Rounder
CSDB Leaderboard#44305 of 259887 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,943 +5,310 28 Dec – 8 Jan · 9 days played
17,63324,655peak 24,65528 Dec8 Jan
24,655Peak Premier in tracked matches
41Days played since 2021-12-15

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning70
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–32–4Last 8457%Win rateLWWWLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.8pp headshot accuracy · +15ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 559ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Newest first, from the last 84 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: All-Rounder — No style dimension stands clear of the others in this profile.

Aim8.5
Utility6.8
Positioning7.0
Opening Duels6.9

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 65% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 65% on CT to 45% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning7.0
Utility6.8
Mechanics7.2
Opening Duels6.3
Win Impact6.7

Composite 7.4/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time537ms−39ms
first ⅓ avg 575ms → last ⅓ avg 537ms
Headshot accuracy24.8%−0.4%
first ⅓ avg 25.3% → last ⅓ avg 24.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 84 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.20Best match rating · 13–7 · overpass, 7 Oct →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · ancient, 13 Jan →
406msFastest reaction time · 9–1 · inferno, 17 Jul →
13–0Biggest win · mirage, 28 Dec →

Across the last 84 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
3–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
21Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 64% over 22dust2Weakest map · 43% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2214–864%0.05
mirageB2111–1052%0.04
dust2C146–843%0.06
overpassB105–550%0.03
anubis—43–175%0.04
vertigo—43–175%0.06
ancient—33–0100%0.07
train—32–167%0.03
nuke—21–150%-0.01
palacio—10–10%-0.00

Across the last 84 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.2%Headshot accuracy
36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.9%Spray accuracy
82.4%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
533msReaction time
44.9%T opening success
65.2%CT opening success
0.74Enemies flashed / flash
9.6%Flash assists
12.73HE damage / grenade
14.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust27–13-0.0122%26 Apr →
inferno13–60.0431%26 Apr →
mirage13–70.0225%26 Apr →
ancient13–90.0423%29 Jan →
dust210–130.0627%29 Jan →
dust213–100.1522%24 Jan →
mirage3–130.0235%8 Jan →
overpass13–60.1327%8 Jan →
palacio4–13-0.0018%7 Jan →
dust26–13-0.0125%7 Jan →
mirage12–120.0521%4 Jan →
inferno13–50.1222%4 Jan →
dust213–90.2022%4 Jan →
overpass4–13-0.0025%4 Jan →
train13–40.0726%28 Dec →
dust210–13-0.059%28 Dec →
mirage13–6-0.0520%28 Dec →
overpass0–4-0.0733%26 Dec →
inferno8–130.0532%26 Dec →
dust24–130.0426%26 Dec →
dust24–13-0.0330%10 Nov →
ancient13–70.0625%28 Oct →
train13–90.0622%28 Oct →
overpass13–90.0125%28 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0419%26 Oct →
train2–13-0.0422%25 Oct →
inferno13–80.0032%25 Oct →
overpass13–70.2029%7 Oct →
inferno13–50.0730%7 Oct →
inferno13–70.0913%7 Oct →
inferno8–130.0624%6 Oct →
overpass11–130.0428%6 Oct →
mirage13–90.0324%2 Oct →
inferno9–2-0.0525%2 Oct →
inferno13–100.0228%23 Apr →
mirage7–130.0022%23 Apr →
anubis8–10.0022%6 Apr →
inferno13–100.0215%6 Apr →
dust213–60.0722%27 Mar →
nuke13–90.0126%7 Feb →
inferno11–130.0820%4 Feb →
dust213–70.1321%4 Feb →
dust213–70.1235%4 Feb →
mirage13–160.0727%13 Jan →
ancient13–40.1050%13 Jan →
inferno13–50.0723%11 Jan →
vertigo16–140.1220%29 Dec →
mirage13–110.0522%29 Dec →
overpass5–13-0.0219%28 Dec →
mirage13–00.1622%28 Dec →
anubis9–20.0447%25 Dec →
mirage6–13-0.0221%25 Dec →
mirage13–40.1032%20 Dec →
mirage8–130.0727%20 Dec →
inferno13–110.1322%19 Dec →
vertigo13–20.0716%19 Dec →
mirage15–150.0525%19 Dec →
overpass13–70.0216%5 Dec →
mirage13–40.1726%27 Nov →
overpass15–15-0.0128%26 Nov →
inferno6–130.0327%26 Nov →
vertigo13–80.0535%26 Nov →
overpass16–120.0424%24 Aug →
inferno9–50.1338%24 Aug →
inferno12–16-0.0228%24 Aug →
anubis8–80.0435%1 Aug →
mirage5–9-0.0420%1 Aug →
anubis16–40.1034%31 Jul →
inferno16–80.0826%27 Jul →
mirage13–160.0318%27 Jul →
dust216–70.0616%25 Jul →
mirage16–60.0315%25 Jul →
vertigo11–16-0.0016%23 Jul →
mirage13–10.0223%23 Jul →
inferno9–16-0.0520%23 Jul →
dust210–160.0222%20 Jul →
inferno7–16-0.0021%20 Jul →
mirage16–40.1022%17 Jul →
mirage16–30.0134%17 Jul →
inferno9–10.1145%17 Jul →
inferno16–60.1031%16 Jul →
mirage11–160.0127%10 Jul →
dust214–160.0816%10 Jul →
inferno12–160.0518%15 Dec →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.