solitude

solitude — CS2 Stats

PW76561198189456179[U:1:229190451]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

562Tracked matches64%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.7 StrongPositional Player
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 562 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 26 days played since 3 Mar 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 27,006 +412 1 Jun5 Jun · 2 days played
26,59427,006peak 27,0061 Jun5 Jun
Faceit ELO: 2,481 +0 13 Sept14 Sept · 2 observations
2,4812,481peak 2,48113 Sept14 Sept
27,006Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,481Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
26Days played since 2026-03-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,481
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 19 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-13
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsolitudePEAK ELO2,481csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim90
Positioning82
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT57385Last 10057%Win rateWTWLWTWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −5.4pp headshot accuracy · +48ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 311 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 542ms

Last 10

  • 712 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 553ms

Last 20

  • 1262 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 32%
  • Avg reaction 529ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim9.0
Utility4.0
Positioning8.2
Opening Duels7.5
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependenceStrong positioning

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 90 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 65% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.0
Positioning8.2
Utility4.0
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels7.4
Win Impact9.8

Composite 7.7/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time523ms−36ms
first ⅓ avg 559ms → last ⅓ avg 523ms
Headshot accuracy34.4%+7.4%
first ⅓ avg 27.0% → last ⅓ avg 34.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.24Best match rating · 9–2 · vertigo, 6 Jun
100%Best headshot accuracy · 2–1 · train, 4 Sept
320msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · train, 4 Sept
13–1Biggest win · cache, 3 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
37In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 88% over 8mirageWeakest map · 40% over 15
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC156940%0.03
cacheA148657%0.05
dust2B137654%0.04
vertigoS87188%0.10
nukeS86275%0.05
anubisA85363%0.06
ancientC73443%0.04
infernoB63350%0.05
trainB63350%0.03
officeA53260%0.02
overpass440100%0.12
italy31233%-0.04
boulder110100%0.11
debris1010%-0.07
poseidon1010%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,412Matches
52%Win rate
1.17Avg K/D
89.0ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7261%1.3317.6
Dust25054%1.5019.2
Anubis3456%1.6519.3
Inferno2658%1.5218.0
Ancient2556%1.2618.4
Overpass1292%1.8722.2
Nuke650%1.2119.0
Train250%2.3023.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

33.0%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.1%Spray accuracy
80.5%Counter-strafing
7.7°Preaim
527msReaction time
53.9%T opening success
65.3%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
11.50HE damage / grenade
3.25Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 3.2536 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo13–40.0935%7 Sept
ancient12–12-0.0017%7 Sept
nuke13–80.0131%7 Sept
inferno10–130.1028%7 Sept
cache13–40.1223%6 Sept
vertigo12–120.0225%6 Sept
anubis13–20.0937%6 Sept
nuke13–20.0437%6 Sept
boulder6–00.1129%6 Sept
anubis13–80.1233%6 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0328%5 Sept
cache13–40.1034%5 Sept
cache11–13-0.0132%5 Sept
cache13–90.1633%5 Sept
cache9–130.0647%5 Sept
cache13–6-0.0631%5 Sept
anubis11–130.1035%5 Sept
nuke13–90.0738%5 Sept
italy4–13-0.0330%5 Sept
train13–60.0838%4 Sept
train2–10.01100%4 Sept
nuke5–130.1035%4 Sept
office13–30.0727%4 Sept
cache13–40.0730%4 Sept
mirage13–30.0635%4 Sept
cache11–13-0.0225%3 Sept
cache8–13-0.1047%3 Sept
cache13–10.0619%3 Sept
cache11–130.0238%3 Sept
cache13–60.0350%2 Sept
cache4–130.1227%2 Sept
italy13–3-0.0219%2 Sept
debris4–9-0.0745%2 Sept
vertigo13–10.0225%2 Sept
cache13–100.1348%1 Sept
office13–90.0841%1 Sept
train9–130.0239%1 Sept
ancient13–70.0341%1 Sept
dust213–80.0937%1 Sept
mirage10–13-0.0357%1 Sept
nuke13–70.0433%1 Sept
office5–13-0.0533%31 Aug
nuke5–130.0169%31 Aug
train4–13-0.0132%31 Aug
office13–90.0545%31 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0323%31 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0163%31 Aug
office1–13-0.0438%31 Aug
dust24–13-0.0035%31 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0039%31 Aug
train13–70.1152%31 Aug
anubis13–30.0722%31 Aug
train4–13-0.0022%29 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0127%29 Aug
anubis5–130.0327%29 Aug
dust213–50.0556%28 Aug
overpass13–80.1933%28 Aug
inferno13–30.1216%28 Aug
italy12–12-0.0745%28 Aug
vertigo13–70.0322%28 Aug
inferno5–9-0.0364%28 Aug
dust213–90.0323%10 Jun
vertigo13–80.0936%7 Jun
vertigo11–10.1014%7 Jun
nuke13–10.0939%6 Jun
vertigo9–20.2423%6 Jun
nuke13–50.0624%6 Jun
dust29–130.0129%6 Jun
dust213–50.0926%5 Jun
dust213–60.1224%1 Jun
dust20–13-0.030%1 Jun
mirage16–130.0919%1 Jun
mirage13–50.1345%1 Jun
overpass13–90.0444%1 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0514%31 May
poseidon6–9-0.0450%31 May
mirage10–130.0024%31 May
dust21–130.0340%31 May
mirage13–80.0738%30 May
dust20–5-0.170%24 May
mirage3–60.2128%24 May
mirage5–13-0.050%24 May
anubis13–80.1034%24 May
dust212–120.1331%10 Apr
dust213–20.1138%10 Apr
vertigo13–60.1927%10 Apr
mirage14–16-0.0427%12 Mar
overpass13–20.1324%11 Mar
overpass13–20.1334%11 Mar
ancient11–13-0.0029%9 Mar
ancient16–13-0.0311%8 Mar
mirage13–40.1122%7 Mar
inferno13–100.0926%7 Mar
ancient13–60.0533%7 Mar
mirage14–16-0.0619%5 Mar
dust213–110.0429%5 Mar
inferno13–100.0429%5 Mar
ancient8–130.0532%5 Mar
anubis13–60.0123%5 Mar
ancient12–120.1843%3 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →