Nato

Nato — CS2 Stats

CY76561198186884681[U:1:226618953]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

693Tracked matches46%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.7 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,232Purple band · top ~15.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#95926 of 224774 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,978 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 693 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 40 days played since 27 Dec 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,232 -8,300 27 Dec15 Sept · 25 days played
18,23226,619peak 26,61927 Dec15 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,978 +0 30 Aug15 Sept · 6 observations
1,9781,978peak 1,97830 Aug15 Sept
26,996Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,978Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
40Days played since 2025-12-27

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,978
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 23 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 8,387 below peak (26,619)
  • 0 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 1,768 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNatoFACEITLevel 9 · 1,978 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER18,232 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,978csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning62
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47512Last 10047%Win rateTWLLLWLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · −1.4pp headshot accuracy · −7ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 131 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 28%
  • Avg reaction 631ms

Last 20

  • 992 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 635ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility6.1
Positioning6.2
Opening Duels5.1
Clutch2.8

Excellent counter-strafingEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.84 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 619ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning6.2
Utility6.1
Mechanics8.8
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact3.8

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time623ms+30ms
first ⅓ avg 593ms → last ⅓ avg 623ms
Headshot accuracy27.9%+7.0%
first ⅓ avg 21.0% → last ⅓ avg 27.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–5 · ancient, 9 May
46%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · mirage, 25 May
391msFastest reaction time · 9–13 · inferno, 29 Dec
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 20 May

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
108In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 71% over 21nukeWeakest map · 25% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2115671%0.03
dust2C2081240%-0.00
infernoC1981142%-0.01
nukeD1641225%-0.01
ancientA159660%0.02
overpass42250%-0.02
anubis21150%-0.04
cache1010%0.07
vertigo1010%0.04
train1010%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

453Matches
50%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
83.0ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4245%1.0315.2
Inferno4159%1.0816.5
Dust23537%1.0517.1
Ancient3352%1.1217.3
Nuke2343%1.1016.4
Overpass1747%1.1717.6
Anubis333%1.0615.3
Vertigo250%0.8311.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

28.0%Headshot accuracy
34.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.0%Spray accuracy
89.4%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
619msReaction time
40.6%T opening success
48.3%CT opening success
0.84Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
15.08HE damage / grenade
6.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke15–150.0229%15 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0124%11 Jun
ancient10–130.0024%11 Jun
dust211–130.0015%11 Jun
nuke4–130.0022%11 Jun
inferno9–50.0630%3 Jun
overpass5–130.0028%29 May
mirage13–90.0646%25 May
inferno13–110.0130%25 May
cache11–130.0733%23 May
dust213–10.0323%20 May
mirage13–40.1933%12 May
vertigo9–130.0427%12 May
mirage13–30.0726%12 May
mirage13–50.1430%12 May
inferno9–13-0.0236%9 May
ancient13–50.2130%9 May
ancient4–130.0426%9 May
dust215–150.0335%11 Mar
inferno4–13-0.0729%26 Feb
ancient11–130.0323%26 Feb
nuke6–13-0.0826%25 Feb
dust21–13-0.1033%24 Feb
nuke1–13-0.0722%19 Feb
nuke16–14-0.0134%17 Feb
nuke2–13-0.0526%10 Feb
dust25–130.0226%10 Feb
dust219–170.0524%7 Feb
inferno13–6-0.0425%7 Feb
inferno22–180.1020%7 Feb
inferno13–110.0235%7 Feb
dust29–13-0.0234%5 Feb
ancient13–8-0.0119%3 Feb
nuke8–13-0.0424%29 Jan
dust26–130.0535%28 Jan
nuke13–50.0226%27 Jan
nuke13–10.1322%27 Jan
inferno13–90.0328%27 Jan
inferno8–13-0.0127%25 Jan
anubis13–11-0.0824%25 Jan
inferno13–90.0438%25 Jan
mirage13–10.0218%25 Jan
ancient13–70.0635%25 Jan
ancient13–11-0.0019%25 Jan
ancient6–13-0.0226%25 Jan
ancient7–13-0.0223%25 Jan
nuke9–13-0.0315%25 Jan
dust27–13-0.0221%24 Jan
inferno13–20.0026%24 Jan
mirage13–110.0327%24 Jan
anubis6–130.0119%22 Jan
mirage3–13-0.0526%19 Jan
dust213–90.0123%17 Jan
inferno4–13-0.0420%15 Jan
dust213–70.0126%15 Jan
dust213–60.0219%13 Jan
inferno8–13-0.1027%13 Jan
overpass13–90.0024%13 Jan
ancient7–130.0028%11 Jan
train4–13-0.0819%9 Jan
inferno1–13-0.0814%9 Jan
mirage9–13-0.0219%7 Jan
inferno11–13-0.0439%6 Jan
dust213–8-0.0328%3 Jan
nuke10–13-0.0420%3 Jan
overpass13–5-0.0519%3 Jan
mirage13–10.0223%3 Jan
nuke13–8-0.0030%3 Jan
nuke6–130.0124%3 Jan
mirage13–110.0416%3 Jan
mirage7–13-0.0216%2 Jan
mirage13–10-0.0317%2 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0121%2 Jan
ancient13–6-0.0129%2 Jan
overpass10–13-0.0226%2 Jan
nuke15–19-0.0019%2 Jan
dust28–130.0041%2 Jan
mirage13–50.0244%31 Dec
inferno11–13-0.0313%31 Dec
ancient13–20.088%31 Dec
ancient13–50.0511%31 Dec
dust216–130.0722%31 Dec
nuke9–13-0.0110%30 Dec
mirage14–16-0.0118%30 Dec
ancient16–14-0.077%30 Dec
dust25–13-0.0716%30 Dec
mirage13–70.0417%30 Dec
dust29–130.0127%29 Dec
nuke11–13-0.0322%29 Dec
inferno9–13-0.0321%29 Dec
dust213–6-0.0510%29 Dec
dust25–130.0229%29 Dec
mirage10–130.0325%29 Dec
mirage13–50.0118%29 Dec
mirage13–60.0628%29 Dec
inferno1–5-0.0218%28 Dec
inferno11–130.0716%28 Dec
ancient13–6-0.0219%27 Dec
dust29–13-0.0621%27 Dec
mirage13–80.0234%27 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →